1. The pilot wants to get there safely too. He / she probably has someone they care for very much waiting for them to return home.
Damn right. Keep in mind that almost always, we'll be the first ones to the scene of the accident.
1. The pilot wants to get there safely too. He / she probably has someone they care for very much waiting for them to return home.
Doesn't that distort the risk of being involved in a fatal crash then?
Hypothetically a single large catastrophe could produce a huge chunk of annual fatalities, but represent only one journey. In fact, another poster mentioned how it's been nearly 3 years since an American fatality occurred in the sky. In that one year, that accident probably accounted for a disproportionate share of total fatalities.
A better metric would be #of fatal crashes/total # of flights, since that would better represent the odds that something is going to happen to you on any given flight. You could even weight passenger size to account for outliers.
The chances of surviving in a car crash is higher than on a plane.
Just pray you don't get sat next to an oversized German, on top of everything else.
Anyone know whether you're most likely to survive an emergency landing over sea or land?
The sea has very few 10,000 foot runways.
Only Sully is capable of a sea landing, IMHO.![]()
Transatlantic flights (especially at night) are just the worst, cannot for a second keep still when flying over the sea. The thought of going in thr ocean is absolutely terrying, and not to mention no airports nearby if anything goes wrong.
Anyone know whether you're most likely to survive an emergency landing over sea or land?
rovex said:The sea has very few 10,000 foot runways.
Only Sully is capable of a sea landing, IMHO.![]()
Indeed, but look what happened in new York Hudson river.
It's a shame the OP hasn't been back to give us any kind of update.
Transatlantic flights (especially at night) are just the worst, cannot for a second keep still when flying over the sea. The thought of going in thr ocean is absolutely terrying, and not to mention no airports nearby if anything goes wrong.
Anyone know whether you're most likely to survive an emergency landing over sea or land?
Transatlantic flights (especially at night) are just the worst, cannot for a second keep still when flying over the sea. The thought of going in thr ocean is absolutely terrying, and not to mention no airports nearby if anything goes wrong.
Anyone know whether you're most likely to survive an emergency landing over sea or land?
You're actually not too far from a diversion airport. If you take a more northerly route, you'll be near Canada, Greenland or Iceland, and on a southernly route, you're close to the Azores.
I'm trying to think of situations where a TATL flight crashed because it couldn't divert and might've made a safe emergency landing, and can't think of any. TWA 800 crashed shortly after takeoff near Long Island. Pan Am 103 was terrorism, AF 447 had no chance of a safe landing and could've just as easily happened over land.
My thoughts exactly, can't remember any incident where a plane safely landed in the middle of the atlantic or any ocean for that matter.
My thoughts exactly, can't remember any incident where a plane safely landed in the middle of the atlantic or any ocean for that matter.
And what about the Pacific, any particular cases of accidents being avoided over water?