To be fair, I was responding to what appeared to be an uninformed rant. I'm glad I could provide some clarity for you.Law enforcement have been using trackers for years. AirTags don't change this.
Apple have gone to a lot of effort to highlight that they do not have access to the location data of an AirTag - this is only available to the owner. I get your point - we have to believe that Apple are telling the truth, but history has shown that Apple is one of the few companies that does seem to care about user privacy. At the end of the day, AirTags aren't changing the landscape much at all. Similar trackers (Tile) have existed for years, as well as more sophisticated trackers that use GPS and have literally 0 anti-stalking features.
Yeah, but law enforcement cannot track someone else without a warrant and probable cause to do so whereas a private company can with direct consent. I don’t want my iPhone being used for anything with these at all, so I’m hoping that I can turn off everything and have it truly be turned off. We really need a more robust restatement of our constitutional rights (especially 4A) in light of technology. Tracker technology should concern everyone, and the false narrative of “trustworthy vs. not trustworthy” will eventually lead us far astray because it is nothing close to a black and white issue. Trust should be on a per-issue basis, not a per-company basis. Companies change roles, leadership, and values over time, and iPhone is so entrenched as a product and exists within a monopoly market between Android. Even not having a phone at this point subjects someone to surveillance, so “don’t use it” isn’t even a viable option. And what, if they start to do super Draconian things, we have to keep a phone for 10 years that doesn’t implement the feature? Where’s the point of pushback?
Indeed tracking is pervasive and there are much cheaper and smaller tracking devices on the market already, and it’s pervasive. A 3G SIM can be tossed into just about anything with a negligible data plan and achieve geolocating coordinates. I’m mostly concerned with if they’re just straight up lying. I listened to Rudy Giuliani tonight say how the DOJ just pulled all of his documents off of iCloud
while representing Trump (which is privileged information and blatantly unconstitutional/illegal). And I’m getting smug “Lol” replies on here when I mention that any evidence possessed is evidence able to be subpoenaed. We should all care when surveillance is used inappropriately instead of buying into political garbage. Because it’s numbing us to privacy/constitutional rights violations.
I suppose Apple could use the reporting device’s location and the relative distance of the AirTag to geolocate and then null out the data. It would be nice if they’d expose more of the implementation details, but I suppose it’s enough for them to just make the claim and then be sued for invasion of privacy if it turns out to be false. Yeah, without any collateral on the line, I don’t believe a word any corporation says. It’s actually stupid to since they can and do freely omit and mislead constantly. I watched it happen in front of my eyes with things I’ve worked on myself!