I wonder how much of the sold out is from scalpers as the fleabay price for the blues is now hovering around $900!"Sold out"? More like they released the product before they setup the supply chain for it to see the hype first
I wonder how much of the sold out is from scalpers as the fleabay price for the blues is now hovering around $900!"Sold out"? More like they released the product before they setup the supply chain for it to see the hype first
Ok, if iPads are not a comparison for your liking, what about Apple Watches? Good enough comparison?iPads are not wearable, no reason in comparing the two.
No they're not, but again half price and with included headphone jack, included hardshell, plastic is why they weigh less. More battery life too. Touch panel does suck, and so does switching devices. But I also like being able to use them with my Switch, use them on plane infotainment system, use them on a work Desktop PC without Bluetooth, etc. Not sure the ANC will be better when Airpod Pros have still been said to be worse than the Sony comparables.I have the XM3s also. They're good headphones, in fact the best I've ever bought (comfort is unmatched, and they're the only headphones I've owned in years that haven't broken within a year or so!), but they're not perfect. The software is pokey. Some aspects of the UX aren't great (switching between devices. Nearly useless microphone. Stupid touch panel - arrgh!). And mine have developed a somewhat annoying hiss in one side when noise cancelling is on.
They also have that "plasticky" Sony build feel and annoying creak in the headband when they move around.
Some of this stuff might be fixed on the XM4s, but I'm seriously tempted to go for Apple's as my next purchase. The AirPods Max have some clear advantages over the XM4: 9 microphones, surround sound with huge suite of positioning sensors including gyroscope and accelerometer etc. Presumably the sound quality and NC will be at least as good as Sony's, and the software, UX and "build quality" are guaranteed to be significantly better.
The only unknown for me is whether the comfort matches the XM3s when worn for long periods. Weight is a concern. But I'm certainly willing to give Apple's a shot.
We have no idea how much stock they had. And bots could have bought them. They seem to be buying all the PS5s."Too niche" yet sold out for 3 months?
Iconic designs don't need a logo to be recognized. The original iPod only had a logo on the back, and it was subtle as well. But anyone seeing the front immediately knew it was an iPod.Did I miss it or is there really no Apple logo on them?
Don't be fooled by the headphones alone, these are essential for anything AR and VR in the future. Especially the sound that is tracking head movement, this product is an early spinoff from ongoing sound and VR R&D.Of course it is - and that's what I love most about these. That the biggest tech company in the world is willing to spend R&D making what is essential a niche device and will generate about 0.0001% of the iPhone income.
Even if I don't want the items, I'm very happy when Apple releases niche devices like the XDR display and to a lesser degree these -- because ultimately it's not making them anymore significant money and they could easily not bother.
Go read a book on consumer habits and marketing instead of pulling stuff like that out of your you know where.You do realize they didn't sell out in any market because they didn't have any in stock to begin with?
Also not everybody wants to spend the money they don't have to buy a product they can't afford to impress people they don't like.
Or, they realize that it’s a smaller market and prepared their supply chain appropriately so there wouldn’t be too much unsold stock on hand."Sold out"? More like they released the product before they setup the supply chain for it to see the hype first
You call that hazardous, I call that working perfectly as designed.Wearing noise canceling headphones at home can become hazardous when your significant other has to start yelling and waving arms at you to be heard. Not to mention the sneers and grimacing looks. I know this first hand.
Exactly. Both the product names and designs of most other brands are too generic and barely memorable.Iconic designs don't need a logo to be recognized. The original iPod only had a logo on the back, and it was subtle as well. But anyone seeing the front immediately knew it was an iPod.
These things have a sufficiently distinct look that will be recognizable by most of the general public. Can that be said about the Sonys, Beats, and Boses? Probably not, hence the need for a huge logo so that everyone knows what brand they are.
Go read a book on consumer habits and marketing instead of pulling stuff like that out of your you know where.
We live in a world primarily concerned with success and appearing successful(healthy, wealthy, attractive, “cool”).
Don’t tell me that your average consumer is deeply concerned and knowledgeable on the quality of products in general.
I would imagine that they are talking in regards to unit sales and market share.JBL?
They make budget crappy headphones since when they are a leading headphones brand?
