Surely the constant striving to make displays bigger and bigger only applies to phones, iPads, desktops, and macbooks...
A watch cant just keep growing theres only so big a screen can be before it looks ridiculous and would be too big for most people's wrists.
The Ultra is seen as 'very big' and not everyone can pull it off - but to go bigger still?
From what i hear anyway, new connector didnt get the green light. Either too finnicky or not strong enough or not reliable or all of the above. Plus the PR of "going green" by making those millions of bands they produced useless.Interesting. Same strap connector?
I dont feel it's worth comparing yet because the final product can change, but mostly because 91mobiles decided to release perspective views and not orthographic screenshots like any sane person would. I don't think the crown and button on Series 10 are really all that off from Series 9.
Unless they want to add it to the lineup, but stop removing smaller options!STOP MAKING EVERYTHING BIGGER
That’s a spot on observation. Apple isn’t really going deep in any of their fitness metrics. It’s a scattershot offering that’s fairly broad but very shallow. And it’s only appealing to people casually interested in those areas. You aren’t going to be courting even amateur athletes. I’ve said it here before, but they aren’t close to approaching the inflection point of what Garmin or Coros offers in terms of training status and the deep statistical analysis of load and effort. Not to mention they will never offer things like Ant+ which is a staple of cycling connectivity. I can and often do cycle 100+ miles in a week and don’t need to stop and charge my Garmin. That’s with it keeping track of my cadence, speed, power meters and the GPS route. Apple is not even there for table stakes. But sure, they have some keynote with a “hip” exec doing a bmx stunt. And oh they added cycling -which is really lousy. In the cycling and triathlete groups I hang with there is certainly an argument about your Garmin and Coros preferences but Apple doesn’t even have a seat at that table. It’s very telling. This the Apple Watch Ultra is the epitome of an aspirational device with mid functionality.They need a whole rethink of the priorities if they want to capture much more of the fitness market at this point.
It hits a point where a Garmin or Coros, etc does basically everything better for the fitness focused (battery life very notably, but more buttons and a consistent UI+buttons/interactions that work in all situations easily).
The AW line could use a true divergence with 2-4 real options
I say "real", because they need to have actually focused products in this space ... not just such generalist approaches that "do everything" and are basically the same device over and over again and don't make any real design choices and tradeoffs to better optimize for niches
I am not going to lie, lying is pretty silly in a situation like this so no one should/would/could lie.I am not going to lie, i am rather disappointed. I wanted a big change just as iPhone X was.
I thought this might get me excited for the Apple Watch again but does not seem like that’ll happen for a while.
The watch really does not need a yearly release cycle.
That's what I thought when the first Apple Watch came out. Then I got one and realized the battery charge is not an issue because I charge it at night when I go to sleep just as I charge my phone. Thru 5 watches I've had now, not once did it not make thru the day.Do we really need a bigger display + thinner body on a watch that already has a miserable battery life (18 hours) ?
As someone heavily invested - happy if true!Looks like my Series 9
And my Series 8
And my Series 4
Pappa Apple knows best. How long did it take for them to do something rather basic like not arrange home screen icons on a grid? I’d encourage you to stop holding your breath. Breathe! The watch has plateau’d precisely because like the iPad Apple Watch doesn’t know what it wants to be when it grows up. It’s got some utility, sure, but it’s not gonna set the world on fire. Thus we get to the heart of apple’s Sisyphean trouble: they will never replicate the “lightning in a bottle” moment that is iPhone. Nothing they’ve produced since has had the level of focus and self-awareness. Not their headset, not the watch. Nothing really. You could be forgiven for saying “but Chungry, you forgot Apple silicon.” To which I would reply- ah yes, certainly the connective tissue is important but is aligned as an enabling technology born from the iPhone. Apple will never have this moment in time again, it’s high time they act like it. My worry is they can only lean into what they know- market efficiencies and the fabled unicorn cancer of forever growth. Until they drastically alter their toxic corporate culture there won’t be any meaningful change. I’d love to see them come back to their roots as a consumer products-focused company. But that ship has sailed and we are all left wistful, dabbing gauze at the thousands of cuts that actively mar the experience of using their products. Sadly for those without the lived experience Apple is great. Best it’s ever been. It’s sad and sobering to see how far they have fallen and become the thing they fought against for so long. The watch is mid. It always will be. I’ve accepted that fact. It has utility superficially but that’s it.I would love them to simply offer a watch face store for third party watch faces. I’m so tired of looking at the same ones every day.
You’re misunderstanding either “exact” or “literally”. Or both.This isn't an overhaul, it's literally the exact same watch as is currently on our wrists. And while this is certainly a personal opinion, I don't think a bigger watch is something most users have been clamouring for. The Extreme is already enormous. For me, an average size male, the 42mm size is my preference, as I don't need any more extra bulk on my person and don't want to look like a watch advertisement if I attempt to wear it somewhere nice. What I DO wish they would do is reintroduce the titanium finish or provide us with another elegant material option that isn't stainless.
Interesting. Same strap connector?
The watch really does not need a yearly release cycle.
None of apple’s hardware and software needs it, but they stubbornly stick to it.