Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Attachments

  • Kindle Fire browse on-the-go.jpg
    Kindle Fire browse on-the-go.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 52
Let me guess, you write this blog yourself right ? Why do you spread misinformation on it ? (no App store ? It does have an appstore, the Amazon appstore).

Why the hate ? Why do some of you feel "threatened" by another choice in the market ? Not everyone needs every feature the iPad has. This is a lower priced device for people who need something simple.
Need to get hits some how.
 
So everybody griping about the iPad only doing 720P has suddenly become moot ?

720P on a 7" tablet is overkill. Heck - it's pretty much overkill on a a 9" and up through 19" But that doesn't stop people from expecting it.

I'd rather have a higher bitrate than resolution. Just like I'd rather have blu-ray vs streaming HD. It's not about image size. It's not JUST about image size. it's more about bitrate...
 
It is absolutely disgusting how much the Apple fanboys are bashing this product when they don't even understand fully what it does, or what it is capable of. Most of the comments I've read are all opinion, with little to no fact associated with it.
The iPad forum of this site won't even allow discussions regarding the Fire and it's relation to future iPads (something they've never done with other competitors). It's odd because it seems this is may be the competitor that Apple fans have been egging on for so long. So now that it's here then why not evaluate/discuss it for what it is rather than find ways to criticize what it's not.

Amazon brought out a STRONG product at an unbelieveable price point. $199 for something that many, MANY people are looking for. Is it a true tablet? Somewhat. Is it as full featured as an iPad? No, but it also doesn't even cost close to as much as a base iPad.
I've both recommended and turned people away friends from buying iPads because the iPad is a costly gadget that doesn't fit everyone's lifestyle or budget. I've also told many friends that the Touchpad isn't what they want even at $100 because price is only a part of what makes an intelligent purchase decision. The people I recommended iPads to love it, but the ones I dissuaded would probably be very happy with a $200 kindle fire because it's not only about apps and hype. Sometimes it's about the ecosystem and for many then Amazon offers exactly what they need.
 
What they should do in the new commercials is show one couple on the couch. The woman using her iPad and the man is sitting next to her, looking bored and sad.

Then, they show another couple. The man and the woman both take Fires out of their back pockets. This couple can now decide what to do with the $100 more they have then the first couple. (I envision thought bubbles with dollar signs coming from their heads)

Then they can show the two Fire owners getting buyer's remorse when they realize they have to pay nearly a hundred bucks a year for Prime (which only makes sense if you're a hardcore Amazon user), they have a small number of apps to download, can't use apps that require an accelerometer, can't take pictures or video, can't Skype, can't surf the web without Wifi, can't do anything that requires more than two fingers for input, can't read it at the beach or in any bright sunlight (a former selling point of the Kindle), can't store more than 8GB worth of media (which sucks I'd you're gonna be out camping or somewhere without Wifi), and can't even turn the volume up or down without using the onscreen controls (which can be touchy on most touchscreen devices).

Oh, and there's no built-in email app. The Playbook was crucified for that. Sure, it cost more than the Fire, but my $30 Sanyo Katana phone has freaking email.
 
Last edited:
The interesting thing is going to be seeing just how much money Amazon will be losing on these things. Either the touchscreen is not as advanced as the one on the iPad (like you see on the cheapest tablets, where you have to press hard to get a response) or they are taking a large loss on each one produced. Can't wait for the iSuppli teardown. And that's just the cost to produce, not counting the development, software, etc. I know there'll be excuses that this is gateway drug to selling stuff from the Amazon storefront, but the margins are already low there. So, from an investor's standpoint, I don't get it, unless they are conceding that the only way to cut into Apple's lead is to undercut on price, and plan to jack it up later.

