Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How do you generate your GPS tracks? Do you use a standalone GPS tracking device? If so, what is it?

before i took always reference pictures with iPhone, that was a but additional work, but worked ok.
now i got some GPS logger. Columbus V-900
it's cheaper than a full gps, also quite small and light, …
on a full charge it loggs about a day for every second, or almost a month in spy mode (every 15/20min a waypoint)

so now i am looking forward for the next real offroad experience :)

ps: i had some issues importing iphoto library into aperture, but since that is done it is already much much more stable. just memory consumption is quite high more than would be reasonable(!) so i started to take it more easy with it. what really bugs me are the things that just don't work at all. like exporting with watermarks, or updating the vaults in some situations.
 
aperture 3

just go it, installed it no problems. Have iPhoto 09 and imported 2,000 RAW images, no problem. interface is intuitive and have had fun learning it. I like the way non-distructive edits work and the ability to apply them in any order to get what you need. It does seem to use some memory, this will be corrected as time goes.
 
A little referenced file handling exercise...

Yes and using referenced files in Aperture works the exact same way. I have switched disks + computer numerous times and it works just fine in Aperture. Please stop with the FUD.

No it does not. I'm really amazed about how many people speak up without having any idea what they're talking about (i.e. spread FUD as you bluntly put it).

Let me try a different thing here by phrasing it as an exercise:
"Insert a memory card containing RAW+JPEG OOC shots into a memory reader connected via USB. Open them up in your application without importing/moving/copying the files to a different location.
1) Consider half of the images are bad shots you want to delete; inspect your files using your application and imediately move the bad RAW and accompanying JPEG files out of your sight (trash or immediate deletion) without remembering the filename and doing it via the Finder.
2) Now consider you found out that most of the images are pretty fine but you want to change the white balance of one of the remaining shots and export it as a JPEG overwriting the original version with the bad white balance"

This is just a broken down problem to avoid longer technical explanations but for those (rightfully!) pointing out, that one should never to 2) at least, the real usecase involving Pro-grade networked systems and NAS is much more complicated and does work with any application I've tried to far including LR, SilkyPix and several products but *not* Aperture.

It's great the product works for you in simple setups using internal or external HFS(+) formatted storage (hopefully for you at least RAID-1 with regular backups) but when you're in a heterogenous environment or have slightly higher standards of operation using the usual, when every problem can be declared a nail I only need a hammer - approach, just doesn't cut it.

--
Servus, Daniel
 
I've had zero problems with converting my existing (20K+ photos) Aperture 2 library to Aperture 3. I've also had zero speed issues with Aperture 3. In fact, it is quite noticeably snappier than Aperture 2. If I'm having memory leak issues, I'm not aware of it.

However... Aperture 3 significantly changed the way the "Import/Folders As Projects" function works. Such that, given how I do my workflow, it creates a LOT of extra work for me. I posted about it in the Apple support forums and one other user replied that it was the "Dumbing down of Aperture".

This change has so inconvenienced my file management and workflow routine that I sent off a message to Aperture Feedback and copied the entire thing directly to Steve Jobs.

Mark
 
I'm surprised. Aperture 3 works great for me, and it's he'll of alot snappier than aperture 2. I think it's a great upgrade. Too bad fir all the issues people are having.

I have an old gen 24" iMac (white).
 
Fix this!

Fixed it for you.

FWIW, I've been using Aperture 3 extensively since the trial was released, and have not had these issues.

Ah, these clever, funny and witty 'fixed it for ya' comments! Here is one for ya, fella:

Aperture causes hangs and memory leak issues for some users.
 
i noticed aperture works on 10.5 and 10.6. when running after effects, i encounter massive page outs (and corresponding system instability) far more frequently in 10.6 than i ever did in 10.5. has anyone determined if the OS version has any correlation to these aperture memory leaks?
 
Imported a 2.x library with more than 25,000 photos, and no problems like these so far (though I have seen some glitchy behavior).
 
Apples secrecy is a hindrance to performance

What ever happened to using public betas to get rid of these issues?
I had this problem and refuse to even try it again until there is a known fix.
 
Just to be clear on the scale of the issue, for some users (me included)

This isn't just about AP3, or all other versions of aperture using a lot of swap space. And it's not about the upgrade just taking a long time. And it's not because people have 'badly organised libraries'

I have an 8 core Mac Pro, with 8gb of physical memory. I've got over 400 gb free on my boot drive for swap space, and a raid pair where the library resides.

I've tried rebuilding my library and all the other first aid options available, but it's not doing me a lot of good. My library is meticulously organised.

When I try to convert my library, either in one hit, or by unchecking the original checkbox at upgrade time, all goes well for a while. But the conversion process, at some point, suddenly devours all the available physical memory, then rapidly builds a swap file up to the available maximum of 450gb. At this point the OS can't allocate any more available swap space and grinds to a halt. Obviously once all physical RAM is used and swap file size gets ridiculous, the machine is unusable.

I simply don't accept this is what one should expect for an initial release. I only have around 5000 photos and an initial library size of less that 50gb. So clearly there's something seriously wrong with how the application is performing. The test cycle for this release looks to have been deficient.
 
... at some point, suddenly devours all the available physical memory, then rapidly builds a swap file up to the available maximum of 450gb. At this point the OS can't allocate any more available swap space and grinds to a halt....


This is a symptom on a 64-bit OS and app. In a 32-bit environment it would reach a 4GB memory limit and then dispaly a message saying it was out of RAM.

