So, while I appreciate that the iPad Pro is a larger tablet with a lot more power. What is it going to run that makes it "Pro"? It will still be running apps from the App Store (a lot of these apps still don't take advantage of the potential of the iPad Air 2.) so I really don't understand how it is "Pro" in any way, shape or form?
Most other tablet in the class of the iPad Pro run desktop OS and desktop applications. And have great storage capacities.
Also the fact that apple decide to make a 32GB and 128GB is just a slap to the consumer. Why no 64GB? 32GB is barely enough nowadays yet you either have to get by with 32GB or pay big bucks for the 128GB.
This product to me (purely opinion) seems like a money grabbing gimmick.
Well, let's deconstruct this:
"What is it going to run that makes it "Pro"?" - Others have pointed out that the term 'Pro' is purely subjective, and Apple has consistently used this moniker to indicate something that is bigger, better, and more capable than the 'normal' dingus. So, 'Macbook Pro' is a bigger, more capable device than a 'Macbook'. I use a Macbook Pro because I like the 15" screen, and it encodes videos fast enough. No, I'm not a 'pro' video editor.
"Most other tablet in the class of the iPad Pro run desktop OS and desktop applications. And have great storage capacities." - Well, the only tablets I know of that fits your description boils down to one: the Microsoft Surface Pro. The SP4 is getting some pretty good reviews, but most reviewers like it as an ultraportable laptop more than a tablet. It's screen aspect ratio makes it awkward to use in portrait mode and the mouse-sized targets make a stylus pretty much a necessity (thus, they've included the stylus in the box). So, no, I don't think that 'other tablet' is in the class of the IPP - the SP4 is a tablet PC, and the IPP is a tablet. Different beast.
Now, compare the IPP to any current Android tablet, and you're closer to an apples-to-apples comparison, even though there's no current Android tablet (to my knowledge) with the screen size or processor horsepower of the IPP.
And about storage: I'd prefer more storage, sure, but more chips in the device means more battery drain, and Apple is pretty good about figuring out what gives the best mix of economy, battery life and feature set. Not sure how the decision to go with two storage tiers is a slap at anyone - if you don't like it, don't buy it.
There are lots of folks that have looked at the IPP and have decided, for one reason or another, that it's not for them. Others are ready to put down their money, sight unseen. My guess is that it won't be a runaway hit, but that it will have a sizable and enthusiastic following, a few tentpole apps that take advantage of the bigger screen, the pencil and the improved CPU, and that we will most certainly see an IPP2 that builds on the strengths of this device in a year or two.
Not joking.