Failure? What failure?As I said above, the main reasons for Kindle's failure are as follows:
Have you ever held an eBook reader and tried to read on it? My spidey-senses tell me you haven't.- price, ridiculously high for a monochromatic display that serves only as a (bad) reader;
Jobs of all people is quite ignorant for that quote of his. Does he not know that Mac's control a 4% marketshare yet is immensely profitable and that the Kindle sold comparable to what the iPod did in it's first year? 40% of people may read less than 1 book a month, but that means the majority i.e. 60%, reads at least 1 book a month.- people don't "shuffle" books as they do with music or movies; at most, they try to read 2 books at the same time. Whoever does differently is an exception - in fact, Jobs is absolutely right when he says that people read few books nowadays, mainly due to the information overload they face everyday;
The original iPod, which had a black & white screen, cost $399. I don't see your point. It's not exactly fair to write off an entire industry just because your to close-minded to see the potential in such a device.- again: $350 for a grey-shade reader? No go.
What? When's the last time you opened a book not intended for a 6 year old? Most books are in simple black & white.- sorry, a grey-shade display doesn't do it for me and many more; books are published in a plethora of different paper types and colors, a versatility that does not exist with the bag of hurt called Kindle.
People said the EXACT same thing when Apple introduced the iPod, and we know how that ended...I like Amazon and order a lot of PAPER books from them...they should just stick to their core business.
Again, I'm definitely part of that 40% Jobs was talking about, but that doesn't mean I don't see the potential in such device. Steve, supposedly a "visionary" obviously didn't.