Even if they're true facts....question is, why do they actually have to define their product by comparing it, i.e. pointing out how much better it is? Isn't it good enough to be bought just for the sake of being good enough?
Has a bitter taste in my opinion.
Why don't you ask Phil Schiller the same thing.... why do they actually have to define their product by comparing it...
They actually quoted Gizmodo!!! I can't wait until next year for the next Fire and Nexus 7. We know that Amazon is not backing down from a fight.
Why don't you ask Phil Schiller the same thing.
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-19736_...ecking-phil-schiller-on-ipad-mini-vs-nexus-7/
Even if they're true facts....question is, why do they actually have to define their product by comparing it, i.e. pointing out how much better it is? Isn't it good enough to be bought just for the sake of being good enough?
Has a bitter taste in my opinion.
What is not mentioned, is the user experience, the OS responsiveness, the number of apps available, and the quality of apps.
As for number of apps available, Google may actually overtake Apple in that area soon. They were "within striking distance" a month ago.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57521252-94/can-apples-app-store-maintain-its-lead-over-google-play/
Amazon could have brought up the whole Maps fiasco but didn't...
Because the Kindle Fire HD has superior turn by turn navigation to the iPhone 5? And actually, Apple Maps are pretty great for being a brand new thing. At least where I live, every bit as good as Google's turn by turn on my Galaxy Nexus.
Because the Kindle Fire HD has superior turn by turn navigation to the iPhone 5? And actually, Apple Maps are pretty great for being a brand new thing. At least where I live, every bit as good as Google's turn by turn on my Galaxy Nexus.