I love my upgrade from the 11 Pro to the 12 Mini. Battery life isn’t bad at all, it’s just that reviewers have grown accustomed to the large batteries in gigantic phones.That is kind of surprising, because for years we were hearing forum members whine that they really need an up to date iPhone at a smaller form factor.
That's what I'm saying, we can't know the demand from the current situation because we don't know how many were for sale, how many were in production, and how many are now ordered.Or, they realize that it’s a smaller market and prepared their supply chain appropriately so there wouldn’t be too much unsold stock on hand.
same story, different perspective. I feel like they may have had too many HomePods on hand at launch and learned a lesson.
You do realize they didn't sell out in any market because they didn't have any in stock to begin with?
Also not everybody wants to spend the money they don't have to buy a product they can't afford to impress people they don't like.
Edit: Nobody that I know who purchased Airpods Pro bought them as "fashion statement", they're all actively using the Airpods for function and convenience.
Big, heavy, expensive, and lets robbers know exactly who to target. I would rather stick with my airpods. Maybe if future revisions can bring the cost down I might get one for home use only
But you know for sure that they didn't sell many because they didn't produce many?That's what I'm saying, we can't know the demand from the current situation because we don't know how many were for sale, how many were in production, and how many are now ordered.
I have to ask you then ... with Apple's iTunes and Apple Music streaming audio codec being AAC/SBC ... how are you able to enjoy better music quality on your Shure A50 and B&0 H95's if you're still using those as your source music catalog? Are iPhone's capable of a better audio codec over bluetooth or via Lightning port for sound out?Being in the Apple ecosystem, airpod Pro’s have been convenient to use. Now I also have a Shure A50 and B&0 H95 (both wireless with ANC). For me the key to AirPod Max pricing is, what is the sound quality is like? If it’s anything like the H95 that is priced at £700, it will be a steal. Mind you the AirPod Max bluetooth codec is AAC/SBC, which is less than many much cheaper Bluetooth/ANC brands.
We live in a World built on credit(loans, credit cards, payment plans, etc.). Exactly how are people spending consciously?LOL
You must be one of those teenagers who uses parents' money to buy Apple products as "fashion statement".
I really wonder where you live if your entire world is concerned with success and appearing successful (wealthy, attractive, "cool").
If you had traveled anywhere outside your world you'd see that people have lives to live and they spend money consciously. Don't worry though, you can do that when you grow up.
SoYou do realize they didn't sell out in any market because they didn't have any in stock to begin with?
Also not everybody wants to spend the money they don't have to buy a product they can't afford to impress people they don't like.
Edit: Nobody that I know who purchased Airpods Pro bought them as "fashion statement", they're all actively using the Airpods for function and convenience.
Teenagers are not a market? Where on Earth are you pulling that from? They are just about the best demographic to appeal to because they have next to no responsibilities but are easily influencing by advertising and get money and gifts left and right from their hard working parents and relatives.Ok, if iPads are not a comparison for your liking, what about Apple Watches? Good enough comparison?
Apple Watches are also wearables, but they're not "fashion statement". People (including myself) are using them for the functions and the convenience.
Only people that I've seen who buy Apple Products as fashion statements have been my friends' teenage kids who want to impress other kids at school.
That's hardly a "market".
Perhaps you should read the article again. There's absolutely no claim in that article that Apple doesn't sell headphones in the price range of JBL, Sony, and Bose. I know exactly what you're misinterpreting and it definitely doesn't say what you think it does.Read the article: they were claiming that Apple didn't sell headphones in the price range of JBL, Sony, Bose...which is obviously completely wrong.
Who's logic are you refuting? The article isn't suggesting Apple shouldn't sell the headphones. It's saying they're too niche of a product to boost sales... ironically, just like the Mac Pro you mentioned. Now, whether or not their prediction turns out to be true is a matter of debate. The fact they aren't suggesting what you're comment is implying isn't.By this logic, Apple shouldn't sell the Mac Pro either, since that a niche of a niche market.
Sold out doesn't mean much without numbers. If I painted a painting and sold it I've sold out after selling one item. In Apples case I'm sure they were not expecting iPhone numbers at launch and have produced significantly less Airpod Max's. So selling out of let's say a million Airpod Max's is less impressive than selling out 100's of millions of IPhones."Too niche" yet sold out for 3 months?