Right, but RIM's intellectual property is damn near worthless without a consumer ecosystem in place. It's possible that Amazon could acquire that IP and make it valuable.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Amazon Planning to Take on Apple in Smartphone Market
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Right, but RIM's intellectual property is damn near worthless without a consumer ecosystem in place. It's possible that Amazon could acquire that IP and make it valuable.
One word: Competition, my dear friends, competition.
Always a good thing.
Because there's currently no competition in the smartphone market? Ask Nokia how good competition is.
"A smartphone would give Amazon a wider range of low-priced hardware devices..."
The Kindle Fire didn't exactly take on the iPad....
Don't think the FireFone or whatever it'll be called will take on the iPhone.
Apple = high-end consumer market
Amazon = lower-end consumer market
Not the same market.
The Kindle Fire didn't exactly take on the iPad....
Don't think the FireFone or whatever it'll be called will take on the iPhone.
Apple = high-end consumer market
Amazon = lower-end consumer market
Not the same market.
"...acquire a portfolio of patents..."
Awesome! More patent legality news! I enjoy reading about arguments about who owns existing IPs instead of new innovations.
Awesome! More patent legality news! I enjoy reading about arguments about who owns existing IPs instead of new innovations.
The Kindle Fire isn't an "Android" device. Amazon does not call it an Android device. In fact, they are legally barred from calling it an "Android" device so I'm not sure why MacRumors is calling it that.
Android is a brand name and Kindle isn't an Android device. It's just as wrong as calling any tissue a Kleenex.
While I do think competition is healthy, I don't think this is the correct arena for Amazon. I love Amazon as an online retailer, I don't think they will be replacing my iPhone anytime soon. I'd have to be able to use it for a week or so before I pass final judgement tho.
more competition is a beautiful thing.
as an Apple customer, i can expect products to be developed faster, better, and with more innovative features
----------
they're not likely to win over any die-hard Apple customers who have owned an iPhone since 2009...but they are likely to win over people fed up with Android phones with horrendous support
as an Apple customer, i can expect products to be developed faster, better, and with more innovative features
----------
they're not likely to win over any die-hard Apple customers who have owned an iPhone since 2009...but they are likely to win over people fed up with Android phones with horrendous support
I am not certain I understand (should this be true) the reasoning behind this.
Amazon does things very well, and the phone business is not remotely one of them. *other than selling phones made by others*
Of course, the same could be true of Apple in 07'; but they are already a hardware and software direct supplier- Amazon sells the tablets to shop in their store.
IDK, I just don't see a justification for Jeff to step foot in these muddied waters; but who knows.
Amazon does things very well, and the phone business is not remotely one of them. *other than selling phones made by others*
Of course, the same could be true of Apple in 07'; but they are already a hardware and software direct supplier- Amazon sells the tablets to shop in their store.
IDK, I just don't see a justification for Jeff to step foot in these muddied waters; but who knows.
...
There is no reason this couldnt work because the android hardware currently out is missing what people want. A thin device that is comfotable to hold and has killer battery life. The ones on the market are either too big to hold easily, have poor battery life or are thick and heavy, or a combination of the three
There is no reason this couldnt work because the android hardware currently out is missing what people want. A thin device that is comfotable to hold and has killer battery life. The ones on the market are either too big to hold easily, have poor battery life or are thick and heavy, or a combination of the three
As an Apple customer of more than a few months you should be aware that competition is NOT what does anything at Apple. They don't do as or when the other boys do. On timetables, features etc.
Possibly because of the name association. With the Kindle Fire, Amazon took Google's software, adapted it, and created a product that is associated in the consumer's mind with Amazon, not with Google. And I suppose an Amazon smartphone would do the same. Amazon also doesn't have any interest in letting Google take financial advantage of the fact that a customer would buy an Android phone. I wouldn't think that Google gets too much in advertising money via Kindle Fire buyers.
For Apple to create an iPhone was a move forward, they made a great change to the industry and they had a great background succeeding after the iPod.
Amazon... they are experimenting, is not an "evolution" for them, is a "market share and a business". Is almost like like Ford or Adidas selling smartphones too.
I still do not have an iPhone but you bet I won't get one from Amazon.
Amazon... they are experimenting, is not an "evolution" for them, is a "market share and a business". Is almost like like Ford or Adidas selling smartphones too.
I still do not have an iPhone but you bet I won't get one from Amazon.
Apple didn't jump on the netbook bandwagon, their notebooks and desktops are priced at non-competing price points to the rest of the market yet they still manage to make it work. Apple competes for your new dollars by developing new products, they don't have knee-jerk reactions to what others are doing. That doesn't make them saintly, just focused.
Isn't that what the iphone already is? How many of us just talk on our phones anymore?
Does it not run a modified android os? Sure you would never call OSX and Ubuntu the same but they are still both Unix spinoffs no?
Is the kindle fire OS not an Android spinoff ?
Jeff Bezos
…is a wily competitor. There were dozens of Android me too tablets before the Fire came out.
Sure, he's losing money on each unit, but he's the only competitor with a popular retail operation attached to it.
He'll do something ballsy with the phone too - it'll be cheap, it'll be "good enough", and it will sell you stuff from his store.
Bezos has no choice - this either works for him, or Apple eats his lunch slowly but surely.
…is a wily competitor. There were dozens of Android me too tablets before the Fire came out.
Sure, he's losing money on each unit, but he's the only competitor with a popular retail operation attached to it.
He'll do something ballsy with the phone too - it'll be cheap, it'll be "good enough", and it will sell you stuff from his store.
Bezos has no choice - this either works for him, or Apple eats his lunch slowly but surely.
"A smartphone would give Amazon a wider range of low-priced hardware devices that bolster its strategy of making money from digital books..."
Doesn't Amazon lose money on digital books?? They monopolize(d) the e-book market by lowballing prices, knowing they'll make it up everyewhere else, including sales of Kindles. This established strategy of using it's market power to undercut competitive pricing (fighting against which Apple, et al, have been rewarded by being indicted by the USDOJ) makes me nervous when they enter any new market.
Doesn't Amazon lose money on digital books?? They monopolize(d) the e-book market by lowballing prices, knowing they'll make it up everyewhere else, including sales of Kindles. This established strategy of using it's market power to undercut competitive pricing (fighting against which Apple, et al, have been rewarded by being indicted by the USDOJ) makes me nervous when they enter any new market.
MacOS X is a POSIX certified Unix implementation. Ubuntu is Linux, Linux is similar to Unix, but it isn't Unix.
The undercut their retail, but make up for it by offering the content owner less per sale.