As a consumer, it's definitely interesting. I like the idea of the server-side rendering of web pages, though it remains to be seen how this works in the wild (with millions of users clogging the servers) rather than under ideal testing conditions. Seems hard to imagine they can just allow unlimited 3G access at full speed - I mean, it's one thing to download books, quite another to watch streaming video. There's got to be SOME throttling, doesn't there? The pixel density is also a little strange - normal text at 160dpi is going to look awfully small. And I'm not sure a 7-inch screen works for much of anything - 9.7" is small for internet viewing.

The fun part is that the two most intriguing parts - a smaller device and server-side webpage rendering - are both things that Apple could probably do without too much effort, so it might serve as a beta test for future devices.

dave

I expect it costs them in the $160 - 180 range to make it.
The rest gets eaten up in marketing and such and they are selling it at cost or loosing a few dollars to start.

Since the tablet is setup to make you purchase Amazon content I think they will make a decent return on the investment unless a huge number of the users root the device. (doubtful)
 
Which brings me to question two.

My family is driving to grandmothers house for Christmas. It's an 8 hour drive.

How do I put 8 hours of 720P video on my shiny new Fire to keep the kids occupied during the drive ?

I can't keep them satiated with candy the whole trip.

Teach them how to read? I would never allow my kids to watch 8 hours of video on anything. Not even my iPad.
 

Yes, it supports Wifi. So just use your iPhone 4's Wifi hotspot or a Mifi device or any other public hotspots. What's your point ?

Ad-hoc does not mean what you think it means I think. ;)

Wi-Fi Connectivity Supports public and private Wi-Fi networks or hotspots that use the 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, or 802.1X standard with support for WEP, WPA and WPA2 security using password authentication; does not support connecting to ad-hoc (or peer-to-peer) Wi-Fi networks.
 
Then they can show the two Fire owners getting buyer's remorse when they realize they have to pay nearly a hundred bucks a year each for Prime, they have a small number of apps to download, can't use apps that require an accelerometer, can't take pictures or video, can't Skype, can't surf the web without Wifi, can't do anything that requires more than two fingers for input, can't read it at the beach or in any bright sunlight (a former selling point of the Kindle), can't store more than 8GB worth of media (which sucks I'd you're gonna be out camping or somewhere without Wifi), and can't even turn the volume up or down without using the onscreen controls (which can be touchy on most touchscreen devices).

How much per year do iPad owners spend on iTunes content? Remember you don't have to buy Prime membership to use the Fire. You can still stream all your Netflix, Hulu, Youtube content through this. You are a typical iFanboy hating on the competition.
 
Then they can show the two Fire owners getting buyer's remorse when they realize they have to pay nearly a hundred bucks a year each for Prime, they have a small number of apps to download, can't use apps that require an accelerometer, can't take pictures or video, can't Skype, can't surf the web without Wifi, can't do anything that requires more than two fingers for input, can't read it at the beach or in any bright sunlight (a former selling point of the Kindle), can't store more than 8GB worth of media (which sucks I'd you're gonna be out camping or somewhere without Wifi), and can't even turn the volume up or down without using the onscreen controls (which can be touchy on most touchscreen devices).

Only it's not 100 bucks for prime each - it's $79. And newsflash - you can have ONE account and share amongst devices. My wife and I don't buy two copies of the same ebook. We buy ONE and we can both read them on our kindles and other devices.

And oh yeah - the 79 is not JUST for content. It also gets you free shipping on most of what Amazon sells physically.
 
So everybody griping about the iPad only doing 720P has suddenly become moot ?

I have no idea about any of that, I was just trying to help.

When I'm dealing with a portable device for video, I generally target decent bitrate balanced against file size. I personally wouldn't want to start with a HD version of any of those movies and have to resample it from 1080p.

Cheers.
 
If they get enough feedback regarding the lack of a camera, I'm sure it'll be included in the Kindle Fire 2. Cameras are dirt cheap..

The Fire is a content consumption product, not a content creation product. Chances are it won't have a camera any more then the low-end Kindle will ever have one.

True, but at least close the gap a little.

Right now there will be a significant number of potential iPad customers seriously looking at the Fire. Hell, they can buy both the Fire and Kindle Touch for under $300. Still $200 less than the cheapest iPad.

