Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Anyone going through Rolex withdrawal?

I have been wearing an automatic watch for the last 17 years. I own both an omega Seamaster professional and a Rolex date just.

I love my new Apple Watch. The messaging and phone notification is perfect for my work. I can now leave my phone safely on vibrate all the time. My job requires my being available 24/7.

However I am going through Rolex withdrawal! I miss the weight and the quality feel of both the Rolex and the Omega.

Anyone else?

waiting (im)patiently to put my Breitling in the watch case.:p

----------

So it's not just me

I wear mechanical watches and said to myself the AW will not replace my traditional watches but will merely be part of the rotation. For days when the Giants have day games that I want to monitor while at work, wear while working. So far I've worn the AW Sport everyday and today my SS Milanese loop will be delivered.

My mechanicals (Rolex, Omega, Breitling and Nomos) are hibernating right now...will not last long..I hope.

Ditto

----------

The nice thing about watches is that our arms are long.
As my ex wife and I would debate when i would buy another watch," how many watches can you wear at one time?" i would happily roll up my sleeves and say" how many can i fit on my arm" LOL
:)
 
I've had my GMT Master since 1986. Wore it all over the world. It's been part of a good chunk of my adult life.

I don't have my 42mm AW with BSB yet; I ordered at 00:27 so they're getting close to filling my order, according to the thread specifically for this device.

Not sure what I'll do. Love the Rolex, but it's old technology. I guess it depends on how much, and how many uses, I actually get out of the AW. It sounds great, but like everyone I'll have to see how many of its features I actually use.
 
For me, no version of the Apple watch is particularly attractive or well crafted when compared to a proper mechanical timepiece.

Most of the time it's a blank rectangular black slate.

To borrow your analogy. You can buy a Civic for 20k...or you can buy an 18k gold gilded Civic for 200k. Neither of which should be confused with a proper luxury vehicle.

----------



A boat/house is an asset, even if the cost of ownership is in the red. There is NO positive connotation to the word. You're argument would similarly mean that I can't call the plus sign in addition equation:

1+(-1) = 0

A "plus sign" because "addition" and "plus" in other contexts commonly refers to an increasingly positive sum.

Here is my issue. It isn't MY definition of asset... it is THE definition of asset.

To play your game though... I'll say this. You can borrow against your boat. You can borrow against your house. They are assets.

And that is exactly why people go broke acquiring these "assets". They borrow against their house to buy a car, a boat, vacations, and so on. That borrowed money is not free, you have to pay it back with interests. So now, not only do you have to pay your mortgage payment (if it's not already fully paid), you have to pay back with interests the things you spent against your house.

What people don't realize is that the first several years of that mortgage payment, they are paying just the interest. After about 10 years or so, they have to pay interests plus the principle borrowed. So most people get into trouble when they realize their payments start going up significantly. They have already stretched themselves thin from borrowing against their home, their mortgage payment goes up. There are lots of unexpected things that will happen. What if the house loses value? What if they lose their job? How can they sell the house when it's underwater (house valued lower than their mortgage), let alone all those things they have been spending on against their home?

But there's nothing wrong with borrowing against your home either. If you are smart and educated, you can profit from it.

Perhaps I'm wrong. These things are assets, but they are your bankers assets. They get interest payments from you. Worst case scenario, they take it back from you, and you are homeless. Then they'll sell it to the next guy. The banks considers an asset as something that can produce or generate them profit, like loaning out money. They don't care about feelings or sentimental value of some object or merchandise. Their definition of an asset is far different than your definition. So when someone tells you "This thing you plan to buy is an asset.", you better pay closer attention.

You guys might want to reflect and think back who's been telling you "Your house is an asset." Was it your real estate agent? Banker? Broker? Contractor? Because they all have a vested interest in selling it to you and profiting from that transaction. It is their asset, I can assure you of that. This is a team game, and they all have their own teams. You will always lose if you play their game by yourself. Once you paid them their cut, they don't care what you do with that house. They wouldn't care if you burn it down. They'll gladly sell you another one.

