Any reason for an external USB 3.0 SSD?

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by kdoug, Jul 6, 2012.

  1. kdoug macrumors 6502a

    kdoug

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Location:
    Iowa City, IA USA
    #1
    Waiting for my rMBP and somebody mentioned installing an SSD in external USB 3.0 enclosure. Are there any speed advantages or are you bottlenecked with USB?
     
  2. SandboxGeneral Moderator

    SandboxGeneral

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Location:
    Orbiting a G-type Main Sequence Star
    #2
    The USB will be the biggest bottleneck, but it will still be quite fast for you. I doubt you'll be disappointed.
     
  3. gentlefury macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #3
    depends on the SSD speed...but yes it should be a LOT faster than USB2 or a 5200rpm platter drive.
     
  4. Trey M macrumors 6502a

    Trey M

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Location:
    USA
    #4
    With USB 3.0 I'd think that yes the USB bottleneck you but you would notice a pretty significant difference between a HDD and a SSD, even in an enclosure.
     
  5. daleski75 macrumors 65816

    daleski75

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Northampton, UK
    #5
    USB 3.0 should have sufficient bandwidth for most SSD's out there and this is something I am planning on doing to get a Samsung 830 for around 150 and a USB 3 enclosure for around 30 which is not much more than a thunderbolt caddy and cable.
     
  6. ACiB, Jul 6, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2012

    ACiB macrumors member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    #6
    You are wrong. USB is rated at 5 Gigabits per second which turn out to be 640 MegaBYTES per second. Taking into account real world numbers, lets say those 640 MB/s turn out to be around 540 MB/s.
    Now, a good consumer SSD such as Crucial's M4, Samsung's 830, Vertex many drives, Sandisk new ones and Intel's 530 read speeds lie around the 500 MB/s mark (write speeds vary depending on drive capacity, but are generally slower than read speeds) and so, the USB3 port is NOT a bottleneck in this specific case (SSD's 500 MB/s vs USB3's real world 540 MB/s).

    If you get a good USB3 enclosure and a good SSD, you're good to go.
     
  7. kdoug thread starter macrumors 6502a

    kdoug

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Location:
    Iowa City, IA USA
    #7
    This is the answer I was looking for. Any recommendations on a SATA III enclosure?
     
  8. mattonthemoon macrumors regular

    mattonthemoon

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    #8
    Get the Seagate Thunderbolt Adapter for your SSD, it's 2x faster than USB 3.0
     
  9. daleski75 macrumors 65816

    daleski75

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Northampton, UK
    #9
    Not sure thunderbolt for the extra outlay would add any benefits though.
     
  10. gentlefury macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #10
  11. kdoug thread starter macrumors 6502a

    kdoug

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Location:
    Iowa City, IA USA
    #11
    Best Buy, my Amazon showroom. :D
     
  12. gentlefury macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #12
    And they, just like circuit city, will go out of business before admitting they are doing it wrong!

    A little customer service goes a long way...but when I walk in and get ignored the whole time I'm there then when I finally approach someone to ask where something is and they have no clue, so I have to find it myself to find its 4x as much as on Amazon, you are doing something wrong.
     
  13. ACiB macrumors member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    #13
    I don't own any enclosures, but when buying hardware I've found a good thing to do is browse newegg.com search for what I'm looking and then filter by rating, and read some reviews. Hope that helps!
     
  14. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #14
    The real world numbers are more like 250MB/s

    [​IMG]
     
  15. gentlefury macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #15
    My SSD I will be enclosing is a 250/250 so if it can push full speed I will be VERY happy!!!
     
  16. ZipZap macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    #16
    I like this one:

    Click Me

    Neither are SATA 3.

    In fact finding SATA 3 in a 2.5" enclosure is quite difficult.
     
  17. MikhailT macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    #17
    You do understand that's a max speed by the hard drive and/or the external case itself, not the USB 3 limit?

    Anand didn't say which drive he used. Also, he said this:

    " (with all of my focus on Thunderbolt I actually don't have a 6Gbps UASP enabled USB 3.0 dock in house)"

    So he hasn't even tried the faster USB 3.0 drive yet.

    Also, barefeats shared a couple of benchmarks as well: http://www.barefeats.com/hard154.html

    You can see there are some differences between USB 3.0 docks.

    Hopefully, with UASP USB 3.0 docks, it should be able to go faster than 250MBps.
     
  18. kdoug thread starter macrumors 6502a

    kdoug

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Location:
    Iowa City, IA USA
    #18
  19. lcseds macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Location:
    NC, USA
    #19
  20. mattonthemoon macrumors regular

    mattonthemoon

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    #20
    if I pop my SATA III Vertex 3 SSD in a USB 3.0 enclosure that says its a SATA III enclosure I get about 100MB/s real world speed.

    Same drive with the seagate thunderbolt adapter I get 250MB/s read and write.
     
  21. heresjohnny macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    #21

    LOL - USB3 will never see anything close to it's theoretical max, same as USB 2.0 never hit it's 400Mbps. Just trust me on that. FWIW, USB2 typically maxes out around 25MBps, or 200Mbps. Firewire 800 used to be the best option on MBP's, but now we have thunderbolt.


    OP: If you are spending the $$ on a SSD, you might consider using it with Seagates Thunderbolt goflex adapter. (Remove the magnetic drive and replacing it with the ssd - there are youtube videos on how to do this.) Tests have shown it is (not surprisingly) way faster than USB3. This is what I intend to do with my 480GB Intel 520, that is sitting my now unused MBP17.
     
  22. arbitrage macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2009
    #22
    Don't want to hijack this thread but my question is related to the discussion so far.
    If I'm not using an SSD but instead just using a regular Seagate Go Flex 2.5" 5400 drive over USB3, I would assume that hooking that same drive to the Seagate TB adaptor would show no real benefit?? Is it correct to say that you need an SSD in order to see any speed benefits when comparing USB3 to TB? Even a 7200RPM drive wouldn't benefit from TB would it?

    Thanks.
     
  23. heresjohnny macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    #23
    Right.

    Technically, under very very intense benchmarking the lower latency of thunderbolt might show an extremely tiny improvement, but this would be impossible to notice by any human. ;)

    If your not running an SSD externally don't bother with the thunderbolt adaptor... Unless you want to free up a USB port.

    BTW, for anyone that is interested, here is a comparison of USB3 vs Thunderbolt vs SATA. Although I doubt the USB3.0 implementation they are using is the fastest around. (And the same holds true for their Thunderbolt implementation.)
     
  24. JohnRN macrumors member

    JohnRN

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #24

    I have one (OWC enclosure from eBay). I like it a lot. I tested my Samsung 830 512gb in it after doing a HDD to SSD clone and as hellhammer said 250 MB/s was what I was getting as well using black magic to test the connection. Obviously when I put it into my mbp the sped was almost double.
     
  25. Austin00 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    #25
    I'm doing exactly this and have not found a SATA III USB 3 enclosure at all (in the UK) for the samsung 830 256GB SSD i have in my old 2010 13" MBP.

    I've settled (for now) on an icybox enclosure that is SATA II. ~250Mbps will be sufficient for holding a lightroom library and other bits and bobs.

    Seems like we'll have to wait :(
     

Share This Page