Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yet you were the first one to bring it up. Go somewhere else to find things to complain about. There's enough negativity here already. Seriously, get bent.
get bent?

That's a hell of an insult.

I bring up an ongoing issue with internet bullies and gender inequality and you are getting mad at me?

LOL - your mom wouldn't like hearing this.
 
Awaiting the flood of hateful sexist male fanboy comments...


Fyi she's quite accomplished but will be belittled by males regardless of her accomplishments . Like it or not the tone is different if it were a male in the same role.

Incidentally, I don't dislike her in that role because she is female. I dislike her in that role because the changes that she has implemented for Apple (the merging of the online store with the website, and so many Apple Retail store changes made in the last couple of years) are largely not good ones for me as an Apple customer. It is possible to not like women or people of color for reasons that have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with them being such.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwkay
Most of Apple's offerings are practically commodities, like the glassware you drink from. You don't "upgrade" your coffee mug whenever Starbucks introduces a new reusable mug that holds more liquid than their last iteration. You keep using what you already own unless it leaks or breaks, because, you aren't lacking technology that gets the job done. The coffee mug is considered a solved problem in this day and age.

Likewise, the computer (desktops and laptops) market is pretty much saturated. You don't really *need* a faster computer to send emails or make a voice call. The majority of consumers are happy with their PC/Macs today, unless it no longer functions as intended. Over time, people should see less and less incentives to switch to, or upgrade their Macs to, the latest best Apple devices unless they actually need to replace what they already own, or they are going through changes in their day-to-day work.

As it gets harder to justify new purchases on technical specs alone, what do you suppose will drive people to buy from Apple (either as switchers or repeat customers) besides design, that will keep the company growing sustainably?

Apple is an affordable luxury brand. With a proven track record in high-fashion, I believe Angela Ahrendts is a great fit to contribute to the design of the complete Apple customer experience, which requires a great level of attention to detail in major points of interaction (billboard/online ads, store location, store layout, sales rep etiquette, packaging, Genius Bar, etc.)

I disagree. The thing is my iPhone would work indefinitely were it not for Apple pushing forced updates. You can't turn off the nag screen if you don't want to update but that is only a minor annoyance. The real problem is the entire ecosystem pushes you forward. For example, developers are now force updating apps. My bank app only runs on the latest version of iOS and even older versions of the app expire. This in effect "forces" me to update my phone eventually if I want to keep using mobile banking or the apps I use everyday. Another example, I was a Snow Leopard holdout until last month and would be still but my iPhone that I had been successfully using with iTunes 11 suddenly quit. A replacement of the exact same model through Applecare wouldn't sync with iTunes 11. In order to get my data back, I needed to upgrade to iTunes 12, which inexplicably can only be run on higher versions of the OS (there's no technical reason why it can't run on older OSes). So I had to update to El Capitain, which disrupted a well-oiled production machine. The minute my drinking glasses do that, I'll agree with you. Until then, I'll be drinking out of my 1960s era Mad Men Highball glasses. Because, you know, fashion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C00rDiNaT0r
They did get the iPod checkout though. Seems the only thing they kept from him. But unlike Apple they didn't get rid of the regular registers.

Nah. Still have the same IBM registers as Kmart/Sears/Pennies from circa 1994.

Big box mall retailers refuse to update their financial technology. Even Kohls have 1st gen touch screen LCDs that rarely work or are broken.

Retailers refuse to infuse more cash into their stores for tech/displays/fixtures.

Namely, Sears and Kmart refuse to put $1 into their stores. Coming from 6 years as a Sears Manager, we were told to paint the shelving and fixtures. Yes....paint. We also removed lightbulbs from the store floor and stockrooms to save power. When i saw that happen, I revised my resume quick and jumped ship faster than the crew from the Titanic.
 
Nah. Still have the same IBM registers as Kmart/Sears/Pennies from circa 1994.

Big box mall retailers refuse to update their financial technology. Even Kohls have 1st gen touch screen LCDs that rarely work or are broken.

Retailers refuse to infuse more cash into their stores for tech/displays/fixtures.

