fabsgwu said:
I was responding to people on the Forum who suggested that might be a next step. Inserting album art ads would be just as bad, IMO.
Again, though, in what version of reality has anyone with any authority said anything like Apple actually doing that?
Don't respond to posts from forum people who didn't read or didn't understand the article as though they know what they're talking about. Read the ... article.
Now, that having been said, I think at face value the article
does say that Apple will be adding a new option for advertisers. However, given the various conceptual errors the author makes, I think it is just about as likely that he is talking about podcasts (ESPN) using the technology (album/chapter art) that already exists to sell ads. In the first paragraph of the piece, it sounded like he was talking about selling space in the lede banner on the iTunes Music Store, but that doesn't fit with any of the rest of the article, so that's probably not it either.
On the other hand, it is hard to square album art with the statement "We are looking at new technology that will provide a much richer advertising experience [than 30-second audio ads] and hope to roll that out very soon." When advertisers talk about "rich", they usually mean one of two things:
1. Motion video
2. Interactivity (even as basic as a "click here to go to our web site" link)
As a result, I think it is highly possible that Apple is planning on expanding the "album art" podcast tag to allow for either quicktime video or for basic HTML. One can only hope that if they do HTML then they deactivate the "break out" features which riddle HTML ads in the web at large (popup windows, popunders, DHTML "you didn't really want to read that paragraph, did you?" craptacularities).
In any case, there's not enough here for
anyone to get their panties in a bunch. Chill. Wait and see what happens.
For all you people howling about Apple stealing podcast content, inserting ads, and broadcasting that out ... man, you guys muct have some potent drugs out there!
Off-topic: I found it amusing that clicking on the link sent me to a full-page ad for ... nothing. Just a blank page with "Skip this ad" in the top-right. You'd think the brain trust at Advertising Age would be able to figure out this whole interstitial ad thing the cool kids have been playing with for five or six years now already ...