Many things...except for, you know, updating your device to the latest Android OS release.![]()
Kinda like how the iPhone 2G can't be upgraded to 4.0, right?
Many things...except for, you know, updating your device to the latest Android OS release.![]()
This is an assumption, but I would think that the majority of the coming-up iPhone sales will be to people who already own an iPhone. Geez, it would have been out for 4 years by then.
You would think if you're going to get an iPhone, you'd already have one.
Geez, it would have been out for 4 years by then. You would think if you're going to get an iPhone, you'd already have one.
Kinda like how the iPhone 2G can't be upgraded to 4.0, right?
It's almost in our (iPhone fans) favor that it isn't the best seller. It will only lead to Apple producing better phones. You know, the good aspect of competition.
Consequently, no one is throwing this "free and open" tag around regarding the iPhone.
But hey, Google loves you! *swig*
Well, look at it like this. Everyone already HAS the stupid iphone why would we be buying one every quarter? Everyone I know has it, seen everywhere. The people that buy the assdroid are still in contract with current providers. They can easily upgrade and stay with the same network. But iPhone IS the phone of choice.
5 Reasons why someone doesn't have the iphone.
1.) They hate Apple and don't want to "give in".
2.) They have a contract with another provider.
3.) They have been just to lazy to switch.
4.) They have never seen or used one.
5.) Mom and Dad wont let them.
PERIOD.
Many things...except for, you know, updating your device to the latest Android OS release.![]()
For many years, even decades now people have been saying "this is the year Linux will go mainstream." Well now maybe finally this is thr year Linux will go mainstream.
If Linux is on the #1 selling smart phone then it is pretty much mainstream already. So 2010 is the year.
And I hate that open sourced talk when some people talk about Android. If it was so open sourced then the users would never really have to wait for a new phone to get a new Android OS. They would go to Google and download the latest stuff for their phone but it is apparent that such a move would hurt new sales for Android cell phone makers. Duh!!!!!!!!
Scr** Android!!!!
More to the point, it's like saying all cars made by GM outsell the Lotus Elise.
Froyo will tackle that as they're decoupling applications and components to allow for updates over the market.
The NPD Group published results from the first quarter of 2010 which reveals that Android-based smartphones outsold the iPhone for the first time in the U.S. According to their data, Android-based phones accounted for 28% of smartphone sales while the iPhone accounted for 21%. Meanwhile, RIM remains the market leader at 36%.
NPD attributes the growth to strong promotion as well as broader carrier coverage for Android devices. The iPhone is currently sold only by AT&T. While AT&T does make up 32% of the smartphone market, they are the only provider that offers the iPhone at this time. Verizon (30%), T-Mobile (17%) and Sprint (15%) make up the bulk of the rest of the market. The numbers may also reflect the late lifecycle of the iPhone 3GS compared to the newer android devices. Apple is also widely expected to revise the iPhone in the next month.
Apple has also been rumored to be expanding iPhone distribution beyond AT&T, though the exact timeframe remains up for debate.
Article Link: Android Smartphone Sales Exceed iPhone in the U.S. for First Time
Open Source wins here.
If now only the producers would get their act together with updating their Android Versions on their smartphones. I have to say I like Mac OS, but with the tight control over the app-store Apple does not do itself a favor. I think (and fear maybe?) that Apple will suffer once more from its closed policy, same as with the personal computer. They do it best, but they do it the Apple way, which means they value control over the user experience higher then the freedom of choice what to run on their products. And with the ipod/phone/pad OS X being in focus somehow Mac OS is a bit neglected. There are still bugs in Snow Leopard, more then I would want to see.
Maybe Apple would be better off without the strong signature style of Steve Jobs, he should maybe slowly play a less important role, consult on strategy and technology, but I think a lot of this "closed Apple experience" is due to his personal ideology.
I think your numbers are a bit low.So a collection of 5+ devices (which are mostly offered 2 for 1) now outsell one single phone?
Who would've thought that?![]()
now let's compare something that matters.. Profits. Which platform are people actually willing to spend money on?
Android 2.1 already runs on the G1. Proof alone that Android is open enough for user created roms.Consequently, no one is throwing this "free and open" tag around regarding the iPhone.
But hey, Google loves you! *swig*
I see a lot of "will do" when it comes to Android. "Will run Flash." "Will have a better user experience." "Will allow you to update your G.x device to the latest OS." "Will have more apps and better quality apps."
That's all fine and dandy, but seems a bit disingenuous to compare a "someday" device to a "today" device. But that's what we often get in the Android vs. iPhone debate.