Yeah, what's up with that? In Photoshop you can select "show Application frame" to get rid of the fullscreen nonsense, but in Dreamweaver this option doesn't exist.Dreamweaver is a bloated mess. It takes over the entire screen. It's ridiculous on a big 27" monitor. I used to use it but now prefer more nimble and better implemented apps such as Espresso and Coda. Adobe stuff feels heavier than MS Office on the Mac.
Adobe sucks in many ways but they should still have credit where credit is due. You're being extremely unfair.Maybe because Adobe was ignoring the open standard to promote its own proprietary closed standard. Abusing its monopoly over image editing to force Flash on every one.
First, it was Macromedia who owned Flash for 10 years before the company was acquired by Adobe. Macromedia kept Flash/SWF sealed shut during all that time. 2 years after Adobe bought Macromedia, they published the specs for the SWF format (the same year they made PDF an open standard).
Second, back when Macromedia owned Flash, Adobe had their own alternative for vector based animations on the web, LiveMotion. And LiveMotion supported the SVG format, which was already an open standard. So: Adobe pushed for an open standard, Macromedia pushed for their closed format, and Adobe lost.
Consequently, you can't retroactively blame Adobe for Flash having been a proprietary format for so long, when they didn't even have control over it until after 2006. And you also can't blame them for the fact that the proprietary SWF format became more popular than the SVG format, the open standard that Adobe supported. You should blame the masses for that. The masses had a choice and they crapped on the open standard alternative in favor of Flash, against Adobe's wishes. And now they're pointing fingers at Adobe for resisting evolution? Wow, how can you ever win in the eyes of a public like that.