The only potential iPad customers that will buy the Fire are (1) customers that only want to consume content; books and movies, and do nothing else of any consequences. (2) customers that don't know the limitations of the Fire and buy these for gifts for relatives who really want what an iPad can do.

"There are two types of companies: those that work hard to charge customers more, and those that work hard to charge customers less. Both approaches can work. We are firmly in the second camp." —Jeff Bezos
Ouch!

This is classic misdirection. This has nothing to do with presenting a limited utility product that is designed to make Amazon money by being a portal into the consumer's home. The Apple product is designed to be a powerful interactive, post PC device. I would be surprised if the Fire even becomes a K-12 useful teaching device.

Buy them all for less than the price of a single iPad.

I know what I am getting family and friends for Christmas now. I never for once thought someone would hit this price point so soon. This is down in if not below impulse buy territory.

Its features more closely match what I do long term with my iPad, but my parents and other relatives would be more than fine with most of these models

Of course, it's under the price of an iPad. It's like being surprised that a crippled and limited netbook is under the price of a MBA.

If you only want to consume content, then buying an iPad is over-buyiing for your needs. If you want to DO anything, then be prepared to be underwhelmed with a Fire.

Make no doubt about it, Amazon WILL rake in the cash with these devices.

Yeah, Amazon will rake in the cash from all the shopping people will do with it. The Fire is like being awarded a store-specific credit card instead of a more useful VISAcard.

You hit the nail on the head. The Fire IS an impulse purchase. Just look at all the people in this discussion that have already pre-ordered it.

If you think the Kindle line-up is well priced now, just wait until all these "impulse" purchases show up on garage sales next spring.

I am getting more and more sure I'll ask for a kindle Fire for my birthday, if it's out in the UK by February anyway, because it does what I want. And at a price that's fantastic. Amazon have done exactly what was needed to get sales.

Yeah, sales of products from the Amazon web site. I love to shop Amazon, but danged if I'll spend $200 for a way to do that when I already have a computer that does other things.

Apple will just launch the iPad 3 with a stupidly high res screen, iOS5 and what I think will be the A6 which is going to be stupidly powerful. Stick in a decent camera, etc etc and it will effectively still own the market at that price point. This is why I don't understand or like them sewing everyone, because they don't need to!

Anyway, Amazon have the low end, Apple the high end, the other manufacturers will have to decide middle ground or take on a giant.

I would personally make a powerful tablet and sell it just under the iPad's starting price, that should sell then. Or stick it in the middle price bracket of the two ends.

If it could be done, then it would have been done already. For what the iPad will do, it is impossible to beat the retail price and meet the specs. Apple makes money because they have bought massive amounts of parts and production capability from their sources.

Now I'm wondering who's going to make money in the long term. The Fire or the iPad?

If the majority of people own a Fire, they will be purchasing Amazon content. Their customer base will be huge and they sell millions of more products than Apple.

Amazon is a great retailer and has a huge customer base. They also do right by the customer and don't have any bad past history to overcome. Amazon has also moved from books to an extensive array of goods. They will do well and the Fire will only help them do so.

At least it'll make Apple sweat a little. :p

I doubt Apple will sweat. Apple has it's own growth plans and they only overlap with Amazon in small ways.

An iPod nano is being sold over $150 for goodness sakes and most netbooks still cost more than an Kindle Fire. All Amazon is trying to do is expand the tablet market's reach that Apple is unable to do with their prohibitive pricing.

Yeah, the iPod line is being squeezed hard by other devices that do more then just play music. Apple has dome well with this now-mature product category.

I do disagree with you when you say "that Apple is unable to do with their prohibitive pricing." Apple would rather add capability to their table line than de-feature it to go after the bottom-end of the table market. Full color 7" touch-tables have been available at Walgreen's for months. They are real crappo, and only serve to show that there is no bottom-end to cheapness and price.

with the economy the way it still is, alot of bargain shoppers this year will be very happy with these new "toys" at reasonable prices. This is the Holiday season for the tablets.