Does anyone know the origin of the word "mortgage"? Let me help you with that: Mort gaige (Death pledge). I'll let you do your own research if you care to know.

And your comment about the 20k car vs the 200k car. The bankers (or the car dealer) couldn't care less which one you could afford or which one you think you would look better in. They make a profit by selling it to you and you make payments to them. They will tell you "That car is an asset. It's going to maintain its value, maybe even increase." but there is no guarantee. The only thing that's guaranteed is they will either get their profit by you paying the bills or you will lose the car.

Now with all that said, you really should enjoy what you have. Whether that's a Rolex, Omega, or Apple Watch. Don't get bogged down about it being an asset or whatever you call it. If you got it because you want it, then enjoy it.
 
Last edited:
Now that watches (at least most of the models) are being delivered, what are your thoughts. I ordered the AW SS LB and it will be arriving tomorrow. I'm eager to check it out. On the SS Link Band thread, there seemed to be a number of people threatened by Rolexes and whom were adamant that the Link Band would be just as good as a Rolex band; "It wouldn't scratch at all".

My Rolex, worn for 30 years and only polished once, shows light scratching and still looks great. My first impression, when I saw the Apple LB in the Apple Store was the lightness of the band. It is very nice, but does not have the solidity of the Rolex. The band is probably less than half of the thickness of the Rolex.

For me, the differences in weight will take some getting used to.
 
Haven't gone back to traditional watches (including a president) since receiving my Apple Watch.. 2 weeks
 
Wearing my Submariner on my right wrist, 42 SS LB on my left. The Rolex feels very heavy on my right wrist. I had gotten completely used to the weight on my left.

We'll see how it goes.

For those not wearing yours now, what is your winding strategy?
 
Haven't gone back to traditional watches (including a president) since receiving my Apple Watch.. 2 weeks

Omega poc, Brietling SO II, Tag Aquaracer, Oris artix, all sitting in the safe since the 24th, struggling with the mental concept of moving them on, haven't managed to stop wearing the AW 42mm on classic leather.:confused:
 
Wearing my Submariner on my right wrist, 42 SS LB on my left.

Have you gotten any feedback from people about the fact you're wearing two watches? I expect this is going to become fairly normal, but I'm curious where we are in that process.
 
I imagine that getting the link one might be the best alternative (125g) also buying the gold one makes it 19g heavier if you can afford that. I wonder if apple will ever sell the gold link band to the public, that will surely make it at least 200g heavy which gets in Rolex territory.

I will probably have the same issue, my current watch is quite heavy and I'm really used to that and my upcoming apple watch is about half the weight.
 
I imagine that getting the link one might be the best alternative (125g) also buying the gold one makes it 19g heavier if you can afford that. I wonder if apple will ever sell the gold link band to the public, that will surely make it at least 200g heavy which gets in Rolex territory.

I will probably have the same issue, my current watch is quite heavy and I'm really used to that and my upcoming apple watch is about half the weight.

The interesting thing to me, so far, is that I like the feel of the Apple Watch of my left wrist more than the Rolex on my right. Even though I've always loved it, I don't miss the weight of the watch at all. Instead I notice how heavy the Rolex is on my right hand. This may just be because I'm not used to anything on that hand and I will quickly get over it. I'll keep everyone posted.
 
I am loving my AW. Love the much quicker and less distracting nature of the device. However, I must say I miss my Omega, Tissot, and Hamilton. Even miss my beater Timex Weekender. For a watch enthusiast like myself to keep these in the watch case shows how great the AW has been and can be.
 
Have you gotten any feedback from people about the fact you're wearing two watches? I expect this is going to become fairly normal, but I'm curious where we are in that process.

A great question, but I haven't been out and about with the watch enough yet to make an accurate comment. I'll keep you posted.

For what it's worth, I decided not to go with an analog face on the AW, I have a great one on the Rolex, so why compete with it! Instead I can complement it with a more digital interface on the AW. Indeed, the least useful part of the AW is probably the watch, except for it's astonishing accuracy. Perfect for setting the time on the Rolex.
 
Haven't worn my datejust since I got my watch a week ago. I'm sure I will again but right now loving the apple watch!
 
