Mod Note: This thread was closed to clean up off-topic football talk. If you wish to discuss that, please start your own thread, or use one of the existing threads on that topic. Thank you for your consideration.
Last edited:
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Android has gained significant market share in key markets.
- Thread starter apolloa
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well seeing as it seems more and more likely Apple is going to skip a year with it's iPhone, it will need all the 'persuasion' it can get to make a decent phone in 2017 although I think it's share price will be half or a third of what it is now by then.
Android is certainly where it's currently at.
Last edited by a moderator:
I just don't get the appeal of that phone the screen is kinda neat but the overall package is just so meh
At least Samsung with the S7 didn't have as bad a quarter as Apple did.S7 is selling like hotcakes while the iPhone with its dated design doesn't come close
You're right, Apple only made 40b last quarter.
And is still the most valuable company in the world. How bad could it be?
Last edited:
Well it would seem like its selling like hotcakes when they had 2 massive sales flops with the S5 and S6.
You're right, Apple only made 40b last quarter.
Google Again Surpasses Apple as Most Valuable Company in the World
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/05/12/google-most-valuable-company-market-cap/
Does this explain away any of Google's shortcomings with Android?
Just correcting you.
Regardless of first or second, does this explain away any of Google's shortcomings with Android?
EDIT: Nothing, @I7guy? No answer? Again, just looking to get some clarity on your position, especially as an Apple fan.
Last edited:
Between all of the witty repartee you know my position, I've stated it and it hasn't changed.
You're right, Apple only made 40b last quarter.
Again you bring in $$ when the thread and stat is about marketshare.
If you've answered it, I missed it. Not going to dig through your post history, so if you can, please clarify here?
Does Google's current number 1 position as most valuable company in the world excuse them of any of Android's shortcomings?
EDIT: @I7guy Another thing: there has been no witty remarks from me to you in these recent exchanges. If anything, the quote I responded to of yours had the witty remark:
You wrote...
You're right, Apple only made 40b last quarter.
And I responded with a simple correction, and then asked you the question. So, no witty remarks. No sarcasm. No name calling. Nothing.
Just a question.
Given that, will you answer?
Last edited:
I suggest you change your tune, their is a plan to float an oil company across three stock markets in different country's which will value it at 2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS.
It will flatten any willy waving argument about which electronics company is the most valuable company in the world in one fell swoop...
@I7guy no answer still?
So mum all of a sudden.
Logically speaking, what is true for Apple should be true for Google. Right?
Just like what was true for Samsung and the note 5 s pen "bad design" must be true for Apple and the magic mouse design too right?
You were awfully mum about that too when asked about the discrepancy there.
Strange. Well if you won't clarify your position, there are only so many conclusions one can draw.
So mum all of a sudden.
Logically speaking, what is true for Apple should be true for Google. Right?
Just like what was true for Samsung and the note 5 s pen "bad design" must be true for Apple and the magic mouse design too right?
You were awfully mum about that too when asked about the discrepancy there.
Strange. Well if you won't clarify your position, there are only so many conclusions one can draw.
It must affect you in some way for you to me emotionally attached to the argument. I would assume that Apple and Google will exchange positions many times over the course of this year and into the future. Both companies are hugely successful and deserve credit for their respective business models and achievements.
In response to the bold, yup, no doubt about it.
The point is no matter who is at the top, we can discuss and compare their respective technologies independent of sales and profits and market share and other such financial metrics. In fact, we must.
Because if sales and profits is all some people wanna go by, then by that logic, Google currently must have the best smartphones. And any shortcomings they have that people want to discuss must conflict with the millions of Android users that are happy with Android as evidenced by the #1 value position and market share.
One can easily see how silly such an argument is.
Everyone except, i7guy, I guess? He won't answer the question, so who knows.
Isnt this about market share and what market share means? But hey you asked about the mouse and maybe Apple could have done better but the design is not flawed unless you consider the connector aspect of it all and breaking the connector off if your an abject klutz.
There is just no need to keep rehashing the mouse or the spen. It's not a conversation for this particular thread.
Just using it as an example of another odd discrepancy in your arguments.
But you know what, you're right. It has little to do with market share. Whereas you brought up Apple's 40 billion dollar last quarter (and in a sarcastic way) and how they're the most valuable company in the world. Turns out they're not, which led to my question.
So, will you answer it? You're clearly reading this thread. Should Google being number 1 currently in value and marketshare be used as some kind of defense for any of Android's shortcomings? I ask because it seems that's what you do when Apple is at the top; something along the lines of how millions of users are buying Apple iPhones just fine so Apple doesn't need to compete harder or anything. Etc. Going by that, it seems reasonable you'd feel the same way about Google and Android given the metrics shown to you here. Right?
I mean, if you won't answer the question, we can only draw so many conclusions given the precedence of your arguments. Or is this argument of yours somehow only applicable to Apple?
If only you'd explain... =/
Last edited:
Android has had a much larger overall market share compared to Apple for many years.
Why is this information special in any way? There are more PC's sold than Macs as well.
Why is this information special in any way? There are more PC's sold than Macs as well.