More like unquestionably monopolizing.Yes, they got into the top few by becoming unquestionably dominant in both retail and cloud computing.
More like unquestionably monopolizing.Yes, they got into the top few by becoming unquestionably dominant in both retail and cloud computing.
In retail maybe, not in cloud.More like unquestionably monopolizing.
You make a good point - my understanding is the main difference is that a Web app is essentially sandboxed, it doesn't have hardware or software access to the device or its operating system, at least not to the same level as an app.
The other issue is how could Apple define something running in a browser being against its terms of service, and how to enforce it?
Yeah but I would trust my data with Apple more than Amazon.Apple would never take a risk like that...
I paid £50 for one of those iMac just to sit in my lounge and look gorgeous. Love it
There's no reason to trust it with either.Yeah but I would trust my data with Apple more than Amazon.
I'm doubt many can sleep through a drone flying around their house so you won't be getting much sleep if your Amazon drone patrols during that time.Imagine waking up in the middle of the night and seeing your newly bought amazon drone camera recording you while you're sleeping.
Apple doesn't care about your personal data. Who would they even sell it to?There's no reason to trust it with either.
They don't run in the browser on iOS. They could do exactly the same, but they don't want to.So what is different about this than xCloud or Stadia other than it runs in a browser? Isn’t the functionality essentially the same? So Apple doesn’t need to review every game or take 30% of subs if you’re accessing it via Safari and not a Luna Cloud iOS app? And all the concerns about privacy and safety no longer exist?
Who would Amazon sell it to? Apple and Amazon both have internal uses for user data. Also, with every big tech company moving into every space, you don't know what they're going to use the stash for later.Apple doesn't care about your personal data. Who would they even sell it to?
At a quick glance the Show almost looked like an old iMac... which was the best designed iMac IMHO
That always home drone thing is just CREEPY and I am saying this as a echo owner
My cat will do everything in his power to take down that drone if I got it
But the bullets will have to be really, really small.Here's a scenario that Amazon apparently envisioned. Version 2 will have a minigun and a booming voice saying "you have 20 seconds to comply" when confronting the burglar.
"Maximum Overdrive?"It's totally out of a bad 80's horror movie that I can't recall the name too. It took place in the future and had smart homes with smart robots and appliances that turned homicidal. I can see that Ring device being the reboot.
Apple can only use that data to make their products better through innovation while Amazon has built an entire store to use that data for advertisers and to fulfill government requests that break privacy laws.Who would Amazon sell it to? Apple and Amazon both have internal uses for user data. Also, with every big tech company moving into every space, you don't know what they're going to use the stash for later.
well Arm might give you a little hint
No matter how you phrase it, they use that data to sell things. Apple also fulfills government requests, like everyone else. Seriously anyone who cares about privacy should safeguard it themselves.Apple can only use that data to make their products better through innovation while Amazon has built an entire store to use that data for advertisers and to fulfill government requests that break privacy laws.
The world doesn't work in black and white as you portray it. If one really cares about security and privacy, "Safeguard it yourself" means live completely off the grid and use no technology. That is unacceptable for 99.9% of the population. And on the other hand, telling someone to "safeguard it yourself" is near impossible for young adults, elders and many technologically illiterate folks. Do you really not care about the millions of these people too?No matter how you phrase it, they use that data to sell things. Apple also fulfills government requests, like everyone else. Seriously anyone who cares about privacy should safeguard it themselves.
Yes, except most people are on the extreme where they trust every company with their info or trust a few with anything. There are easy ways you can avoid giving out unnecessary info, and one of them is *not* spending large amounts of money to install mic-capable smart speakers all over your house for no real purpose.The world doesn't work in black and white as you portray it. If one really cares about security and privacy, "Safeguard it yourself" means live completely off the grid and use no technology. That is unacceptable for 99.9% of the population. And on the other hand, telling someone to "safeguard it yourself" is near impossible for young adults, elders and many technologically illiterate folks. Do you really not care about the millions of these people too?
Different companies have earned levels of security and privacy trust with consumers. No one lives completely off the grid or entirely on either. As adults, we make choices for ourselves and our children that usually starts with the companies we choose to support and engage with. I don't know anyone that would go all in on every Facebook product because they have a terrible reputation. I do know some that would go all in on every Apple product and no one else because Apple is more transparent and trustworthy to them. No one company is perfect so people choose a variety of companies and products and services that they feel comfortable with.
Sunflower-iMac mini! (a few years late!)
NO Doubt, Apple is more trustworthy than Amazon! In terms of data privacy, I'd rank the big five: 1) Apple 2)Microsoft 3)Amazon 4)Google 5)FacebookYeah but I would trust my data with Apple more than Amazon.