My watches are crying in a drawer and I couldn't be happier. There is no going back. The Apple Watch is just too useful. :apple:

I guess I could get a winder but I never had one before and they always start right up. I plan on wearing them a bit this summer for the pool and beach, so they will stay used, albeit ONLY at the pool and beach. :D
 
Wearing my Submariner on my right wrist, 42 SS LB on my left. The Rolex feels very heavy on my right wrist. I had gotten completely used to the weight on my left.

We'll see how it goes.

For those not wearing yours now, what is your winding strategy?

Are you actually wearing both of them in public lest you look like a tool?
 
Moving on to the future

I own over a dozen wonderful mechanical watches from the best Swiss makers for over 30 years now, along with some great digital ones. They are going into the back of my drawer now. Time to move on to new behavior.

I got myself an Apple Edition with a blue classic buckle and also an Apple Watch Space Black Stainless Steel with link bracelet. I will be cycling through them now. I will upgrade them when similar new smart watches are introduced by Apple or other manufacturers (hopefully from the Swiss brands that I admire).

I don't fully appreciate the point some are making about 'Made in China' vs 'Made in Switzerland'. That is really backward looking, IMHO. I also believe that 'hand made' is an over rated concept.

I was happy with mechanical watches until I saw the power of a smart watch and how it can help me improve my life, instead of a beautiful mechanical watch that only makes me feel good and signals to the world about my tastes. I will find other ways to satisfy that craving.

I am moving on to the future. It seems to suit me better.
 
Jony Ive on Swiss Watch industry

I am beginning to understand the argument about the vulnerability of the Swiss or other mechanical watch industry if it will not move with the times. I think the 'hand-crafted' mechanical watch will die out in one generation as an everyday object - my kids (teenagers) will probably treat them as antiques, just as those in my generation (I am 49) treat pocket watches.

I see many posts about how the mechanical industry bounced back from the quartz challenge. I think this is very different; it is no longer about telling the time but integrating a wearable computer into your life.

I am a big Apple product user, but I hope the watch industry creates a better response over the next few decades and gives me more credible and beautiful choices. There are some great brands built over a very long time and I am hopeful they will be resilient.
 
Are you actually wearing both of them in public lest you look like a tool?

I wear my mechanicals (not all at once) on my left wrist and my Apple Sport on my right wrist.

Do I look like a tool? Maybe. But then I look at what I consider tools with their sleeve tattoos and gauged ears running around everywhere and immediately think: "They don't care about what people think, so why should I?" At least I can take my Apple Watch off.

And honestly, the Apple Watch is a great computer. It's not a thing of beauty, and it's not a good watch. In fact, it's an awful watch IMO with the screen turning off constantly.
 
Anyone going through Rolex withdrawal?

I have been wearing an automatic watch for the last 17 years. I own both an omega Seamaster professional and a Rolex date just.

I love my new Apple Watch. The messaging and phone notification is perfect for my work. I can now leave my phone safely on vibrate all the time. My job requires my being available 24/7.

However I am going through Rolex withdrawal! I miss the weight and the quality feel of both the Rolex and the Omega.

Anyone else?
Rolex withdrawal? How dare you compare this low rent, low quality, trinket, child's toy to a Rolex. That's laughable.
 
Rolex withdrawal? How dare you compare this low rent, low quality, trinket, child's toy to a Rolex. That's laughable.

Bookmark this post and get back to me in 5 years.

Not only will Rolex et al be affected, they will attempt to have their own models with "smart" tech.
 
Rolex withdrawal? How dare you compare this low rent, low quality, trinket, child's toy to a Rolex. That's laughable.

From a jewelry point of view there is no comparison.

From a useful product point of view there is also no comparison as the Apple Watch wins hands down.

Even basic time keeping is amazing with the Apple Watch. It is by far the most accurate watch ever made.

Apple Watch accuracy is +/- .01 second for as long as it last.

Longines Quartz Conquest VHP +/- 12 seconds a year.

Rolex -4/+6 seconds per day! (only when new or newly serviced)

No Comparison
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.