Apple products sell because they look great and work great. It think it's insulting to both Apple and the consumer to imply that their products are purchased solely for the Apple logo rather than their own merits, and it also says a lot about the critic who would choose to dismiss Apple outright rather than seek to understand them better.
Looks are subjective. I think it's safe to say plenty buy for the logo. I'm not saying "everyone," but let's face it some do. I buy what I believe is the best, and lately it hasn't been Apple. Maybe in the future that will change.
Wake me up when one of you does come upon a design that's both different and better. The competition certainly has tried, and it sure seems like nobody has a better alternative than what Apple is peddling here. I think people underestimate the sheer amount of engineering effort that goes into miniaturising all the parts and fitting them into the AirPods.
Okay, time to wake up!
Logitech's options for charging their mouse has the port on the front of the mouse. It can be used and charged at the same time. Not a difficult thing to do.
Just do a Google search for wireless phones and plenty show up that could be better than the AirPods.
For all we know, Apple tried a ton of designs, and eventually still went back to the EarPods design because they couldn't find anything better. So between doing something different but worse, and doing something similar but better, Apple chose the latter, and I can respect that.
Nonsense if the Airpods are best they could do. While it is my opinion, the design is lazy. Plain and simple.