Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That Headline Gore tho.

> Amazon Joins Apple as U.S.'s Second Trillion Dollar Company

There, I fixed it.
 
Wow, only 1/21 the debt of our ENTIRE nation....take that for thought.

Right, which is why, arguably, the U.S. debt isn't that big a deal. Crazy as that sounds, the U.S. produces some incredibly valuable companies. So it presumably can handle the current debt load relatively easily.
Of course if the debt always goes up, then eventually it will be a huge problem. And there seems to be little ability by the government leaders to agree on a means to lower the U.S. debt, so the debt increasing rapidly seems likely.
[doublepost=1536084736][/doublepost]
All else being equal, AAPL would be much higher than the current $1.1T had they not done the buybacks and dividends the last several years. If all that cash was still in the coffers, the market cap would be a few hundred billion more.

AAPL is finally trading at 20+ P/E. IMO, it's still trading at a significant discount (I feel ~ 25 P/E is fairer) and should outperform the market in the next several years.

AMZN, on the other hand, keeps defying my expectations. Surely I wished that I had bought a few hundred shares back in the 90's. Hell, I shoulda bought a bunch a year ago. It trades at such a high P/E, that I'm afraid that at some point, the "market" will demand AMZN to show profits. Then the stock won't be able to support such high P/E ratios (convoluted wall street logic).

The buybacks decreased the number of shares outstanding, which ties in directly to the P/E metric you cite as too low. I suspect they helped increase AAPL's market cap more than just having the cash sitting around.

AMZN is crazy. I also wonder when Wall Street will look for it to show profits. But I guess as long as the growth potential exists, it can keep the stock price high. When your "story" is taking over all commerce through web traffic sales, and you keep making progress year after year towards that, then you have a heck of a story.
 
I don't get the market's infatuation with Amazon and their paper thin margins. Here is a little comparison via CNBC:

[Apple] generated a $48.35 billion profit during its fiscal 2017 and made $13.8 billion in net income during the March 2018 quarter, while Amazon's total net income since inception is about $9.6 billion.
Apple, made more profit in one quarter than Amazon has made...ever.

Doesn’t really matter. The current stock price is nothing but the public’s expectation for a company’s earning potential in the future. The price reflects the price, current investors are willing to pay for the stocks. As such, they have basically missed out on the past profits and only care about the future.
The past net income only matters in that it is one of the metrics to determine future earning potential.
 
Carl Icahn probably still thinks Apple's undervalued. Probably wouldn't be happy until Apple's stock priced raised to BRK-A levels (currently 316900 as I write this). Since market cap = stock price * outstanding shares, that means Apple would be worth over $1,500 trillion.
 
Apple's not the first, people buy headlines.

The Dutch East India Company was the world’s first trillion dollar company by far, I think in current valuation it’d be worth $9 trillion or something close to that.

However, this headline says Amazon is the second U.S. company to reach $1 trillion.
 
The stock is overpriced at this point just like prime. $120 up front for “free” shipping is highway robbery now that most other retailers offer real free shipping. Walmart is generally cheaper to boot.

And prime video and their paltry music service is definitely not worth $10/month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: montycat and tonyr6
Maybe Jeff will celebrate and give his workers one cent an hour race.
I'm not holding my breath.
 
The buybacks decreased the number of shares outstanding, which ties in directly to the P/E metric you cite as too low. I suspect they helped increase AAPL's market cap more than just having the cash sitting around.
It's all theoretical anyway, however, the buybacks also removed that amount of cash out of the market cap. Buybacks and dividends shouldn't affect the P/E precisely because the metric is on a per share basis.

But yes, the market was punishing AAPL for having too much cash lying around, so they had to do something with it. And since they couldn't find anything worthwhile to buy with it, they started paying back to the shareholders.
 
Wow, Amazon's share prices are $2000 compared to Apple's $200? That's surprising.

That said, Amazon haven't had a stock split, though even with that in account it's still a huge difference. It just shows how comparatively low Apple's market valuation is.
Apple has had several stock splits in their history. If Apple never had one, they’d be above $2000/share also
 
The Dutch East India Company was the world’s first trillion dollar company by far, I think in current valuation it’d be worth $9 trillion or something close to that.

