Real 3D or IMAX 3D?
good question
Real 3D(?), IMAX was $20/ticket... not going to pay that price to 'experiment 3D' it was the 3D movie in AMC Clearview theatre.
Real 3D or IMAX 3D?
good question
Johnny Depp as Mad Hatter reminded me way too much of myself and Willy Wonka, maybe its me, but you can tell he definitely used portions of his willy Wonka training for the Mad hatter.
Alice was good, it dragged in a couple spots but I left with a better understanding of the entire story line.
I have heard many interesting things about the movie, such as the post people making depps eyes 30% larger, all the green screen work, etc.
BUT
The trailers I have seen do not pique my interest in the slightest. Not at all.
I'll probably rent it, but it sounds pretty ho-hum from everything I have heard.
you mean you were able to get the story line that Tim Burton created? Although I didnt read the book, from what I have heard, Tim Burton's take on Alice is completely different than the book, where Alice remains a child.
I just got back from seeing it. It was ok and the story had its moments, however, I do not recommend it in 3D, it gets in the way. At one moment you are focusing on things floating, then the next everything goes blurry when the scene changes around. (brain/eye readjustments are not fast)
The Red Queen gets boring after a few scenes, the Mad Hatter also. Was it worth it? Yes, liked it and was fun/good to watch. In 3D? No. Tim Burton does not do 3D well or rather didn't film thinking in 3D.
i had a slight problem with the animal cruelty depicted in the film though. I called up my local WWF chapter and they said they were aware of the situation.
I'm not 100% on this, but I think everything iOrlando posts is a joke. He could be serious though...Is this a joke? Weren't all of the animals computer generated?
It just doesn't have any appeal to me
I saw the movie in 3D IMAX theater too which I think contibuted to a better experience altogether. The movie was ok but their pushing of feminism along with lots of historical errors made it less exciting than it could've been otherwise.
Technically, Victorian Age women were really pressured... in any case, Alice did recover what she felt she lost, her 'muchness'.
I can attack that movie's historical inaccuracies in so many ways that it will make a huge list. Some of them are outright ludicrous.
It's Alice in Wonderland. Were you also screaming at the screen, "A cat can't just disappear and float around like that! And all the animals are talking. That's impossible!"![]()
I can attack that movie's historical inaccuracies in so many ways that it will make a huge list. Some of them are outright ludicrous. Unfortunately to do so I must reveal some details in movie's plot and I don't want to spoil it for people who haven't seen it yet.
i saw this movie a few days ago.
all-in-all it was fine.
I did not think it was "weird" or "trippy" or any other adjective used to describe works by Tim Burton.
Johnny Depp as Mad Hatter reminded me way too much of myself and Willy Wonka, maybe its me, but you can tell he definitely used portions of his willy Wonka training for the Mad hatter.
alice was pretty cute. and I was surprised that Lindsay Lohan had campaigned somewhat vigorously for the role back in 08.
avatar was better though.
and i always knew that Johny Depp loved to futterwack vigorously.
i had a slight problem with the animal cruelty depicted in the film though. I called up my local WWF chapter and they said they were aware of the situation.
Yes, that's exactly what happened.
Jokes aside, I do realize it's a fairy tale but the author based it somewhat on real events and they should've been a bit more accurate. I'm definitely not a history expert but some things were very obvious even to me.
Claim-to-fame - I'm related (in a very loose way) to the person the book was based on.