It's more likely that this will be the Holiday season for a lot of disappointed gift receivers that wanted what an iPad can do, but will end up with something much more marginalized.

$199 is a great price for a tablet with integrated services like this. It took Amazon to stand up a credible iPad competitor. I'm getting one. (although why i need one is beyond me )

If you think you are getting something equal to an iPad for half the cost, then I have some gold bars that I need to unload to you for only $100 an ounce.
 
Haven't read through all the comments, so sorry if this has been repeated.


For those eyeing this for a real purchase, I want to inform you of some of the detailed specs behind this device. Don't misunderstand me, I'm not trying to bash the Fire, I just wish to inform those who are expecting a real tablet, because the Fire is not one.


Amazon released this for a stopgate because it wasn't ready to release its "real" tablet. This is essentially a tweaked Blackberry Playbook running android 2.1, with half the memory and storage space. It was built and outsourced to the major ODM Quanta. Amazon's kindle team was busy with next gen kindles so they couldnt design their own tablet in time for the holiday season. So they outsourced it..

This is not a full fledged android tablet, like I said it running 2.1 and thats where it ends. It doesn't have the same functionality as a real android tablet. It's a complete closed garden wall experience, more so than iOS. You browse the web off of a compressed feed from amazon's SC2 servers. You don't connect to the web directly. That may be why browsing is faster, as Amazon's servers are caching the web and streaming it to you, leaving you tablet's hardware free to do whatever..Its running Amazon's custom silk browser. You get your movies and music from Amazon Prime and its video rental and cloud services. It is unknown if you can load content directly, locally (USB storage mode).


For those who know what this is, an e-reader with a few tablet like features (music/web/movies) and you still want to buy it, go ahead. Just know the real version will be out shortly next year.

For those expecting a tablet experience for $200, you're better off trying to find an HP Touchpad, because a full tablet this is not.



For those wanting to test it before you buy..go pick up a blackberry playbook..Because thats what the fire is..cept using an old version of android w/ half the ram.

source 1
source 2
 
Last edited:
Imagine if Blockbuster Video decided to rent their entire movie catalog and TV shows for free for an entire month?

Amazon is doing even better because it will always be available unlike video rental stores or even the public library where they are more limited on what to choose from and the limited number of movies to borrow. And this is FREE for an entire month.

Amazon already giving us a dual-core tablet for $199. They are the world's largest online bookstore. They throw in Amazon Prime. They shrug their shoulders and are like, "Now go watch some Mad Men, Bridesmaids, Japanese softcore porn, or whatever we have for most of December for all we care. Merry Christmas and enjoy!" They are giving us a free sample on renting and buying content from them compared to Netflix and iTunes.

That rocks. Amazon is like the cool parent that lets us use their pool and do whatever the hell we want in their backyard if we want to throw a party. Very generous.
 
Christmas morning

Timmy: opens his present... Wow, Santa brought me an iPad.

Dad: ah, Timmy, that is an Amazon Fire. Pretty cool huh?

Timmy: oh. Give tablet to the dog for a chew toy.

Two year in the future..

Christmas morning.

Timmy: opens his present...Wow, dad got me a MacBook.

Dad: ah, Tim, that is a Acer 6 pound laptop.

Timmy: oh. Dad, I see you still suck.

Timmy: Mom, can we go to the Apple Store today?

Mom: sure. And your dad will not be going with us.

Sigh :rolleyes:
 
I pre-ordered the Kindle touch wifi edition. I figure for 99 bucks its a no brainer to slightly smaller keyboard-less kindle that has an improved e-ink technology.
 
I love my iPad 2, especially its size as I read comics on it, but this Kindle Fire is awesome for 200 bucks.

Here's hoping the aggressive pricing causes Apple to lower the price on future iPads (though I doubt it as I think a retina display for the iPad is going to cost a pretty penny to produce).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.