Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
a television doesn't make sense. For one thing it'll be too expensive. I say focus on making the apple tv a better product.
 
I bought a second apple TV for my bedroom, instead of buying a new TV, or a blu ray player, or another gizmo etc... so I could watch MLBTV and netflix, and have the ability to download movies occasionally.

I would happily pay for a new apple TV again this year and take the old one and hjook it up to one fo the other 3 televisions my house, if the features and upgrades were worth it to me.

Airplay is amazing.

I'll spend another 700 bucks on a new Ipad in another year or two, and will buy a new Iphone every two years.

I won't spend more than $1500 on a 55 inch television, and I won't even buy one until mine breaks. People buy televisions every 5 to 10 years. Apple isn't getting into the TV business.

Unless they plan on re-inventing the television, the way they did the radio, stereo, record player, telephone, dvd player, vcr, computer, newspaper, magazine and book.
 
not that I don't want an Apple brand TV, but it's really hard to see how that's going to happen.
 
Not a terrible idea

If I could ditch the PS3, Airport Extreme, ATV2 and get games, movies, tv channels, etc, as well as wireless capabilities and a 1080P picture, I'd be interested.

Apple would likely work through the thing from the inside out to make it aesthetically pleasing, thin as hell and offer only one plug (instead of the rats nest most entertainment centers hold) and your iphone / ipad would be the remote. Oh, don't forget that setup would be a breeze and with Facetime built in, they would draw in the telephony market too.

No more clutter and full apple integration. What's not to like?
 
I would hate this. TV technology is very taste specific, and Apple would have to get behind a single one. I like plasma, you may like LCD. Edge lit, back lit, 3D or no 3D? 3 color or 4 color elements?

I think Apple TV is the right way to go. A simple box that converts any TV of your choice into whatever TV experience Apple has in mind.
 
Great. A 4K magical TV.

Actually...

http://themacswitch.net/2011/03/25/will-people-start-lining-up-for-macs/



iPad_line.jpg
 
It would sport of course Airplay and Retinal on a 60" model in other words 4K TV for the masses. :p

This.

Think long and hard about whatever complaint/excuse people have about TVs. Think about whatever technical explanation is required for use.
Think about how to get rid of it.

Resolution, framerate, bit rate, and color depth so high the actual figures are irrelevant.
Wiring irrelevant (save only power). Either wireless, or "anything goes".
Effortless 3D (glasses-less, lenticular, and/or head tracking).
Minimal, intuitive interface (barely-there remote, or iPad like).

Not saying it would be all or any of these.
Saying it will be a "why didn't we think of, or do, that" obvious step.

And just insufficient enough to keep the haters happy.
 
An apple branded tv? Perfect area for apples MO. Tvs are yearly updated, usually an incremental upgrade, good ones cost a arm and a leg, always using great adjectives to make a product standout.

Yep sound like apple would fit riiiiiight in :D
 
Hmm, the same Gene Munster who:

-- predicted 4.3M iPads sold in 2010 (he actually lowered his estimate and ~15M were sold).

-- predicted "lines will be small" for iPad2 (by his own later admission, they were longer than for the original iPad).

-- predicted Apple would sell half a million iPhone 3GS during launch weekend (they sold double that).

-- predicted Apple would not launch a new iPhone at the 2009 WWDC (they did).

-- predicted in 2005 "Apple is prepping Macs to serve as a hub for digital media for consumers by incorporating Tivo-like DVR capabilities"

-- Has missed numerous financial estimates by large margins.

To be fair, Munster is better than most "professional" analysts, he does a bit more research and has a decent track record on certain details. But I'm just saying, don't put much "stock" into this.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8G4)

Anytime an "analyst" opens their mouth, it should be page 2 material at best.

lol i agree, that term got the same value as a "source" on some gossip site
 
What? Apple moving into TV?

Quick, go back to Fall, 2001 and dredge up all the "Apple will fail in the music player sector" posts!
 
What will Apple offer that other manufactures can't?

A robust and thriving App Store.

The App Store will legitimize the Apple TV set.

I would go so far as to suggest the reason we don't have an App Store on the current Apple TV is because Apple is saving it as the compelling reason to buy an entire TV set.

Apple doesn't have to provide the reasons to buy the Apple TV set. Developers will do that for them. In the hundreds of thousands.

Pretty soon you won't be switching channels. You'll be switching apps.

My 2 cents.
 
Nice idea and interesting. best bet would be a collaboration with Panasonic. After all since Pioneer stopped production of the best flast screen TVs ever and Panasonic employing those engineers who got laid of from Pioneer, their new 2011 panels are simply the best platform for it. if they put it into a Samsung or alike then no thanks. panny s are reasonably priced.
 
Top Ten Apple Branded TV features.

10. Requires iTunes $500 remote.
9. Costs twice as much and has half as many channels as other TVs.
8. Can't watch BD movies on it.
7. No pRon.
6. Requires 7 Apple adapters to access all features.
5. TV bezel constantly runs iAds.
4. Not able to display politically incorrect programming.
3. Al Gore circuit turns off TV after 200 watts are consumed.
2. Comes in only one size.
1. WOOOOO!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUh6LDz177k
 
wohoo!

I would be greatly interested in this. Likely would not buy the first generation. It would aso depend on size and actual features. Ive been greatly disappointed in the revamp of the apple tv and am looking for apple to do more for my living room than this past pathetic attempt at ATV2.

This keeps up, just a matter of time before Rupert or one of the Merdock's gets a seat on the board of Apple. One more nail in the coffin of the Starnoff model of television distribution.
 
Munster goes along with this huh? well, that's enough for me to discredit it. I wouldn't mind having his job. The qualifications are apparently nil.
 
Apple would be better off having other companies such as Samsung that already put wi-fi receivers in there TVs buy Apple TV licenses.
 
It will probably cost twice the price of the equivalent LG/Samsung and at first will only offer half the features.:rolleyes:
 
top ten apple branded tv features.

10. Requires itunes $500 remote.
9. Costs twice as much and has half as many channels as other tvs.
8. Can't watch bd movies on it.
7. No pron.
6. Requires 7 apple adapters to access all features.
5. Tv bezel constantly runs iads.
4. Not able to display politically incorrect programming.
3. Al gore circuit turns off tv after 200 watts are consumed.
2. Comes in only one size.
1. Wooooo!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juh6ldz177k


+1 - #3 lmfao
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.