Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why is RCS important? Because advertising and marketing! Anything google does is in service to advertising. RCS allows them to extend adwords and DFA to mobile, so they can spam you directly by sending rich ads right to your mobile.

"RCS messaging could provide a powerful tool for businesses looking to engage with their audience like never before. It has the potential to extend the bounds of creativity in your marketing campaigns and could possibly help to make your efforts to connect with your clients more streamlined and meaningful."


Yup, so Apple should implement RCS support only if there is a way to detect the spammy content and suppress it. ;)
 
I know it’s a very unpopular opinion here, but all of the efforts in the past year to improve text communications between iPhones and android have been made by Google, and it is a shame that Apple is doing nothing on their end. Don’t know if RCS is the necessary answer, but it is as terrible for android and iPhone users to have all this mismatch in features and functionalities
That’s because Google missed the “messaging” train, like 15 times now. There’s absolutely no reason why a WhatsApp (that wasn’t even aligned with FaceBook at the time) should have taken the messaging world away from Google and at this point, they’re desperate to get their hands on ANY messaging data. They would like very much to be relevant in this space, but they’ve grown userbase and subsequently dumped them several times now… even Google fans are weary. :)

This is likely their last chance at it, BUT as Apple’s not going to waste a single minute on it, all the money they’re throwing at it could be better spent on ANY of their other revenue opportunities.
 
apple is probably inconveniencing it's own userbase more than getting more customers over imessage

Apple may not be the dominant phone OS vendor in the US, but iOS users are apparently the ones that matter because they're the ones worth the most advertising dollars.

If Apple implements RCS google and the carriers are going to make even more money from advertising, which is why google cares.

The pathetic thing is that the press (and apparently many of the public) still believes google cares about users. Google cares about users as long as google can monetize them, period.
 
Will Apple add the functionality into iMessage to automatically “convert” these Tapback texts into reactions? Probably not.

Just like how Apple fails to display a webpage preview when you text a link to someone using SMS. If you’re receiving that link on an Android phone, a webpage preview shows up in the same manner that it does via iMessage.

I remember my friend seeing my texts on an Android phone one time and he went, “Oh, you can see the webpage previews like that?” I was like, “Um, yeah?”

It wasn’t until I got an iPhone recently that I realized Apple artificially dumbs down this functionality in SMS threads. Typical Apple shenanigans.

SMS vs iMessage... the thread presentation itself uses a totally different rendering technique. SMS threads are "plain-text" with plain media embedded. iMessage threads are "rich-text" and rich media experiences.

Apple never artificially *dumbed down* anything. If they provided webpage summaries within SMS threads, that would be an enhancement (a deviation from the spec) that breaks from how SMS works across platforms. Presently, they adhere to the SMS spec correctly.
 
If Apple is okay with making Google the default search engine on their devices and Apple cares so much about our privacy, then that means Google is safe, right?
Oh, I’m sure if Google paid Apple $12 billion to support their “Google RCS”, that would go a long way towards it becoming a thing. In a way, it directly lets you know how important Google believes search is and how unimportant they believe “Google RCS” is.
 
Don’t know what answer you expect. We can pretend to live in a world where android users don’t exist. But they exist, and they are a fair share of the user base. Also, if you remove your fanboy glasses, there is nothing wrong to use Android. So why is Apple not trying to make the experience better for both kind of users when they use native message services?
Because it’s not up to Google or Apple, it’s up to the carriers. “Google RCS” is a thing with T-mobile ONLY because the carrier decided to make it a thing. Unfortunately, for those that want “Google RCS” on iPhones, T-mobile consciously tied it to “Google Messages”. There IS a Google Messages on iOS, but Google has not seen fit to add RCS to that. Still wondering why.
 
Again, not Google's fault. Apple doesn't allow third party SMS apps. Even if an RCS-only app was technically possible to implement, chances are it would get rejected by App Review.
Apple allows many many third party messaging apps… Google Messages is one. Google could add RCS messaging to their Messages app, JUST like their messaging app on Android, and Google Messages users on iPhone and Android would use Google Messages to communicate using “Google RCS”.

