Here are a few more renders from previous MacRumors articles. The first one actually looks pretty similar to the YouTuber's version. 3rd one is an actual Apple patent filing. Probably won't happen, but we can always hope.


And give up Apple's RAM/storage cash cow? Unlikely. The tech media will gush over the value of the base configuration while ignoring or zipping past the rapacious costs of more memory and storage.Please please please have user-expandable memory & storage.
Yeah - I posted in another thread that if you take the $1099 starting price of the current i5/8GB Mini as the base for a binned M1 Pro Mini, then work forward using BTO prices for RAM and CPU upgrades for the 14" MBP (including the "compulsory" RAM upgrades that come with the Pro and Max chips) you can easily get to te $2500+ mark for a M1 Max Mini, even without going for huge SSDs (I think 512GB is a sensible base for desktop machines).All along, I've been assuming Mac Mini PRO & MAX would be priced about like a MBpro 14" configuration minus about $500-$700 for the lid, keyboard, track pad, better speakers, etc.
Normally I’d say no way. But if this a more pro focused desktop… it’s not out of the question at least.Please please please have user-expandable memory & storage.
3rd one makes zero sense - it looks like a Trashcan - with vertical airflow with the 3D outer case from a Mac Pro - with horizontal airflow. Looks like a business-as-usual defensive patent covering every possible permutation of features.3rd one is an actual Apple patent filing.
Which is a shame. The trashcan is among my favorite designs. It might not be able to support the power requirements of a full on, no holds barred, Mac Pro, but seems appropriate for a studio machine like this.Anyway, I'd have thought that anything cylinder-shaped would have too much bad karma.
Yeah the only problem with the Trash Can Mac Pro is that it replaced the modular Mac Pro, it would have been just fine alongside the OG as an option.There are so many reasons they shouldn't, but I still would like to see them recreate the G4 Cube with modern innards...
Which is a shame. The trashcan is among my favorite designs. It might not be able to support the power requirements of a full on, no holds barred, Mac Pro, but seems appropriate for a studio machine like this.
That would be super boring design!
So. This IS the PEAK PERFORMANCE monster.
3rd one makes zero sense - it looks like a Trashcan - with vertical airflow with the 3D outer case from a Mac Pro - with horizontal airflow. Looks like a business-as-usual defensive patent covering every possible permutation of features.
It will likely have the M1 or M2 chip which has the memory on the chip instead of being something separate (general soc design just like portables) so memory thing is never going to happen. Storage on the other hand is still separate (though often soldered on the board in laptops).Please please please have user-expandable memory & storage.
This render looks just … YUUUUCK! ?Reminds me of the original Mac mini.
It may not be related to "struggling" at all, but rather getting peak performance out of the same chip with a more advanced cooling system that takes up much more space than what fits in a MacBook Pro.Sure, but the existing Mini design could accommodate a full-size desktop Intel i7 space heater and a more complex circuit board... I don't see it struggling with anything that currently fits into a MacBook Pro.
The rumored 2x chip maybe (...and that would also support twice the ports...)
I hate to tell you, but there is absolutely no way Apple is going to let anyone get access to the M1 Pro for only $1200.I sure hope this is not accurate. I was hoping for a Mac Mini with an M1 Pro for around $1,200, but this would obviously be way more expensive, like $2,500 +![]()
Didn’t some YouTuber shove the internals of an iMac mini into a case that was 30% smaller, and the performance was the same?Or it was a way to dramatically increase the cooling of the 2013 Mac Pro to address that "thermal corner" they had backed themselves into.