Faster?
how about speed ?
Is CS finally back to the speed PS5 was?
I always thought PS7 was a real snail
how about speed ?
Is CS finally back to the speed PS5 was?
I always thought PS7 was a real snail
Originally posted by robotrenegade
HAHA, better question why did they make it. CS looks pimp ass all ****. I can't wait to try these out on my new G5.
Originally posted by paulc
A LOT of the professional photo-journalists I know universally have issues with printing in X; especially with Epson printers (mostly the 1280, a real workhorse for that market). To get them actually running X, I "taught" them you CAN have 2 copies of Photoshop, one for editing in X and one set to "open in Classic."
Originally posted by nacl99
One of the big reasons Macromedia Progs look so bad is a while back Adobe sued them about using Palettes, so that had a chilling effect on making the interface like Adobe.
Don't know if thats good or bad, I wish Adobe would just buy them so we wouldn't have to use two different companies.
I agree, where's the beef ?Originally posted by dongmin
I don't know about photoshop, but the illustrator upgrade is really weak. Some of the type features are nice, but that's about it from what I can tell. The 3d feature is ridiculous. With the proliferation of 3d programs, what pro would seriously use it for their work? The InDesign upgrade is only a little better. They're asking a lot of money for a few decent features. I'm curious to see if their claims for speed enhancements. Anyone try a pre-release version of these programs?
I've been using GoLive since version 4 and though I like it, I've had major problems with it. I too will wait for reviews, but I'm feeling more and more sucked in by Dreamweaver. I used Dreamweaver 3 some years ago and thought it was so simple to use. Never had that feeling with GoLive. GoLive is very slow on my mac.Originally posted by Aeolius
Without LiveMotion, GoLive just doesn't seem worth upgrading.
Sure they added tighter integration with Photoshop and Illustrator; neither of which I use, at this time. I switched over to PhotoPAINT and CorelDRAW awhile back. Granted, unless Corel gets its act together and either sells Bryce or reinstates Mac development, I may switch over to Freehand.
When creating a webpage, GoLive needs to have the ease one finds with .Mac and the speed one associates with a blogging application.
Oh well. Guess I'll wait for a few GoLive reviews to come out and for Adobe to officially announce their plans for LiveMotion, before I consider upgrading.
Originally posted by Photorun
hey OS 9 users, you were holding up the OS X versions from being better in OS X, deal with it, you're working on a legacy OS!
Originally posted by airmac
man, they eliminate Pagemaker..
now that's a bummer if you ask me...yeah i'm also using indesign but nothing can compete with the speed of Pagemaker.
Originally posted by segastyle
so this means that pirating should be cut down a lot... so they can lower their prices down to reasonable amounts, right?
i mean, wasn't pirating of software one of the original reasons they made their prices so high to begin with?
Originally posted by greenstork
I happen to work for a non-profit that can't afford a new computer to run OS X. My iMac 333MHz simply doesn't cut it. While I realize that I am in the minority as it pertains to design, I think your comment is rather callous and slightly ingnorant. So, sorry we're poor and holding up your software development but I think you need to get a grip on real world users.
Originally posted by Insatiable
And yet, another version of Illustrator without multiple-page document capability. Anybody want to tell Adobe that we have officially entered a new millennium?
Originally posted by plastree
With these products being osX exclusive, I wonder if Adobe has replaced some of the carbon code with cocoa. Illustrator 10 is so unbelievably sloowww I can't believe it was ever released. Photoshop 7's performance is acceptable, although it sucks at opening files. I've never used InDesign, but I hear it's embarrassingly pokey as well. If these new versions exhibit significant speed boosts, they'll be worth the upgrade price for that alone.
Originally posted by cljmac
well it was nice to see there 1.41 minute flash demo was using os10 and not windows....
Originally posted by Dahl
I feel like like Adobe and MM is relasing upgrades all the time now, maybe they have had this release schedule all the time ?
Originally posted by Macrumors
Today, Adobe has announced the Adobe Creative Suite.
The new Creative Suite comes in two versions - the Premium Edition and Standard edition.
Standard Edition ($999) includes Photoshop CS, Illustrator CS, InDesign CS and Version Cue, while the Premium Edition ($1229) also includes GoLive CS and Acrobat 6.0 Professional.
The new CS versions of Adobe's tools are also available f
or
seperate individual purchase and upgrade.
Originally posted by Insatiable
Originally posted by andrewh
They have a program for that, it's called "InDesign"....
I agree it would be nice but it's really an illustration program. Designed for creating artwork, single page layouts, etc. Just as Photoshop is for image editing and doesn't have multiple page layouts. They have a specific tool for the job. And while it might be frustrating they can't throw in the kitchen sink into every program.
Illustrator is a flexible and powerful program which is missing a very basic--and easy to implement--feature. I didn't ask for the kitchen sink in every Adobe program; I asked for multiple-page documents in Illustrator now that we're hitting, y'know, verison 11! And since when do MPD's constitute "the kitchen sink?" If that's the case, what does the new 3-D modeling feature constitute?
Plus they wouldn't sell as much software either!
Isn't the point of the whole "CS" strategy to avoid this scenario? And if Adobe thinks that MPD's in Illustrator will hurt InDesign sales that much then they should just go ahead and concede the page-layout battle to Quark. I though InDesign had more going for it than that.
Your Illustrator artwork will import seamlessly into InDesign. It does already. I have to do this to make multipage PDF's.
And if Illustrator had MPD's, you wouldn't have to do this, now would you? Case closed.
Originally posted by nacl99
Not to be rude, but if you can't afford a new Mac, how could you afford all the adobe upgrades overtime?
The OS9 argument makes no sense, you want the newest cutting edge adobe software. BUT you want it to work on your old ass legacy OS9.
Following that line of thinking, I'm frankly pissed off that the new photoshop doesn't support MS-DOS!