Apple Messages app supports the carrier protocols SMS and MMS and Apple’s own iMessage. “Google RCS” is not a carrier protocol. “Google RCS” is to Google Messages as iMessage is to Apple Messages. You have to use Apple Messages on an iPhone to communicate via iMessge, you have to use Google Messages on Android to communicate via “Google RCS”.
 
iMessage already does the exact same thing to an Android user.
When ever an iMessage user likes a message from an android user, it does the exact same thing. Sends a separate text message that the reader like your text.
Came to say this - glad someone beat me to it.
 
It's so weird to me when people fanboy and rush to defend Apple on stupid **** like this. Just implement RCS FFS. Android phones are the vast majority (~70%) of users in the world so it be nice to properly communicate with them.
The vast… and I mean VAST, majority of those phones are not using RCS. They’re using WhatsApp, LINE, WeChat… etc. If an iPhone user wants to communicate with the LARGEST number of Android users? They’re using one of the aforementioned apps.
 
Still prefer SMS since it's not bloated. I block anyone that sends annoying bloat.
 
I hope apple implements something that transforms this message to "Joe THE ANDROID USER reacted with Heart to 'let's go to the movies tonight.'" 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: diskrisk
I don't even know what that is, so nope, not the only one. But from context in this thread, I guess it's some way to respond to a message with an emoji that sticks to the original message? It doesn't seem like an Earth-shattering feature that would cause me to stop sending messages to Android wielding friends...
No, it’s not Earth shattering. And, aside from the US, the folks that WANT that are quite happy to just download the prevalent app in their region and use it. Only in the US are there Android and iPhone users that don’t know about the very many ways to deliver high quality images/videos/fancy text features (like letting folks know when you’re typing… SOOOO IMPORTANT) because they all start with “don’t use Google Messages” or “don’t use Apple Messages”. :)
 
Clean up your own house google:

Most likely because they want to be able to drop this as soon as possible in the easiest way possible. :) They have shut down so many other projects recently, the higher ups MUST realize that ever dollar spent on taking out ads, say, along a “single” street in NY is being wasted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macsplusmacs
SMS vs iMessage... the thread presentation itself uses a totally different rendering technique. SMS threads are "plain-text" with plain media embedded. iMessage threads are "rich-text" and rich media experiences.

Apple never artificially *dumbed down* anything. If they provided webpage summaries within SMS threads, that would be an enhancement (a deviation from the spec) that breaks from how SMS works across platforms. Presently, they adhere to the SMS spec correctly.
I understand completely. What I’m saying is Apple could build the ability for the Messages app to go and fetch a web preview for links it sees in an SMS thread, like Android. But they do not.
 
I have to wonder what his definition of "not highly requested" is? 1,000 people asking for it? 1 million? 1% of users, 30%? Plus, how many people know the difference between SMS, MMS, RCS, and even if they did, how many of the people whom want it actually know how to request it? I've seen quite a few people in charge say "Oh, these people don't want/need this," but never really ask them. The CEOs, managers, etc. are so detached from the end users, they don't know, much less appreciate, what the end users need.
Well, one tool they have now is that folks who are vocal about a thing are no strangers to twitter. They can check the #rcs or #googlercs messages to see how many folks would put in the effort to even tweet about it.

Answer, not very many. Maybe if there were, say 24 messages the last year about it, they’d… well, they’d still ignore it, but, as it is, there’s just not a lot of folks that seem very concerned OR excited about it.
 
I've said it many times, and will say it again. If your "revolutionary magical amazing" phone is riding on the coat-tails of a messaging app to keep users "locked in" then your phone must actually be complete garbage to begin with.
What’s even MORE amazing is… that’s all it takes. How many “revolutionary magical amazing” Android products have been released over the years that have fallen head first at the feet of a “garbage phone with a messaging app”.
 
Don’t know what answer you expect. We can pretend to live in a world where android users don’t exist. But they exist, and they are a fair share of the user base. Also, if you remove your fanboy glasses, there is nothing wrong to use Android. So why is Apple not trying to make the experience better for both kind of users when they use native message services?
Because if Apple makes it easier for Android to interact, they won't miss Apple and return
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.