Namely, Sears and Kmart refuse to put $1 into their stores. Coming from 6 years as a Sears Manager, we were told to paint the shelving and fixtures. Yes....paint. We also removed lightbulbs from the store floor and stockrooms to save power. When i saw that happen, I revised my resume quick and jumped ship faster than the crew from the Titanic.
And then they throw on chip cards and Apple Pay and wonder why it runs so slow. Chips are really fast at Walgreens, but their registers run windows 7, not DOS
 
Let's keep it simple. Can anyone list the value added contributions this individual has made that have demonstrably provided a return on the stupid salary and options she gets ( and that couldn't have been made by any other hardworking marketing/retail specialist out there who earns a pittance in comparison)?
 
get bent?

That's a hell of an insult.

I bring up an ongoing issue with internet bullies and gender inequality and you are getting mad at me?

LOL - your mom wouldn't like hearing this.

There is no issue, you're making it up to cause artificial drama where none exists. So yeah, to poster you're replying to is right.

Internet bullying and gender inequality are real issues. So all you're doing it making light of the real problem and helping make it worse. You're not the solution YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.
 
There is no issue, you're making it up to cause artificial drama where none exists. So yeah, to poster you're replying to is right.

Internet bullying and gender inequality are real issues. So all you're doing it making light of the real problem and helping make it worse. You're not the solution YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.

wrong. once again spoken as a true abuser.

I stand behind Angela.

That is my motto.
 
wrong. once again spoken as a true abuser.

I stand behind Angela.

That is my motto.

Any interest in explaining why you think she has been so great for Apple, in terms of what she has indeed accomplished which someone else would't have?

I have been reading the thread from the beginning and I see you constantly shooting down posters who give specific reasons why they don't like what she has done, but your posts never explain why you think those reasons are not valid in your opinion and what your reasons are for thinking she is doing such a great job ...
 
Any interest in explaining why you think she has been so great for Apple, in terms of what she has indeed accomplished which someone else would't have?

I have been reading the thread from the beginning and I see you constantly shooting down posters who give specific reasons why they don't like what she has done, but your posts never explain why you think those reasons are not valid in your opinion and what your reasons are for thinking she is doing such a great job ...

No problem.

Angela was brought in to expand apple stores. She has succeeded. There are far more apple stores opening than Steve Jobs would have ever dreamed of.

Secondly she was brought in to improve on the customer experience. I believe she's done that based on the JD Power rankings of customers. I would confidently say that the apple experience in store is better today than it was a few years ago.

Finally she took over Dixon CEO John Browett. He was all about cost cutting. He was not a great fit for apple in terms of customers.

Angela is for customers and imo makes her a great fit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So I had to update to El Capitain, which disrupted a well-oiled production machine. The minute my drinking glasses do that, I'll agree with you. Until then, I'll be drinking out of my 1960s era Mad Men Highball glasses. Because, you know, fashion.

First of all, you have some great taste in drinks and glasses!

I have run into similar situation with incompatibilities, so I feel your pain. That's part of what I meant by "no longer functions as intended". That being said, Apple has gotten better at supporting older devices with the latest OS and security upgrades, effectively prolonging their hardware longevity.

My Early '09 Mac mini lasted me a good 7.5 years without a single issue until Sierra was released, and even now I can still use it for my web dev workflow. My parents are perfectly happy with their 4-year-old iPhone 5's, which is still supported for at least the coming year, even though the hardware is reaching "vintage" status.

For those who "hold it the right way" and not setting things up as "well-oiled production machines", which I think is the real majority (who likely don't frequent MacRumors) it will work just fine. Most people simply don't do much with their lives other than emails, YouTube/Netflix, facebook, Snapchat, Tinder, and so on. You get the picture..

P.S. Wouldn't you be able to do some level of banking with your bank's mobile website?
 
No problem.

Angela was brought in to expand apple stores. She has succeeded. There are far more apple stores opening than Steve Jobs would have ever dreamed of.

She did open new stores. But honesty is that such a great achievement when you come to a flourishing business like apple and the retail network was massively expending already before you joined?

Sales are now stagnating or dropping for key product lines and China is slowing down massively - and I think store openings will slow down accordingly.

Secondly she was brought in to improve on the customer experience. I believe she's done that based on the JD Power rankings of customers. I would confidently say that the apple experience in store is better today than it was a few years ago.

