Maybe I missed something but...how does Sony manage to have such a powerful 13" model with i7 and nice discrete graphics?
SonyVaioZ height: 2,4-3,3 cm
AppleMacBook13: height: 2,4cm
for example...
Maybe I missed something but...how does Sony manage to have such a powerful 13" model with i7 and nice discrete graphics?
Can anyone tell me if the new 13" has the auto-switch graphics like the 15" and 17"?
All those explainations for the Core2Duo... BS!
This was a 100% business decision. If they want to put iX plus dedicated graphics into they 13" - they can do it! But they know that for the next refresh (new MBP generation) they have to redesign the MBPs so or so... They got a killer deal for a huge pile of C2Ds and are now making a nice profit margin.
Yes, the C2D is still ok for most people, but it is years old technology. Period!
And a year old technology is a bad thing? The CPU may have been out for a year, but that does not always mean its a bad decision to stay with it.
If you don't think its worth it then go and get the i5 or i7, its nice to know that for those that don't feel that its worth going to this new hardware that they can do that, nothing wrong with choice.
And a year old technology is a bad thing?
SonyVaioZ height: 2,4-3,3 cm
AppleMacBook13: height: 2,4cm
for example...
All current boxed software is sold on optical media. People still burn CDs and DVDs regularly.
Your idea is stupid for a bread and butter model like the 13" MBP.
I sold my blackbook, in part to get significantly longer battery life.still like the form factor, but not temped to move on from my old blackbook.
For years I've been saying I'd sacrifice some negligible processing horsepower to get much better battery life.Poor trade-off. Smaller battery? Big deal. Most people don't need a notebook that lasts 10 hours off a single charge.
hmm....
Intel should be extremely nervous that it actually makes sense for a major consumer computer company to stick with their old product rather than using their new one.
1. Crappy integrated GPU
2. Legal maneuvers to lock out much better competing integrated GPUs
3. CPU not really much of an improvement
It's no wonder that Apple is talking to AMD.
LOL, they're probably maintaining (the full) OS X on PPC and ARM, just in case.
FWIW, I'm told that there isn't much difference between the C2D and the i3.
Can anyone tell me if the new 13" has the auto-switch graphics like the 15" and 17"?
All current boxed software is sold on optical media. People still burn CDs and DVDs regularly.
Your idea is stupid for a bread and butter model like the 13" MBP.
All current boxed software is sold on optical media. People still burn CDs and DVDs regularly.
Your idea is stupid for a bread and butter model like the 13" MBP.
Something like 5 hard drive deaths in 2 years, 1 dodgy disc in 8 years.
All current boxed software is sold on optical media. People still burn CDs and DVDs regularly.
Your idea is stupid for a bread and butter model like the 13" MBP.
So, not even a centimeter taller at parts and literally poops all over Apple's comparable machine. Nice going Apple.
I swear, it's kind of amazing to me people still buy this stuff. Underpowered, and less capable. I just don't get it. Oh well, guess I will keep making software for iPad/iPhone as long as people are buying the stuff. Still can't say I understand it.
Poor trade-off. Smaller battery? Big deal. Most people don't need a notebook that lasts 10 hours off a single charge. 4-5 hours of battery life was considered good until the last year and a half, and I can think of almost no instances where > 5 hours of battery life would actually be useful to me. I'd rather have a decent cpu. Just my opinion of course, but this seems like the route apple should take for the macbook, not the pro.
I think you were not here when the MacBook Pro with 7 hour but non-removable battery was introduced. There were lots and lots of people posting that they even carried an extra battery to get ten hours battery life, and that the 7 hours in the MacBook Pro was nowhere near enough.