Someone just design an iPhone holder for your wrist already and be done with it. No need for two devices.
Remember the iPhone X wasn’t the iPhone ex, or the XS wasn’t the “ex-es”, just like OS X wasn’t OS-ex. They were, respectively, the iPhone “ten”, iPhone “ten-es”, and OS “ten”.
So?
People who want the latest and greatest can buy the latest and greatest.
People who purchase a product and hold it can purchase the latest product with newest updates and hold it.
The only people who seem to lose out here are the people who are obsessed with buying the newest gear no matter what. That's a problem of their own, it's not reasonable to expect Apple to hold their hand and say "No, this product isn't for you".
No, everyone loses when the “latest and greatest” is a phone whose only innovation is to replace round edges with flat edges. Or a watch with a very slightly larger display.
What’s a millimeter? Let’s talk micronsWhat's an inch? Let's just talk millimetres.
I see tons of Apple Watches every day around and in the office.no one wears an apple watch anymore except for workouts. lean into the workouts. make the normal watch like the pro with longer battery, more rugged design etc.
I know it was for the anniversary, they skipped the iPhone ”nine” and went straight with the “ten”. However, what I wanted to point with my comment, is that the X was for “ten” and not for just a letter (“ex”). If Apple releases a series 10 (“ten”), it would make sense to release an Apple Watch X (“ten” as well), it should be followed by a Series 11.This isn't quite correct in the case of the iPhone. X was for the tenth anniversary, not for the 10th iteration. It was technically the 11th and there was no iPhone 9/9s.
Agree, next year is actually the tenth anniversary of the launch. We’ll see what they do, but I think the most important thing isn’t the name, but rather a better design, and powerful features such as sleep apnea detection and blood pressure monitoring.But I do agree it would be weird to have a 10 this year and an X the next, just not entirely unprecedented as next year is the de facto 10th anniversary of release. Yes, this year is the 10th anniversary of the announcement, which means Apple could go in a couple directions.
Already done and been around for a while nowSomeone just design an iPhone holder for your wrist already and be done with it. No need for two devices.
I will say that mine was at 78% and doing the $99 battery service was absolutely worth it. On rest days, I get sometimes get about 30-ish hours. And if I used low-power mode then I think I could get 2 full days.Man I'm glad you posted this. I'm on a series 6 and mulling over whether to upgrade this year or replace my battery as its at 80% and strugglign with my workouts and active days. I just don't know about the size of the ultra, but I need that battery life, hopefully they can reduce the bezels and keep the screen size and I think I'll get it.
Looks at Apple Watch, notoriously devoid of bezels, curves, tapers, and other design elements.
“Real watch” people are a bit fussy aren’t they?
because they’re spending a ton of money every year without getting new technology and only getting aesthetic changes. They’re getting ripped off.Why does everyone lose?
because they’re spending a ton of money ever year without getting new technology and only getting aesthetic changes. They’re getting ripped off.
Yeah, but they don't make it from a toilet material anymore 😁Ceramic would be an insta buy.
I would prefer something along the lines of an iPhone 16 pro mini and a bigger watch. Right now I feel like my 15 pro in blue is a spiritual successor to my beloved blue 12 mini, and the ultra 2 is an ok size, but could be a little bigger.Surely the constant striving to make displays bigger and bigger only applies to phones, iPads, desktops, and macbooks...
A watch cant just keep growing theres only so big a screen can be before it looks ridiculous and would be too big for most people's wrists.
The Ultra is seen as 'very big' and not everyone can pull it off - but to go bigger still?
If people have the income to upgrade every year, they are getting ripped off? Aren’t they making the decision? Who is forced to spend a “ton of money” to buy a new Apple product every year?because they’re spending a ton of money every year without getting new technology and only getting aesthetic changes. They’re getting ripped off.
If people have the income to upgrade every year, they are getting ripped off? Aren’t they making the decision? Who is forced to spend a “ton of money” to buy a new Apple product every year?
I know many are against it, but I still would love a round option. The samsung and pixel watches look so nice with a round face instead of the square. If nothing else, keep a square option and also make a round option.I am still holding on to my apple watch 4 ... every year I wait for a big design change to upgrade mine and every year I get disappointed .. let’s hope Apple Watch 10 is different !!!