I'll just agree to disagree as it is really not my experience. I will not reiterate in details as I have partly explained it in a previous post but Apple Stores have became unclear for non Apple fanboys with some clueless staff as well, and the website does make buying non-mainstream products and accessories quite a pain.

I have basically had 3 experiences in the retail network in the past 2 years (no Apple Store in my country) and all have been mixed bags (and clearly on a downwards slope compared to my experience visiting Apple Stores regularly which started around 10 years ago). 2 are purchasing experiences whereby I eventually got what I wanted but had to spend more time than needed and double check things myself or wait for the sales staff to confirm something because they were not very aware of the product and services they are meant to sell. One is a support experience whereby my product was eventually fixed but getting an appointment at the genius bar was a pain (planning always full and need to plan 2 weeks in advance), I had to wait standing for 30 minutes as they were late and didn't have enough seats for the people waiting (that was a large flagship store in Paris).

Finally he took over Dixon CEO John Browett. He was all about cost cutting. He was not a great fit for apple in terms of customers.

Angela is for customers and imo makes her a great fit.

This is the one point on which I will agree, she seems to be the first person able to stay into the role for more than a few months after Ron Johnson's departure.
 
She did open new stores. But honesty is that such a great achievement when you come to a flourishing business like apple and the retail network was massively expending already before you joined?

Sales are now stagnating or dropping for key product lines and China is slowing down massively - and I think store openings will slow down accordingly.



I'll just agree to disagree as it is really not my experience. I will not reiterate in details as I have partly explained it in a previous post but Apple Stores have became unclear for non Apple fanboys with some clueless staff as well, and the website does make buying non-mainstream products and accessories quite a pain.

I have basically had 3 experiences in the retail network in the past 2 years (no Apple Store in my country) and all have been mixed bags (and clearly on a downwards slope compared to my experience visiting Apple Stores regularly which started around 10 years ago). 2 are purchasing experiences whereby I eventually got what I wanted but had to spend more time than needed and double check things myself or wait for the sales staff to confirm something because they were not very aware of the product and services they are meant to sell. One is a support experience whereby my product was eventually fixed but getting an appointment at the genius bar was a pain (planning always full and need to plan 2 weeks in advance), I had to wait standing for 30 minutes as they were late and didn't have enough seats for the people waiting (that was a large flagship store in Paris).



This is the one point on which I will agree, she seems to be the first person able to stay into the role for more than a few months after Ron Johnson's departure.

When it comes down to it - can we fault her for Apple's incremental updates to her products?

What are some suggestions that would help turn things around?

I thought her effort to stop apple nerds from showing up to wait in line was genius. Nobody likes waiting in lines regardless what a few apple loyalists say. She really pushed the customer from waisting away their lives in line.

Remember when she created Apple Appointments to try out the watch? That is unheard in the industry.

LOL - sounds ridiculous now to make an appointment to wait to try on a watch and not buy it but she was trying to train the customer to understand their complicated 1st iteration of a watch.
 
No problem.

Angela was brought in to expand apple stores. She has succeeded. There are far more apple stores opening than Steve Jobs would have ever dreamed of.

Secondly she was brought in to improve on the customer experience. I believe she's done that based on the JD Power rankings of customers. I would confidently say that the apple experience in store is better today than it was a few years ago.

Finally he took over Dixon CEO John Browett. He was all about cost cutting. He was not a great fit for apple in terms of customers.

Angela is for customers and imo makes her a great fit.

As an Apple customer, I hate shopping at the Apple Stores. The one Apple Store that I do enjoy spending time in is a store I enjoy specifically because they are not following her rules. Gone is QuickDrop (which, if you are a savvy power user who knows exactly what your Mac needs done to it was fantastic because it saved you the time of having to book a 15 minute appointment that wasn't necessary at all). Waiting for the Genius Bar at most Apple Stores feels like waiting for an appointment at the local DMV (and at least at the local DMV, they give you chairs to sit in). These are things that went bad under Browett and while the chaos factor that he introduced disappeared when she took the reins, the overall experience of being in an Apple Store did not improve. Furthermore, the merging of the Apple.com site and the Apple Online Store was and is still an unintuitive mess that still makes no sense and doesn't simplify anything whatsoever. I don't doubt that she was amazing with Burberry. But I have not been impressed with her at Apple. And I'll tell you right now, that has absolutely ZERO to do with whether she is a man or a woman.