However, this headline says Amazon is the second U.S. company to reach $1 trillion.

True, however.. "A good friend once told me, you are memory, without them we equal nothing"
 
Wow, Amazon's share prices are $2000 compared to Apple's $200? That's surprising.

That said, Amazon haven't had a stock split, though even with that in account it's still a huge difference. It just shows how comparatively low Apple's market valuation is.

pzv5j7l.jpg
 
Wow, Amazon's share prices are $2000 compared to Apple's $200? That's surprising.

That said, Amazon haven't had a stock split, though even with that in account it's still a huge difference. It just shows how comparatively low Apple's market valuation is.
Stock split
 
Wow, Amazon's share prices are $2000 compared to Apple's $200? That's surprising.

That said, Amazon haven't had a stock split, though even with that in account it's still a huge difference. It just shows how comparatively low Apple's market valuation is.


Yikes! The things that people think doesn't surprise me anymore... Someone will do better than me to point out the error in your thinking... I hope!
 
I like Apple better than Amazon since hearing on the news that Amazon allows sellers to falsify country of origin labeling on products sold through Amazon. They are violating the spirit of the truth in labeling law if not the letter of the law but pending legislation and/or a pending executive order will both fix the loophole that allows companies like Amazon and their sellers to circumvent the law.
 
Last edited:
Are you? Amazon, in all of its existence, made less money than Apple does in the average quarter.

And no, things aren’t getting much better: in Europe they increased sales but also losses, for example.

AMZN is hugely overpriced, while Apple shares are still undervalued at just 20x PE not even considering the huge mountain of cash they are amassing.

That’s precisely why Buffett loaded on AAPL and doesn’t own a single AMZN share.


Remember thought that a LOT of folks here erroneously believe a stock split 2:1 will instantly double your investment, and this other guy who thinks a $2000 share price means the company is much bigger than the $200 share price company. - You know what I mean.... The best stock analysts are not even far off from this same mis-informed mentality.
 
Amazon made this much by exploiting workers and sacrificing workplace safety and sanitation whereas Apple achieved it first while treating both employees and customers well.
 
Amazon will forever always be known as the 2nd trillion dollar company.:p

Actually, Chinese oil company was the first (though not for long) a while back. Apple was second (but the first US) company to reach $1 trillion.
[doublepost=1536091973][/doublepost]
Amazon made this much by exploiting workers and sacrificing workplace safety and sanitation whereas Apple achieved it first while treating both employees and customers well.
Are you kidding? Have you read about Foxconn workers (who manufacture iPhones) jumping to death from the roof of the factory?
 
The stock is overpriced at this point just like prime. $120 up front for “free” shipping is highway robbery now that most other retailers offer real free shipping. Walmart is generally cheaper to boot.

And prime video and their paltry music service is definitely not worth $10/month.
You're not using it don't kbow all the prime benefits which is why you think it's expensive.
 
Right, which is why, arguably, the U.S. debt isn't that big a deal. Crazy as that sounds, the U.S. produces some incredibly valuable companies. So it presumably can handle the current debt load relatively easily.

The fourth largest annual budget item is paying just the interest accrued on the national debt. To be clear, that $310B budget item isn't paying off any of the debt, it's just paying to kick the can down the road one more year, at which time we will do the exact same thing again except it will be even bigger.

To put that $310 billion interest payment in perspective, NASA's 2018 budget is $19 billion and the US Army's 2017 budget was $148 billion. It seems like a "big deal" to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ani4ani
Amazon will forever always be known as the 2nd trillion dollar company.:p
....and the company that achieved the feat in 18 years less than it took Apple....and also sans bailouts
[doublepost=1536092761][/doublepost]
Amazon made this much by exploiting workers and sacrificing workplace safety and sanitation whereas Apple achieved it first while treating both employees and customers well.
You really believe that don’t you!
 
"World's second trillion dollar US company" is a poorly written title.

That's like saying the "world's largest US city". Why don't you just say the "largest US city"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rafark
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.