It''s also good to remember that the Kaby Lake equivalents won't come out until early next year...Remember people, the processors came out in Q3/4 2015.
It''s also good to remember that the Kaby Lake equivalents won't come out until early next year...Remember people, the processors came out in Q3/4 2015.
That is part of the reason but also because they have been with AMD for a few years now so have deals in place.I feel like they went for AMD because of cost (more profits), not performance.
Well they wouldn't be able to because of the TDP of them, but the 1050 would be most realistic. I think the 460 is a decent upgrade and now it is easier than ever to plug in an eGPU.And 1060 and 1070 and 1080. I think gone are the days of Apple including an actually decent dGPU in their computers.
The 460 is like the bottom of the rung in those line of GPUs ... there is the 470, 480, and soon to come 490. Apple yet again is crapping on everyone for profit. These GPUs aren't even expensive either. I literally do not understand their logic. They keep talking about driving 5k content and displays and offer completely under-powered dGPUs. It boggles the mind.
Good luck burning your battery with a 120W monster radiator in your 15mm thin computer then.I'm sorry but this is truly pathetic. They only offer up to the 460 in even the top end MacBook Pro. Where's the 470 or even 480? You can spend nearly 5 grand after tax on the maxed out MacBook Pro and you're getting an AMD 460 and 16 GB of DDR3 RAM. Please tell me how Apple is not trying to rob everyone blind? Prices haven't been this absurd in a very long time.
What if his replacement is even worse?On October 27, 2016, Mac died
RIP Mac!
PS: F U Tim Cook! Everything you touch turns to crap! Just retire already!
With the same frequency DDR3 offers lower latency than DDR4.They should have used DDR4 for such a high end laptop, crazy they used DDR3.
You have no idea what you're talking about.Good luck burning your battery with 120W monster radiator in your 15mm thin computer than. Oh, farewell heat pipes......
Remember, this is the Pro series not the RX series. There is no 470, 480, or 490.I'm sorry but this is truly pathetic. They only offer up to the 460 in even the top end MacBook Pro. Where's the 470 or even 480? You can spend nearly 5 grand after tax on the maxed out MacBook Pro and you're getting an AMD 460 and 16 GB of DDR3 RAM. Please tell me how Apple is not trying to rob everyone blind? Prices haven't been this absurd in a very long time.
Yes, I know ... but the TF performance clearly shows these are on the low end ... again. Also their highest end laptop costs 5 grand after tax. These SHOULD be as powerful if not more than the iMacs. Dunno where you got that mindset from. It's irrelevant if it's a laptop or a desktop ... for the price you should be getting desktop class performance. Please stop making excuses for Apple.Remember, this is the Pro series not the RX series. There is no 470, 480, or 490.
But Apple usually put lower end GPUs in the MacBook Pro.
Since they use mobile cards in their iMacs, they have to reserve the higher end chips for the iMacs otherwise you would end up with flagship notebooks that are as or more powerful than their flagship desktop. That's not usually something that they like.
What if his replacement is even worse?
Although he wouldn't want to do it, we need Woz to run Apple. He would know how to meet the needs of professional customers and he has a unique passion for the Mac.
Ok. Go ahead and squeeze the aforementioned RX 480 into this thing. Let's see if you are better than Apple engineers.You have no idea what you're talking about.
Didn't say stick an RX 480 in there ... but the flops performance shows these are again low end GPUs compared to literally every other laptop in existence at this price range. I'm not sure what you're defending exactly. And you're not complimenting Apple engineers with your statement. Putting a low end GPU in a 2500 dollar laptop is not a magical feat of engineering. It's penny pinching. Don't call it something it isn't.Ok. Go ahead and squeeze the aforementioned RX 480 into this thing. Let's see if you are better than Apple engineers.
See a penny, pick it up, and all day long you'll have mediocre video performance.
Some Macs can if you supply the right GPU and run WindowsLol - no
No Mac does.
You mentioned RX 480 in your post thoughDidn't say stick an RX 480 in there ... but the flops performance shows these are again low end GPUs compared to literally every other laptop in existence at this price range. I'm not sure what you're defending exactly. And you're not complimenting Apple engineers with your statement. Putting a low end GPU in a 2500 dollar laptop is not a magical feat of engineering. It's penny pinching. Don't call it something it isn't.
It''s also good to remember that the Kaby Lake equivalents won't come out until early next year...