Open Source wins here.
If now only the producers would get their act together with updating their Android Versions on their smartphones. I have to say I like Mac OS, but with the tight control over the app-store Apple does not do itself a favor. I think (and fear maybe?) that Apple will suffer once more from its closed policy, same as with the personal computer. They do it best, but they do it the Apple way, which means they value control over the user experience higher then the freedom of choice what to run on their products. And with the ipod/phone/pad OS X being in focus somehow Mac OS is a bit neglected. There are still bugs in Snow Leopard, more then I would want to see.
Maybe Apple would be better off without the strong signature style of Steve Jobs, he should maybe slowly play a less important role, consult on strategy and technology, but I think a lot of this "closed Apple experience" is due to his personal ideology.
The NPD Group published results from the first quarter of 2010 which reveals that Android-based smartphones outsold the iPhone for the first time in the U.S. According to their data, Android-based phones accounted for 28% of smartphone sales while the iPhone accounted for 21%. Meanwhile, RIM remains the market leader at 36%.
NPD attributes the growth to strong promotion as well as broader carrier coverage for Android devices. The iPhone is currently sold only by AT&T. While AT&T does make up 32% of the smartphone market, they are the only provider that offers the iPhone at this time. Verizon (30%), T-Mobile (17%) and Sprint (15%) make up the bulk of the rest of the market. The numbers may also reflect the late lifecycle of the iPhone 3GS compared to the newer android devices. Apple is also widely expected to revise the iPhone in the next month.
Apple has also been rumored to be expanding iPhone distribution beyond AT&T, though the exact timeframe remains up for debate.
Article Link: Android Smartphone Sales Exceed iPhone in the U.S. for First Time
It's amazing that people continue to come to MacRumors and gripe about the pro-Apple perspective.![]()
OMG, an online survey determines that there are more interest in free products than premium products.
I went to Verizon store and put a Android in hand and was not impressed at all, felt like a Windows based phone
My friend just got an "Incredible" phone, and after playing around with it, I was incredulous. The user interface and is not even close to the experience on the iPhone.
I expect iPhone sales to sag until the new model comes out. Your advice in the Mac Rumors Buyers Guide is "Don't Buy!" It makes sense. I want the newest version and am willing to wait. Wait for the end of year numbers before writing off the iPhone.
I'd rather get the upfront subsidy. If I want to bail out early I'll pay the ETF and make up for it by selling the phone.
Don't all U.S. carriers require some sort of contract - or increased pricing in lieu of - when it comes to data plans on smartphones? I don't know as I've never had an unlocked device, but I don't think you can just roam from carrier to carrier without any sort of time commitment or financial penalty or increased monthly premium. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
This whole thread is absurd.
So all of this bickering about which OS/phone is better is retarded. Buy what you like, and get over yourself.
Best comment of the thread.
Its as if they have something to prove by coming here and griping. Seriously...
Er, yes there is.and the fact there is not a iTunes type store to purchase apps
That is like saying Ford sells more cars than Prius.
Android is an OS sold by dozens of manufactures, while iPhone with it's OS is sold by Apple only - there's only the 3G and 3GS.
How's the exclusive carrier strategy working out for you Apple? Never was able to participate in the 3G part of Apple's strategy and now my wife and I are perfectly happy with HTC Eris and Incredible. I always wondered if Apple was covering up a larger issue with dropped calls with the exclusive agreement.
CUPERTINO, CaliforniaJanuary 25, 2010Apple® today announced financial results for its fiscal 2010 first quarter ended December 26, 2009. The Company posted revenue of $15.68 billion and a net quarterly profit of $3.38 billion, or $3.67 per diluted share. These results compare to revenue of $11.88 billion and net quarterly profit of $2.26 billion, or $2.50 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter. Gross margin was 40.9 percent, up from 37.9 percent in the year-ago quarter. International sales accounted for 58 percent of the quarters revenue.
Apple sold 3.36 million Macintosh® computers during the quarter, representing a 33 percent unit increase over the year-ago quarter. The Company sold 8.7 million iPhones in the quarter, representing 100 percent unit growth over the year-ago quarter. Apple sold 21 million iPods during the quarter, representing an eight percent unit decline from the year-ago quarter.
There are a few arguments I find interesting/misleading, including this one. Sure, people aren't buying the Iphone while they wait for the new one. But people stopped buying the Droid waiting for the Incredible and they also stopped buying the Hero awaiting the Evo.
It may be a trick to show more "sales" than the Iphone, but Apple does the a similar type thing by counting all the Ipads sitting on the shelves at Best Buy as sales.
Add Verizon and T-mobile. Instantly available to 47% greater market.
T-Mobile at least. Since it wouldn't require a radio change.
Check out the XDA Developers forum. http://forum.xda-developers.com/
Plenty of people porting newer roms to various Android devices. If the bootloaders can be unlocked, there is no such thing as no update.
The G1 already has a few Android 2.1 roms and I posted a vid of it earlier. Once the source code is out there and the people like Cyanogen do their magic, newer user genreated software and features are possible.
Agreed. I think the 1-model-per-year strategy Apple is currently sticking with will be suicidal when we'll be seeing new Android models every other day. I think they need at least a 6-month refresh.
I'm saying why not benefit from hardware subsidization from the carrier if you have to pay them their $30/month fee anyway?
Me on iPhone: $199 + $30/month
You on Nexus One: $529 + $30/month
The whole "unlocked" thing doesn't offer me any real advantage if I still have to pay equivalent monthly fees (which I do).
You guys must not have been running the super cool Glazed Donut skin that makes all the Android lameness go away.
And extra points to dbwie for coming up with the next Droid model name: the Droid Incredulous.![]()