Will second an above comment as well that substantially more Apple Store employees are inept than were in the Ron Johnson era. This can't solely be attributed to John Browett anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwkay and Denmac1
wrong. once again spoken as a true abuser.

I stand behind Angela.

That is my motto.

So I'm a true abuser based on what I just said?

You are an abuser by making a mockery of real issues so the real message is lost in your nonsense.
 
Er, no. When I buy a product in store and can not return it via mail, this is not integrated.
Here in China when you buy an Apple product in store you can't return it without a reason within 7 days while you can do so in online store. Not only not integrated, it feels a bit discriminated.
 
Fast forward almost ten years ago. Take a look at airports, restaurants, but also in business, hotels, hospitals. Smartphones are everywhere, and used for actual value-adding purposes. You could argue that this development would have emerged anyway and you could be right. But it was Apple that accelerated this development with the introduction of these two elements in a space of two years (2007 and 2008).
I can buy that, yeah. But Ahrendts certainly had nothing to do with this. ;-)
 
A well considered response. But I don't think Angela is the answer. While technology is moving ahead more slowly, transitioning into a lifestyle brand with fashion takes it away from the rather equitable model of the best technology you can buy at any price. That was the winning formula that made Apple the most valuable company in the world. Regardless of how much money you make, previous versions of the iPhone were the best mobile phone you could buy at any price. Celebs and other tastemakers didn't buy it because it was fashion forward, it was because it was the best. The move to make things gold, more exclusive and more expensive is not a great way to sustain one of the largest companies in the world. A boutique company perhaps. But Apple should continue to forge what made them great: better software that just works intuitively, hardware that is beautiful but ALSO functional (throw the pros a bone here) and great customer service. I feel like they've moved away from that recently. Less functional hardware (more form over function, more dongles), more buggy software that's released to make a ship date rather than release when it's fully baked, and significantly poorer customer service. My recent customer service experiences with Apple feel like they're the Microsoft or AT&T of the past. Too big to know they're doing it wrong.

I can see you've been engaged with Apple for a long time and I can def appreciate your perspective. It seems to me that Apple [and its long term fans] are suffering the blessings/curses of Apple rapidly transforming into a behemoth. The sad part is that Apple does not have to appeal or even cater to the loyal fanbase that got them where they are. They have really moved beyond that beloved, boutique, geek centric company into a centralized, global powerhouse. Apple as a company has "matured" and its major growth phase is probably over. They will be doing amazingly well to maintain their position at their current scale. Their products by and large are still excellent and competitive albeit less satisfying to coinniseurs of innovation or software functionality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: typecase
The fact that I don't like what she's done is based on performance, not her sex. The world is too thin-skinned nowadays and everyone is quick to pull out the gender or race card.
 
I can buy that, yeah. But Ahrendts certainly had nothing to do with this. ;-)

Oh, I'm totally with you on that.
[doublepost=1475607753][/doublepost]
The fact that I don't like what she's done is based on performance, not her sex. The world is too thin-skinned nowadays and everyone is quick to pull out the gender or race card.

The only things we have really seen her "do" is change the retail product release strategy (watches only on pre-order and stuff like that).

What we don't see is all the other changes she might have done to retail operations that are hidden to the consumer's eye.

If you think about this logically she must be doing really great things for Apple. Publicly she has had some issues (as just mentioned), and if those are the only things she has done, she would have already recieved a severance package. Remember that she does not have a track record at Apple like some other people that were let go in recent history.

In other words: Apple's retail strategy is so pivotal to the success of the company that they (shareholders et al) certainly would not allow someone to mess it up or do nothing. There is a lot that we don't know. The same goes for Cook by the way.
 
Oh, I'm totally with you on that.
[doublepost=1475607753][/doublepost]

The only things we have really seen her "do" is change the retail product release strategy (watches only on pre-order and stuff like that).

What we don't see is all the other changes she might have done to retail operations that are hidden to the consumer's eye.

