I think Apple will continue to offer 2 new phones, high-end and mid-rang, like we saw this year with iPhone 5s and 5c.
Multiple refreshes per year? Are they serious? As it is now, it takes so much effort and taxes the heck out of their supply chain to meet iPhone demand when it's announced... I can't imagine them pulling themselves up by the bootstraps and being able to meet that much demand/volume.
On the positive side though, I hope I can finally get an iPhone (or iPad) with the hardware that 2013 commands. I still can't believe they're selling a 16gb iphone... I understand they make a ton of margins but this makes them seem stubborn/stuck to adapt to changing consumer/technology preferences.
/rant.
Does that mean older iPhone will get obsolete faster than ever before? Meaning people need buy iPhone more frequently? Good luck with that Apple fans...
Does that mean older iPhone will get obsolete faster than ever before? Meaning people need buy iPhone more frequently? Good luck with that Apple fans...
The telcos - verizon, att, sprint, tmobile - all just created plan that cost more to allow us to upgrade phones yearly in the US. This can only mean even more expensive plans from the telco to allow us to upgrade every three months
More seriously, I do think this is a good move (because it allows them to better compete against all the weekly samsung releases) but maybe people will move the the european model of simply buying their phones out right (not so good for apple).
iOS products can be upgraded in capacity for interim upgrades. Personally I have no use for a new iPhone until there is a 128 GB option. Capacity increases have really been lagging since the transition to solid state media.
Then I would have no incentive to upgrade my phone every year
Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty
Apple's bifurcation...
It happened before, when Steve Jobs was ousted. It was the main reason Apple went almost bankrupt. It took the very same Steve Jobs to resurrect it by means of cutting off resource hogs and focus on 4 products. Streamlining the resources - and I mean ALL the resources is the only way for this company to survive.
Do not put your money where the patent fight is, put your money where your focus on future devices is.
iOS products can be upgraded in capacity for interim upgrades. Personally I have no use for a new iPhone until there is a 128 GB option. Capacity increases have really been lagging since the transition to solid state media.
iPhone 5S still shipping in 2 to 3 weeks.
iPad mini - may not enough stock for Holiday period (thanksgiving to Christmas)
They should go back to - march iPad cycle and June/july iPhone cycle.
to be fair, they're not forcing you to buy the low end model
If this is true, then Apple is slowly making the EXACT mistakes that Sony made in the late 90s.
Sony spread itself thin by constantly expanding, refreshing, and confusing consumers...all because they stopped staying true to their niche in the tech field. Apple's niche (according to Tim Cook himself) is a few great products, with solid refreshes and simply consumer lines.
Just ask Sony what they would do differently with their "Walkman" lineup and then their failed jump into the mobile arena.
I know, right. Bring back HDD based iphones or Apple is bust.
I never understood the way people appear insulted by the existence of a 16gb device in the line up. Some people seem to become almost obsessed with how all their apps and music could not fit on a 16gb device. Would they be less insulted if Apple simply axed the 16gb model and changed nothing?
iOS products can be upgraded in capacity for interim upgrades. Personally I have no use for a new iPhone until there is a 128 GB option. Capacity increases have really been lagging since the transition to solid state media.
Apple makes most of they dough on memory upgrades since they charge a full $100 for every increment. So you want 128GB - it extra $300.00 - Apple memory cost is about $45 more!