milo said:No, the people complaining were whining about a situation they were ignorant of without knowing all the facts.
That's what ya get with a rumor site
milo said:No, the people complaining were whining about a situation they were ignorant of without knowing all the facts.
tleveque said:If I go and check my order status on the web site it says now:
Estimated
Shipped By Apr 17, 2006
This is next monday....
milo said:No, the people complaining were whining about a situation they were ignorant of without knowing all the facts.
You do that, you come off looking like an ass. No sympathy from me. Sad that so many mac users are such crybabies that they start blubbering even before details are announced.
iGary said:You own a copy?
Sorry, what does owning a copy of Aperture have to do with having an opinion on the reactions of some users?
ust the latest example the company is on a roll.
iGary said:Yeah, every Apple product I have owned in the last year, except my nano, has had to go in for repair (my G5 is currently having open heart surgery and I blew up two 30" ACD's before I got a good copy).
They're on a roll alright.
Dekator, you need to copy the URL of where those charts are and then paste it into the URL LINK box in the post interface for it to work. What you put in about does not work.dekator said:According to this site: http://www.final-cut-pro.de/stage/_inhalte/berichte/019_fcp_ub_test.shtml?navid=1
FCP 5.1 runs much faster on Intel Macs. Note: the site's in German but even if you don't read German, the graphs speak for themselves. Additional testing confirmed that FCP runs a good 2x faster on a MacBook Pro than on a G5 2x2GHz machine. Even faster on an Intel iMac. As the Mac Mini is essentially notebook technology I suspect it to perfrom on par with the MacBook Pro.
Make sure you read the ensuing discussion on that site for additional testing. (You'll figure out the numbers). So, I think there's a good chance Aperture too will perform pretty good on IntelMacs.
Multimedia said:Dekator, you need to copy the URL of where those charts are and then paste it into the URL LINK box in the post interface for it to work. What you put in about does not work.
I noticed when looking at the Aperture Minimum video card specification, that a top-of-the-line state-of-the-fart G5 Quad's Stock NVIDIA GeForce 6600 with 256 MB of video RAM and one Dual DVI port is TOO WEAK and not listed as a qualifying card. What the heck is up with that? They list a 6800 but not the 6600. Is that a typo or WHAT?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Minimum System Requirements
One of the following Macintosh computers:
Power Mac G5 with a 1.8 gigahertz (GHz) or faster PowerPC G5 processor
iMac with 1.8GHz or faster PowerPC G5 or Intel Core Duo processor
MacBook Pro
15- or 17-inch PowerBook G4 with a 1.25 GHz or faster PowerPC G4 processor
Mac OS X Tiger version 10.4.6 (or later)
1GB of RAM
Display with 1280-by-854 (or higher) resolution
One of the following graphics cards:
ATI Radeon x600 Pro or x600 XT
ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition
ATI Radeon X850 XT
ATI Radeon X1600
ATI Radeon 9800 XT or 9800 Pro
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
ATI Radeon 9600, 9600 XT, 9600 Pro, or 9650
ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 or 9600
ATI Mobility X1600
NVIDIA GeForce 6600 LE or 6600
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL or 6800 GT DDL
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
5GB of disk space for application, sample projects, and tutorial
DVD drive for installation
dogbone said:There's no point in complaining about the price drop, just act on what you now know. ie, don't buy any future Apple beta releases.
iGary said:Since when was Aperture 1.0 a beta?
Slow on a dual 2.0 G5 with 1.5GB RAM??? NOW I am getting worried... I have read about other people on MR claiming they can run Aperture 1.0 on a 1.5GHz PB. I just bought Aperture 1.1 and 1GB extra RAM for my MDD. Can someone please verify whether it is possible to run Aperture on an old MDD with 128 MB VRAM.kwajo.com said:well I installed Aperture 1.1 and it is definitely faster at most things, but still kind of disappointing on my dual 2.0 G5 with 1.5GB RAM.
ok, thanks... I guess I will have to live with a slightly sluggish system until I upgrade. The new PM should arrive soonkwajo.com said:well I mean it runs fine, but it's hardly speedy and at times isn't as smooth as most other programs on my machine. It'll probably run for you, and do everything you need, but i wouldn't expect a speed demon
I think for what its doing it runs REALLY well on my dual 1.8G5 with 3GB of ram. I love aperture, I had thoughts of going to lightroom during the dark ages of not having a universal version (for my imac I'm selling). But I do have some complaints.Dr.Gargoyle said:Slow on a dual 2.0 G5 with 1.5GB RAM??? NOW I am getting worried... I have read about other people on MR claiming they can run Aperture 1.0 on a 1.5GHz PB. I just bought Aperture 1.1 and 1GB extra RAM for my MDD. Can someone please verify whether it is possible to run Aperture on an old MDD with 128 MB VRAM.![]()
I am trying to avoid upgrading my desktop before PM goes Intel.
It's like that on purpose. They're only trying to help by making sure you suffer for your art.dogbone said:I'm stil waiting for Corel Painter to come out of beta.
bluebomberman said:I agree with the angry mob! Early adopters will be shafted by a $200 price drop. They could have at least waited a few more months to lower the price.
Here's hoping Apple provides rebates for those who paid $499 for beta-quality software.