Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"With Better Sound" Yeah, so where is the in-depth review video of this device. Oh, you haven't heard it yet? That's what I thought. Looks like it should sound better than a potato.
 
HomePod is dead in the water....

People don’t care about quality sound, mp3 proved all that years ago.. What else sells it to joe public for that price?

If you can buy three of these for 2/3 the price of the HomePod, with a device that is in a mature stage of generation then it’s as dead as the Apple TV (and I’ve got one of those!).
Unless the drop the price before launch by half!
 
"With Better Sound" Yeah, so where is the in-depth review video of this device. Oh, you haven't heard it yet? That's what I thought. Looks like it should sound better than a potato.

Are you talking about Apple's marketing claim about better sound or this one? Because BOTH have had that said about them by the respective entity trying to sell them. Or is only Amazon's marketing claim of "better sound" questionable?

I share your opinion of Siri, but in my experience Alexa is equally bad. Frankly none of the current crop of virtual assistants seem very good - Google's is probably the best of them, but that's damning with faint praise.

And Google makes a similar announcement about improved speakers in a new model of their version: https://9to5google.com/2017/09/27/e...higher-end-google-home-max-w-stereo-speakers/

As I mentioned earlier in this thread, adjusting speaker quality is almost child's play. If neither Amazon's or Google's turns out to be objectively superior to Apple's, it's not hard for them to roll out yet another version with even better speakers. Think about buying a car with factory speakers and then swapping them out for better ones. It's just not a huge ordeal to slug in a better speaker(s).

The magic is probably not in the speaker quality but in the proprietary software IMO. That means Siri needs to step it up and soundly roar ahead of Alexa and Google. If it really ends up as just (speaker) hardware vs. hardware, I don't think Apple can win unless one is mostly sold on which brand mark is tacked onto each device. I have to believe Apple held something back (about Siri and/or the software) in the preview reveal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: collegitdept
Amazon's biggest weapon is not hardware. It is the catalog of providers of hardware, goods, and services they have lined up, and the huge amount of customer preference data they have. They know people buying habits better than that person's spouse, or perhaps even the person themselves. And the Alexa system is a AI based portal into this data. It knows your favorite pizza, the detergent you buy, the books you read, the model computer or phone you own, etc. And with voice ordering "Alexa, order my favorite pizza (or soap or new usb cable for your phone or ...)" they are going to make billions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VMMan and Foggydog
You honestly believe more expensive means better??

I didn't say that. But do you honestly believe a $99 voice assistant is really going to outperform a $349 home music device? This isn't about price tag, it's about the purpose and design of the product.

The Echo wasn't designed specifically to play music. It doesn't have a powerful processor with optimized audio playback software. It has a single small tweeter and a small sub. The HomePod has an A8X processor, beam-forming tech for high quality music playback, 7 tweeters and a 4" high-precision sub, all designed to work together and created specifically to play music.

Do you honestly believe that this new Echo Plus will produce better quality audio than the HomePod?
 
Another thing they announced today was the Echo Spot. A small clock device that has a camera for video calls and Alexa commanding as the Dot does. Also like the Dot and Echo 2 it supports external bluetooth speakers.

For $130 I suspect this will be in my house very soon.
[doublepost=1506550746][/doublepost]
With AirPlay 2 coming I think Apple is actually the better option for whole home audio. You can get a speaker from any manufacturer that supports Airplay 2 and can integrate it into your system. With Sonos however, you're locked into their speakers which are very expensive for what you get. With AirPlay 2, you can also use an Apple TV in your entertainment center where you may already have a 5.1 setup.

In addition to their own speakers, the Amazon Echo 2 and Echo dot already support any bluetooth speakers you have. And you can say "Alexa play <insert song/artist/playlist> everywhere" and it plays the song through all of the speakers and Echo devices, or you can just play it on the speakers connected to a single echo.
 
Last edited:
Apple, wtf are you doing... Echo Plus, Echo Spot, Echo Show... and that's from a company who became a hardware company just 10 years ago and the Echo itself is just 3 years old. Amazon bakes Echo devices like hot cakes.

And here comes Apple with the bulky pathetic HomePod whose only advantages are presumably better sound and definitely higher price. No, there's no HomePod Video, HomePod Spot, HomePod Dot. Maybe in 5 years, or 10. Who knows.
By the time Amazon releases a holographic Echo 3D, we'll probably get a HomePod Gold Edition with some luxury fabric shells at $99 each.
 
