"Burn him! Burn the witch!" (apologies to Monty Python.)
Me for being a realist or Schiller for being a downer?
"Burn him! Burn the witch!" (apologies to Monty Python.)
Me for being a realist or Schiller for being a downer?![]()
Innovating like how? Cramming a powerful computer into a tiny frame, creating the first useable touch screen phone, developing software that can utilise multi cores and GPU's in every day purposes, developing an app store model that has sold god knows how many millions of apps in less than 6 months. Creating the first financially viable way of making unibody computers. There expenditure on R&D, and the amount of patents they file speaks more than words.I don't know. A machine with dual touch screens instead of a physical keyboard would be interesting. It's time for Apple to get back to innovating instead of just trying to stuff things into smaller and smaller packages.
Would you rather have iPhone for an hour and a half?And then talk about Snow Leopard for an hour and a half. It'll be WWDC 2007 all over again.
Would you rather have iPhone for an hour and a half?![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCFan
Oh and nearly all netbooks have an optical drive.
Name me one that does.
I don't know. A machine with dual touch screens instead of a physical keyboard would be interesting. It's time for Apple to get back to innovating instead of just trying to stuff things into smaller and smaller packages.
you mean like this? the Canova that is supposed to be in manufacturing for 2010 delivery?
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.pclaunches.com/notebooks/canova_dual_touch_screen_laptop.php
That is cool.
Does form follow function, or are you just reacting to its strange form factor?
I think its the most functional and adaptive design I've ever seen. With the second screen and the accelerometer, it reconfigures itself to be optimal to the current use. The design can also be scaled up or scaled down.
I think its the most functional and adaptive design I've ever seen. With the second screen and the accelerometer, it reconfigures itself to be optimal to the current use. The design can also be scaled up or scaled down.
I'm skeptical. Have you actually used or seen one in real life? Unless this double-touchscreen interface is extremely well implemented, it could be little more than a gimmick, more infuriating than functional. We also have to know that it would be quite expensive to produce, and would chomp batteries.
I've seen something similar but a little smaller and with a single screen from this tech company out of the San Francisco Bay area called Apple.
I would not call the iPhone even remotely similar, if only because (as we should know) "the interface is King." You don't just slap together a couple of touchscreen displays, make it look cool and call it done. Making these concepts work takes sweating a lot of details. This is something Apple is exceptionally good at. Them and who else?
I don't think Apple would slap a couple of touch screens together and call it a day. The Canova machine was used to get a rough idea of what a theoretical dual touchscreen Apple netbook would look like.
No, Apple wouldn't -- but I'm hearing people say that the Canova design is something great simply on the basis of the way it looks. I care more about how it functions.
Make a 9-10" Macbook Air <$999 and drop the white MB.
And they may just do that once they sell off inventory of the white MacBooks.
I really don't think that's going to happen. We aren't getting netbooks for a while because Apple ignores it's core users now