Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Palantir commenting on it confirms this was actively used by state actors or their contractors (aka Palantir) and they’ve since moved on to a new exploit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
Coming soon to iOS in EU, courtesy open up everything.
IOS would somehow have to grant the app privileges that allow dangerous exploits. The issue in the present case is that the app was preinstalled with system privileges as part of the OS install by Google.

The correct analogy would be that a first-party built-in Apple app would have a vulnerability and also system-level privileges.
 
And yet Android users come into the iPhone forums to tell us how superior their platform is. :oops:
Coming soon to iOS in EU, courtesy open up everything.
But Android is open and good! /s
No software is 100% secure. Stop pretending like iOS doesn't have its share of flaws



 
The sheer amount of garbage running in the background of Android and even iOS to some extent is staggering.

Look at a process list of either one and you'd be able to disable half of that crap and still have a phone that functions normally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sikh and gusmula
It will be, when Apple has to expose same internals. Crowdstrike messed up and Microsoft said those apis shouldn’t have been exposed to crowdstrike if not for EU mandate.
And EU forcing vendors to open up same level of access to OS for third parties. Crowd strike cough cough.
Opening up same level of access to iOS like Apple has done for decades with macOS. Look at all those vulnerabilities macOS users (like yourself!) have been exposed to. It's terrible.
 
It will be, when Apple has to expose same internals. Crowdstrike messed up and Microsoft said those apis shouldn’t have been exposed to crowdstrike if not for EU mandate.
That’s a misrepresentation, Microsoft is arguing in bad faith here: https://www.it-daily.net/en/it-secu...using-the-crowdstrike-outage-to-its-advantage


TL;DR: Nothing required Microsoft to expose unsafe interfaces.
 
The sheer amount of garbage running in the background of Android and even iOS to some extent is staggering.

Look at a process list of either one and you'd be able to disable half of that crap and still have a phone that functions normally.
The number of interaction points (many are critical as well) in a mobile is much more than in a PC or Laptop where you would carry your device anywhere, touch anywhere, click anywhere, take picture, unlock with Face ID or finger, receive calls, make calls, connect to WiFi while connect with 5G, update GPS location, play music, send message, connect to your car, connect to watch, connect to ear buds, stream videos, ask apps to process information etc…the interrupt points are too many that requires background processes. Mobile OS and the tech is really complicated unlike laptop.Those days even desktop machines used to crash if you overload them even with few more additional devices to your desktop or laptop/
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: ArtOfWarfare
Firewall, y'all.

I'm still salty at Google and Apple for not having a built in firewall on an OS that's connected 100% of the time.
You piqued my curiosity with that comment, so I had to go look up some info. Apparently, both mobile OSes do indeed have a system-level firewall that protects the device from unexpected external probes -- they just don't necessarily make their respective firewalls available to the end user for any kind of reconfiguration purposes, other than On/Off.

Additionally, it's worth noting that both iOS and Android are *nix like operating systems... but they have been essentially stripped of the vast majority of the typical communication suite that you would expect to find on a desktop computer running such OSes. So if you actually want something like telnet, a shell or a web server, you have to go install it yourself. The premise is that the lack of those default open ports is presumed to reduce the attack surface of mobile devices.
 
Ever notice how the Android fanboys reveal themselves when an article like this appears? They have a myriad of Android tech blogs to choose from but they pop up here all the time. Why is that?
I've got an Android phone and I don't go to those forums. So I can only assume that they think MR is more fun, or that lots of people are insecure and feel the need to defend their device purchasing decisions here. But yes, it is weird.
 
Amazing how people here happily attacks android when IOS probably has multiple zero days exploits being sold on black markets as we speak.

Just some months ago a security company was gladly advertising the fact that their software can spy people on even the latest IOS versions, the article was posted here on macrumors, I’m too lazy too look it up again.

Absolutely no company is completely “safe” but android has the advantage that being open anyone can audit the source code if they’re willing, only apple knows how many exploits are left unpatched on IOS because there’s just no good way to fix them, security by obscurity is an absurd.
 
Ever notice how the Android fanboys reveal themselves when an article like this appears? They have a myriad of Android tech blogs to choose from but they pop up here all the time. Why is that?
Have you ever considered that a lot of people here are not just “apple fans” but fans of technology in general with plenty of devices from multiple brands? Are you trying to gatekeep the forums so only people with positive attitude towards apple and negative towards android can post? I guess the obvious solution is that people should stay on their echo chambers and never read different opinions.
 
Last edited:
So, there's some bad practices at work here (retaining unused applications, http transactions) but this seems to be another potential vulnerability that only manifests at the end of a long chain of "it's possible"s.

I'm all for ridiculing bad security practices, but this seems to be a minor vulnerability in the grand scheme. The WaPo article suggests it requires physical access and a password to activate, and includes a mere hypothetical suggestion that a skilled hacker might activate it remotely.

Unless the iVerify report shows something more substantial, I'd just suggest people don't put their phones into store demo mode until the patch arrives.
But it's still a deep hole into the system. Lots of people are just not paying attention. The app should scream out every time it starts, at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
Have you ever considered that a lot of people here are not just “apple fans” but fans of technology in general with plenty of devices from multiple brands? Are you trying to gatekeep the forums so only people with positive attitude towards apple and negative towards android can post? I guess the obvious solution is that people should stay on their echo chambers and never read different opinions.
No, but wading through a sea of argumentative posts from Samsung evangelists and Android fans on many threads does get a little tiring sometimes.

No, I don’t think Apple is perfect, yes I prefer them to Google.
Yes, I’ve tried Android, no I don’t like it.

I’m not going to switch because some people come to a Mac forum and complain about how Apple is really bad, their competition are really the better choices, with ever increasing vitriol.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.