Google will fix it on their phones but not on other Android phones.They unlike apple at least acknowledged it quickly once notified and advised of a plan to rectify it
Google will fix it on their phones but not on other Android phones.They unlike apple at least acknowledged it quickly once notified and advised of a plan to rectify it
IOS would somehow have to grant the app privileges that allow dangerous exploits. The issue in the present case is that the app was preinstalled with system privileges as part of the OS install by Google.Coming soon to iOS in EU, courtesy open up everything.
And yet Android users come into the iPhone forums to tell us how superior their platform is.![]()
Coming soon to iOS in EU, courtesy open up everything.
No software is 100% secure. Stop pretending like iOS doesn't have its share of flawsBut Android is open and good! /s
They obviously are, but they’re still wrong.Presumably they’re referencing side loading unregulated App Stores and the push for Apple to loosen up on its tightly controlled access to the OS.
It will be, when Apple has to expose same internals. Crowdstrike messed up and Microsoft said those apis shouldn’t have been exposed to crowdstrike if not for EU mandate.
Opening up same level of access to iOS like Apple has done for decades with macOS. Look at all those vulnerabilities macOS users (like yourself!) have been exposed to. It's terrible.And EU forcing vendors to open up same level of access to OS for third parties. Crowd strike cough cough.
Likely this was a hackable route for many many many many years.
Just goes to show — just because Google & Apple say their phones are secure — doesn’t mean they are. It just means that they aren’t aware of an existing vulnerability
Small edit above.[…]
Just goes to show — just because Google […]
That’s a misrepresentation, Microsoft is arguing in bad faith here: https://www.it-daily.net/en/it-secu...using-the-crowdstrike-outage-to-its-advantageIt will be, when Apple has to expose same internals. Crowdstrike messed up and Microsoft said those apis shouldn’t have been exposed to crowdstrike if not for EU mandate.
The number of interaction points (many are critical as well) in a mobile is much more than in a PC or Laptop where you would carry your device anywhere, touch anywhere, click anywhere, take picture, unlock with Face ID or finger, receive calls, make calls, connect to WiFi while connect with 5G, update GPS location, play music, send message, connect to your car, connect to watch, connect to ear buds, stream videos, ask apps to process information etc…the interrupt points are too many that requires background processes. Mobile OS and the tech is really complicated unlike laptop.Those days even desktop machines used to crash if you overload them even with few more additional devices to your desktop or laptop/The sheer amount of garbage running in the background of Android and even iOS to some extent is staggering.
Look at a process list of either one and you'd be able to disable half of that crap and still have a phone that functions normally.
Terrible analogy.Opening up same level of access to iOS like Apple has done for decades with macOS. Look at all those vulnerabilities macOS users (like yourself!) have been exposed to. It's terrible.
They are referring to fact that users in the EU can side load. Heavy handed EU isn't helping anyone. The only positive to anything they have done is USB-C.It has got nothing to do with the EU or it’s DMA.
People can enjoy more than one thing.Ever notice how the Android fanboys reveal themselves when an article like this appears? They have a myriad of Android tech blogs to choose from but they pop up here all the time. Why is that?
You piqued my curiosity with that comment, so I had to go look up some info. Apparently, both mobile OSes do indeed have a system-level firewall that protects the device from unexpected external probes -- they just don't necessarily make their respective firewalls available to the end user for any kind of reconfiguration purposes, other than On/Off.Firewall, y'all.
I'm still salty at Google and Apple for not having a built in firewall on an OS that's connected 100% of the time.
I've got an Android phone and I don't go to those forums. So I can only assume that they think MR is more fun, or that lots of people are insecure and feel the need to defend their device purchasing decisions here. But yes, it is weird.Ever notice how the Android fanboys reveal themselves when an article like this appears? They have a myriad of Android tech blogs to choose from but they pop up here all the time. Why is that?
Have you ever considered that a lot of people here are not just “apple fans” but fans of technology in general with plenty of devices from multiple brands? Are you trying to gatekeep the forums so only people with positive attitude towards apple and negative towards android can post? I guess the obvious solution is that people should stay on their echo chambers and never read different opinions.Ever notice how the Android fanboys reveal themselves when an article like this appears? They have a myriad of Android tech blogs to choose from but they pop up here all the time. Why is that?
But it's still a deep hole into the system. Lots of people are just not paying attention. The app should scream out every time it starts, at least.So, there's some bad practices at work here (retaining unused applications, http transactions) but this seems to be another potential vulnerability that only manifests at the end of a long chain of "it's possible"s.
I'm all for ridiculing bad security practices, but this seems to be a minor vulnerability in the grand scheme. The WaPo article suggests it requires physical access and a password to activate, and includes a mere hypothetical suggestion that a skilled hacker might activate it remotely.
Unless the iVerify report shows something more substantial, I'd just suggest people don't put their phones into store demo mode until the patch arrives.
No, but wading through a sea of argumentative posts from Samsung evangelists and Android fans on many threads does get a little tiring sometimes.Have you ever considered that a lot of people here are not just “apple fans” but fans of technology in general with plenty of devices from multiple brands? Are you trying to gatekeep the forums so only people with positive attitude towards apple and negative towards android can post? I guess the obvious solution is that people should stay on their echo chambers and never read different opinions.