why? historically, in the USA the unlocked model sells for the same price as a full-priced carrier locked model (which is cheaper than any in Europe)... so of course no one would pay $968 for a 32gb iPhone 5 unlocked... they can pay $749+taxwow looking at the poll results I think I know why apple don't offer it unlocked in the states lol
wow looking at the poll results I think I know why apple don't offer it unlocked in the states lol
Totally understand where u are coming from. In my younger days I would have thought the same way.
Once (and hopefully have a good financial job as u get older). Paying cash up front is usually the best way to go. Especially for declining assets like cars and some high value electronics/furniture which I used to finance myself.
The 2 LTE phones I have used are. The Razr Maxx and iPhone 5.it was a popular theory that was floated around when the verizon iphone 5 was first discovered to be unlocked, but it's been debunked. if it were true, all verizon lte phones would be unlocked, but they aren't.
if you're determined to use AT&T prepaid:So if I were to get an unlocked phone in the US, say GSM, and I want to use AT&T for the service provider, what kind of plan can I get?
There's no cost advantage to buying an unlocked and contract free iPhone in the USA. As it's already been stated it can work out cheaper in the UK & Europe to pay full price for the phone and use it with a cheap monthly SIM only plan.
In the USA you pay the same monthly payment even if you use your own phone so it makes sense to take advantage of the subsidised handset.
if you're determined to use AT&T prepaid:
http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/plans/prepaidplans.html
$64 for unlimited calls/texts + 1GB data
(the unlimited data of the $50 plan doesn't apply to smartphones)
but if you are planning on a postpaid plan like most folks in the USA and can bear with a 2 year contract like most of us, just get a subsidized iphone... as others have stated, you're gonna need service anyways. I don't see the appeal in constant carrier switching -- I personally hate changing numbers (or dealing with porting numbers). complaints about being "stuck" in a 2-year contract are overrated.
perhaps unlocked phones & carrier switching is popular in Europe cuz other countries are literally next door, so it makes sense to use "local" carriers to save costs or get better service, but that's not as huge of an issue in the USA (free nationwide roaming)
totally depends on your usage. see my post+link above.so your saying if you buy unlocked in the us, and top up when needed, and say only use the phone sparingly, and over 2 years spend about $60, this would be the similar price as to the $299 on contract over 2 years?
i suppose the other advantage is not being bound to a contract
if you're open to it, the eventual jailbreak should allow any wifi-only applications to work over cellular dataBut I assume going with that type of plan it would not be eligible for FaceTime over cellular like my current plan right?
wow looking at the poll results I think I know why apple don't offer it unlocked in the states lol
that debunking is a fail and isn't really serious and compliance would not means all would be (verizon is famous as the provider demand the most capability lock outs). What the article doesn't go into is that Apple may not have been able to only lock the bands in quesiton without charging verizon an added fee or creating possible other problems.it was a popular theory that was floated around when the verizon iphone 5 was first discovered to be unlocked, but it's been debunked. if it were true, all verizon lte phones would be unlocked, but they aren't.
An extra 16gb of flash memory for $100 is pretty greedy on Apples part. I couldn't ever buy anything more than a 16gb iPhone on principle because I don't want to encourage that behavior by Apple.
So to the people who say $1k USD is too much, do you all realize that the 64gb iPhone 5 is $920 after tax in the US? Unsubsidized?