Certainly not a game changer, but since it's priced $100, I might be willing to give this a try as an upgrade to my first gen Echo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Apple2007
Are you talking about Apple's marketing claim about better sound or this one? Because BOTH have had that said about them by the respective entity trying to sell them. Or is only Amazon's marketing claim of "better sound" questionable?



And Google makes a similar announcement about improved speakers in a new model of their version: https://9to5google.com/2017/09/27/e...higher-end-google-home-max-w-stereo-speakers/

As I mentioned earlier in this thread, adjusting speaker quality is almost child's play. If neither Amazon's or Google's turns out to be objectively superior to Apple's, it's not hard for them to roll out yet another version with even better speakers. Think about buying a car with factory speakers and then swapping them out for better ones. It's just not a huge ordeal to slug in a better speaker(s).

The magic is probably not in the speaker quality but in the proprietary software IMO. That means Siri needs to step it up and soundly roar ahead of Alexa and Google. If it really ends up as just (speaker) hardware vs. hardware, I don't think Apple can win unless one is mostly sold on which brand mark is tacked onto each device. I have to believe Apple held something back (about Siri and/or the software) in the preview reveal.


This is exactly correct and sadly my perception of the recent Apple under Tim Cook: Apple moving in the direction of being more of a Hardware pure-play company.

People forget (and IMO clearly so does Tim Cook) that Apple is actually a *SOFTWARE* company that *monetizes* from hardware. But Tim Cook is a physical operations/supply chain guy .... he simply doesn't understand software (hence why software has essentially been gutted/taken a backseat as each year passes by)

There should be no doubt that without *STRONG* software play, Apple hardware simply can't compete and fails (Apple TV)... and so will HomePod

The problem with HomePod is that it's a commodity speaker that ANYONE can produce... locked to the *worst* software/service Siri that's simply an embarrassment to most people's eyes (except fanboys living in delusion).

This is not good. In fact, more telling is that Apple's software/service is so bad now that it's actually a liability that hurts their price premium pricing power. How much more would the value rise for HomePod or AirPods if it wasn't locked to Siri and you could use Alexa, Cortana, or Google Assistant?

Because services ate software, (nearly all software is backed by cloud services & becoming intelligent with data) Apple is really going to struggle. China really is an indicator of Apple's future struggles. Apple hardware locked to Apple's *VERY" poor services is a *HINDRANCE* not a positive.

Moreover, it's pretty clear that the current Apple with current management simply do not have the appropriate resources (talent) desire, and most critically *data* to ever make Siri competitive for a sustainable period of time. You can thank Apple's ridiculous privacy policy ideology for that (they're basically blind.... but on purpose)

Hence why you get stupid justifications by poor leaders like Greg saying "Siri wasn't engineered for trivial pursuit" as rational to double-down on making Siri even dumber... but with a nicer voice

(Apple fans, enjoy hearing "I'm sorry I didn't get that" or completely wrong answers from Siri... but in a nicer voice!)
 
I didn't say that. But do you honestly believe a $99 voice assistant is really going to outperform a $349 home music device? This isn't about price tag, it's about the purpose and design of the product.

You're saying because it's $349 it will be better than the $99 one. You are exactly saying more expensive automatically means better.

Well the $185 Prada paper clip doesn't do anything better than the 1 cent paperclip from staples. It just has a name stamped on it.

And all we know for sure about the HomePod is it's going to have a much fatter margin than any other voice assistant speaker on the market.
 
Every device you've used Siri on so far has had a single very tiny microphone. The HomePod has a whole bunch of larger microphones, carefully arranged to listen to anywhere in the room (the Amazon and Google speaker/assistants also have multiple microphones). Siri will hear much more clearly on the HomePod, getting rid of one of her two problems. She may still be ditzy about comprehending and answering, we don't know yet, that remains to be seen - if they have substantial improvements in that area, they may be waiting for the HomePod to reveal them.


This is possibly the biggest (and lamest) delusional excuse by Apple fanboys.... wishing for this being the reason Siri is so pathetically awful.

No. Just no.

Siri being stupid isn't because of hardware. Hardware isn't its problem.

Siri is so abysmally bad because awful AI services.... THIS is a data service problem.

Apple doesn't have data (because they blinded themselves to data with their asinine privacy ideology that went WAY overboard)

Nor does Apple have an even decent cloud backend infrastructure
 
Certainly not a game changer, but since it's priced $100, I might be willing to give this a try as an upgrade to my first gen Echo.

Option 2 is to get a Echo Dot for $49 to 29$, depending on sale, and get a nice Bluetooth speaker to pair it with.
 