If you think about this logically she must be doing really great things for Apple. Publicly she has had some issues (as just mentioned), and if those are the only things she has done, she would have already recieved a severance package. Remember that she does not have a track record at Apple like some other people that were let go in recent history.

In other words: Apple's retail strategy is so pivotal to the success of the company that they (shareholders et al) certainly would not allow someone to mess it up or do nothing. There is a lot that we don't know. The same goes for Cook by the way.

Very true and wise words!
 
I agree that it all depends on the viewpoint you take, but consider the following. I think the introduction of the iPhone and the app store a year later were pivotal for the mobile computing market. Of course elements, forms or versions of both of these existed in one way or the other, but neither had been introduced in an integrated way that actually facilitated a new use of the mobile phone.

Fast forward almost ten years ago. Take a look at airports, restaurants, but also in business, hotels, hospitals. Smartphones are everywhere, and used for actual value-adding purposes. You could argue that this development would have emerged anyway and you could be right. But it was Apple that accelerated this development with the introduction of these two elements in a space of two years (2007 and 2008).

So, we would have possibly been in a similar position now if Apple would have done nothing, but it is more probable that we are not. In that sense I think that Apple has absolutely been facilitating in a change that has touched everyone on this planet that uses a phone, and that is a lot of people.
This raises the question whether a 50 mio signing was a necessity, and worth the issues, to accomplish that.
My guess is that the expectations (50x the performance of an ordinary millionaire exec) can't be met by anybody (male or female, whether Angela or anyone else)
The way she overrated herself with the AppleWatch is exemplary (no fashion item, nowhere to be found in boutiques, airports, magazines, jewellery shops, completely failed positioning as a jewel or luxury item)
Employing and reviewing her is beyond Tim Cook's tenure, (so it does not happen) and degrades his relevance. Therefore, she is disturbing the line of hierarchy.
With her, Iovine, dr Dre and the likes the company is more about celebs than products. People who are busy to fulfill their own Greatness rather than work on the next Big Thing (which isn't to be)
 
Last edited:
I can see you've been engaged with Apple for a long time and I can def appreciate your perspective. It seems to me that Apple [and its long term fans] are suffering the blessings/curses of Apple rapidly transforming into a behemoth. The sad part is that Apple does not have to appeal or even cater to the loyal fanbase that got them where they are. They have really moved beyond that beloved, boutique, geek centric company into a centralized, global powerhouse. Apple as a company has "matured" and its major growth phase is probably over. They will be doing amazingly well to maintain their position at their current scale. Their products by and large are still excellent and competitive albeit less satisfying to coinniseurs of innovation or software functionality.

I agree completely. But there is a great sadness in this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Urban Joe
I can see you've been engaged with Apple for a long time and I can def appreciate your perspective. It seems to me that Apple [and its long term fans] are suffering the blessings/curses of Apple rapidly transforming into a behemoth. The sad part is that Apple does not have to appeal or even cater to the loyal fanbase that got them where they are. They have really moved beyond that beloved, boutique, geek centric company into a centralized, global powerhouse. Apple as a company has "matured" and its major growth phase is probably over. They will be doing amazingly well to maintain their position at their current scale. Their products by and large are still excellent and competitive albeit less satisfying to coinniseurs of innovation or software functionality.
And therefore we benchmark Apple against the world's powerhouses that HAVE a modern product catalogue, and do not waterboard their customers with Beta software.
Their VP's are in business and factories, and do not continuously flatter the world with selfies, celebs and Bentley's. Their corporate social responsibility is intrinsic. Gender-, sexual, or race diversity is part of their common sense. Their PR agenda has NOT become an obstacle for their business.
They deliver instead of phrasing emptiness into greatness.
 
Last edited:
And therefore we benchmark Apple against the world's powerhouses that HAVE a modern product catalogue, and do not waterboard their customers with Beta software.
Their VP's are in business and factories, and do not continuously flatter the world with selfies, celebs and Bentley's. Their corporate social responsibility is intrinsic. Gender-, sexual, or race diversity is part of their common sense. Their PR agenda has NOT become an obstacle for their business.
They deliver instead of phrasing emptiness into greatness.
Which companies are we discussing? It's hard to tell.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.