Should't have rushed to announced them. Waste of momentum big time.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AirPods Delay Attributed to Apple Ensuring Both Earpieces Receive Audio at Same Time [Updated]
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
AirPods were originally slated to launch in October, but the wireless earphones were later delayed. Apple said it needed "a little more time" before they are ready for customers, and it has yet to provide an official update since.
While the exact reason for the delay remains unclear, a person familiar with the development of AirPods told The Wall Street Journal that Apple's troubles appear to be related to its "efforts to chart a new path for wireless headphones," in addition to resolving what happens when users lose one of the earpieces or the battery dies.Last month, Barclays analysts said AirPods should enter production in December. Their research note said quantities would be limited to between 10 and 15 million AirPods to start. Meanwhile, an alleged email response from Apple CEO Tim Cook said AirPods should begin shipping over the "next few weeks."
With just two weeks remaining in the holiday shopping season, some believe Apple should now wait until the new year to launch AirPods, in line with an early rumor about a January 2017 launch. The wireless earphones remain listed as both "coming soon" and "currently unavailable" on different sections of Apple's website.
Article Link: AirPods Delay Attributed to Apple Ensuring Both Earpieces Receive Audio at Same Time
While the easy thing to do is lash out due to frustration, I will try to continue to be patient as difficult as that is. I hope they are great when they launch.
I'd say the issue is more that they announced them, announced a release date (month) and removed the headphone jack from the iPhone 7 before fully testing them and getting them market-ready.
They can test them for a ten years if they want, just don't tell us all about them until they're ready.
Sentence him to walk home with 2 Oral-B pieces hanging from his ears...
How dare the Wall Street Journal want paying for their work. Because, clearly, all their staff work for free.
Anyone know how I can get an iPhone without the greedy purchase price?
So why are the Beats X still delayed then? The buds are wired together...
This makes no physical sense what so ever. These buds are, what a foot apart and bluetooth happens at the speed of ***** light. Receiving the signal at the same time is nonsense. If it is two independent signals and the problem is that the earbuds aren't receiving the right signals at the right time, its because the right signals aren't being broadcast at the right time.
And honestly, how is such a simple problem such a huge obstacle for Apple? For how long have we been broadcasting simultaneous stereo radio signals?
And honestly, how is such a simple problem such a huge obstacle for Apple? For how long have we been broadcasting simultaneous stereo radio signals?
It's disappointing that they've been delayed but it's for the right reasons. A bug like this is a very huge deal.
I am curious why they never sorted this out in development, it would seem to me this would be one of the first things to overcome in the design.
I am curious why they never sorted this out in development, it would seem to me this would be one of the first things to overcome in the design.
"every single non-bluetooth project stays on schedule." I want to live and work where you think you live and work.
Wow. You don't get it do you? The Beats X are NOT delayed. They won't ship until AirPods ship. Simple.
No thanks. I would lose them within an hour.
Last edited:
Wouldn't you be saying the same thing if they shipped it and it wasn't working properly? For people like you, it seems like Apple will always fail.
This sounds like something that should have been resolved before handing it off to the marketing team...
Uhhh…I sure hope this isn't the reason because wow Apple, wow.
I've also wondered what happens if you have several of them in your family and they get mixed up. Do they pair over proximity or will you just have to keep trying different ones until you find your match? Not likely to be a problem at first but over time I imagine they will sell lots of these and at some point many years down the road they will probably come in the box after they eliminate the Lightning port. It would also be nice to be able to buy a replacement piece if you lose one side, and if that is ever an option you need to be able to pair them back together.
I've also wondered what happens if you have several of them in your family and they get mixed up. Do they pair over proximity or will you just have to keep trying different ones until you find your match? Not likely to be a problem at first but over time I imagine they will sell lots of these and at some point many years down the road they will probably come in the box after they eliminate the Lightning port. It would also be nice to be able to buy a replacement piece if you lose one side, and if that is ever an option you need to be able to pair them back together.
This would have been a non-issue if they did not announce and commit to a release date so early. Now they are paying the price.
It's disappointing they're delayed but I can wait. People are freaking out over this. I'll keep saying it until it gets into people's thick heads. If they released them in October and had issues, people would get grumpy. Apple made a mistake announcing these when they did but admitted they needed more time. Guess what? They're PEOPLE. People make mistakes. Get over it.
Oh and, there's nothing out there like this. It's a brand new product and teething issues were bound to happen.
Oh and, there's nothing out there like this. It's a brand new product and teething issues were bound to happen.
I grow less and less interested in this product the longer it gets delayed.
RF Multipathing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipath_propagation) causes the strongest signal to not travel in a straight line. Remember the shortest distance is though a couple feet of flesh which is which is 50% water. Water absorbs RF extremely well and will attenuate the signal.
Maybe offer the product while not removing the headphone jack for the first generation for the early adopters?