Have not heard the HomePod yet, but I am not sure how a single woofer and tweeter can duplicate the sound field that Apple supposedly can produce. Granted I am still skeptical of Apple’s abilities, but I have been in rooms at sound labs where companies created impressive sound fields from a single device in a small location. If done properly, reflecting off of walls and such (as Apple claims they can do), can sound impressive. In the case of the demo, aim and timing was key for a good sound field.

Is it room filling concert sound? No, but, still sounded better than a single directed driver.
[doublepost=1506552831][/doublepost]Check out the HomePod page specs on Apple before claiming that it only has ONE tweeter... https://www.apple.com/homepod/
 
It would be a smart idea to refresh the Airport products to bridge this gap...

...and I have NO need for a Homepod with my Airport Express plugged into my very nice Bang and Olufsen speakers... in stereo.
 
It would be a smart idea to refresh the Airport products to bridge this gap...

...and I have NO need for a Homepod with my Airport Express plugged into my very nice Bang and Olufsen speakers... in stereo.

AirPort Express' ability to drive speakers is vastly underrated.

A lot of people seem to be missing the point when they do these direct comparisons of speaker quality between the Echo and the HomePod. The Echo's speaker doesn't matter as much as one might think because it integrates with a lot of existing speakers out there already. A friend of mine uses his Echo Dot to launch Spotify on a connected set of speakers - and even on his computer.

Disclaimer: I don't want any of these "always on" devices in my home. I've seem them in use, and I've used the Echo and Google offerings a little - I don't think they're really there yet (in terms of the AI). Additionally, I don't see what problem they're trying to solve. But if I was going to get one, it would probably be Apple simply due to privacy considerations.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fuchal
In addition to their own speakers, the Amazon Echo 2 and Echo dot already support any bluetooth speakers you have. And you can say "Alexa play <insert song/artist/playlist> everywhere" and it plays the song through all of the speakers and Echo devices, or you can just play it on the speakers connected to a single echo.

In which case it's more like AirPlay 2 than Sonos. My point is that speaker agnostic solutions are better than ones that lock you into one manufacturer, i.e. Sonos et al.
 
In which case it's more like AirPlay 2 than Sonos. My point is that speaker agnostic solutions are better than ones that lock you into one manufacturer, i.e. Sonos et al.


Then you're talking about the wrong company

Open commodity standards... isn't what Apple does. They're a proprietary software company that builds platforms that locks you in.

Which is why Tim Cook pushing Apple to become more of a hardware pure-play [that rapidly becomes commoditized without software platform] is so baffling and bad for the company overall.

It's also why HomePod will not be a sustainable long term success... but repeat of Apple TV (but much worse)

He really needs to go. His expertise and knowledge is not what Apple needs going forward.
 
Then you're talking about the wrong company

Open commodity standards... isn't what Apple does. They're a proprietary software company that builds platforms that locks you in.

Which is why Tim Cook pushing Apple to become more of a hardware pure-play [that rapidly becomes commoditized without software platform] is so baffling and bad for the company overall.

It's also why HomePod will not be a sustainable long term success... but repeat of Apple TV (but much worse)

He really needs to go. His expertise and knowledge is not what Apple needs going forward.

Sounds like you're talking about a different issue than what I'm talking about.
 
Option 2 is to get a Echo Dot for $49 to 29$, depending on sale, and get a nice Bluetooth speaker to pair it with.
Keep in mind you can't use bluetooth speakers with multi-room audio, which is an important feature for a lot of people.
 
Alexa dot + surround sound beats anything that comes out of HomePod.
Do people actually want a single speaker style design(I know it’s multiple).
I’d rather use that money to build a surround sound for my tv entertainment center and have an assistant for home controls.
 
Actually, I do. I work from home 95% of the time, so having a land-land (VoIP) provides more consistent sound quality plus I can use better equipment for talking. For me, having something like the Echo-Connect is a great idea!

In addition, many of us have older parents. I'll put one or two of these at my mothers house and cheerfully pay for a land-line just so I can call and she can answer without having to do anything but say "Alexa... answer". That's a HUGE safety and security feature.

Thank you VERY MUCH. My mom is 77 and living alone. Until I can move closer. From what I understand, could my mom say, Hey Alexa, call the 911, if she falls or needs some other help? She could also SS, Hey Alexa, cal Peter? Please let me know if I understanding this correctly. Thx
[doublepost=1506556627][/doublepost]
Alexa dot + surround sound beats anything that comes out of HomePod.
Do people actually want a single speaker style design(I know it’s multiple).
I’d rather use that money to build a surround sound for my tv entertainment center and have an assistant for home controls.

How about Alexa dot with 2 or more Sonos speakers?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.