But a 64-bit app will fill even a TB drive with swap before reaching the limit of memory address space. This is the first time I've hear of this kind of error but I bet it will be more and more common now that address space is larger than a disk drive.

Other UNIX based OSes allow you to place a limit on the amount of virtual memory that a process can use. Setting this at something big like but still smaller then the free space on the swap drive would allow a run away process to stop and report and error rather than hang t system.

I suspect Mac OS X inherits some method of limiting process from BSD UNIX. Likelytheir is not point easy point and click way to set the limit but I bet it is there. I've played with this in other BSD based systems going back 20 years to the old SunOS.
 
What ever happened to using public betas to get rid of these issues?
I had this problem and refuse to even try it again until there is a known fix.

Some companies do public betas. Apple prefers secrecy and "events" where Steve announces new "revolutionary" features. So live with this.
 
What ever happened to using public betas to get rid of these issues?
I had this problem and refuse to even try it again until there is a known fix.

Beta would make sense. Adobe does it, Microsoft as well. However, Apple seems to leave the beta work to the X.0 - X.2 users. There is a reason many will not install an Apple OS until it has reached the X.3 threshold.
 
Wow...SPEAK FROM EXPERIENCE......

So if you use LR..SHUT UP...you dont know what you are talking about...I had the problem..I have 65000 RAW images in my AP2 library...keept tidy and organized..referenced from my 4GB RAID on my Mac Pro Quad 3Ghz 8GB RAM and SL... it took 12 hours to upgrade my library then crashed...did it a 2nd time and crashed again at 98%....I open AP 3 repaired the library, trased my previews, opened Ap 3 and told it to generate previews...now it runs WAY faster than AP2 and NO CRASHES....NOT ONE....yes it was a rocky upgrade...but I did it and so can everyone else IF they encounter this issue...its like 1 in 100 who have the problem...so its not a common thing. Also I have used both and speed, performance, and features AP3 blows LR 2 (or beta 3) out of the water....the brushes, tools, and rest of the featires make it a very slick and well rounded product...LR just fees like a PS plug in...which it basically is...
 
Apple the "NEW" Microsoft

So what does Microsoft do with all of it's billions in profit? Nothing but generate more billions in profit. They don't build anything new or innovative, they don't fix issues with their already buggy and relatively useless OS. Apple of late seems to be going down a similar path.

Everything they build lately has been disappointing. Let's go down the list.

Snow Leopard: was supposed to be an "under the hood" revamp of Leopard that was supposed to make the OS more stable, and yet 6 months after it's release we are still seeing problems with it. Appalling when you consider that Apple keeps such strict control over it's products and forces it's third party developers to jump through hoops. We as consumers bought into this BS hoping for a better OS even though there weren't any new bells & whistles to speak of. A lot of us feel duped by Apple's marketing Dept. :(

iPhone: When it was first released it was just a mediocre phone with an excellent touch screen interface. Two years later the product hasn't evolved much and it's still just a mediocre phone with an excellent touch screen interface. I live in Japan and I have both an iPhone and a DoCoMo phone. My DoCoMo has an 8.1 MP camera that takes pictures and movies, a touch screen interface, a slide out key panel, built in TV, can be used as a train/bus pass, can be used to shop at convenience stores, vending machines, can be used as a credit card, can connect to the audio system in my Mercedes so I can speak "Hands Free" throught the system, has a finger print scanner on the back so it can only be accessed by me, and best of all it's tied to a carrier that actually cares about customer support and has well trained staff unlike Softbank, the carrier Apple chose to go with (I suspect for higher profit margin) that has terrible service and the worst signal reception in Japan. My DoCoMo phone is a far superior phone and it's a fraction the size of the iPhone. The only thing that the iPhone has going for it is the interface, the full web browser and iTunes store connectivity. Other than that, it's a ****** phone that hasn't advanced much in two years. :(


Mac Pro: hasn't been updated in a while and even when they do update it, it still won't have the very best graphics cards on the market (for some reason Apple always chooses the graphics card smack in the middle of the line up at any particular time and hails it as the best, but if you go to nVidia or ATI's website when a new Mac is released and check up on the card, you'll see that it's neither company's best offering but rather in the middle of their product line), will overcharge for RAM upgrades and will just offer what ever other PC manufacturer out there has in the way of Intel chip upgrades (albeit a few months earlier) minus Blu-Ray support and other things PC uses can rub in our Mac user faces all at a higher price.


Magic Mouse: Cute toy but it's not a proper mouse. By now Apple should realize that a three button mouse is an absolute must! Even some of Apple's own professional software require a three button mouse.


Apple remote: Useless peice of crap. Yes I too believe in simplicity in design and ergonomics but when you sacrifice functionality for simplicity, that's just plain stupidity. Try entering a search for a song on an AppleTV with an Apple Remote, a very painful exercise. And now it's a shiny new aluminum piece of crap. Big deal. In it's second release the best you could come up with was changing the material from which it is made? Bravo Apple. :(


iPad: what a joke. I'm sure they'll make plenty of money from it, but it's really just a huge iPhone with a slightly better touch screen interface.


As a professional motion graphics designer, I know I speak for hundreds of people who couldn't be more dissatisfied with Apple's Motion 4. After halting production on Shake and teasing us with rumors of the upcoming Phenomenon, we were treated to 3D shadows and refections. I guess I'll be using Adobe AE from on.

And the list goes on:
AppleTV with touchy connectivity, no support for 1080p HD video and terrible interface, Airport Base Station has always been bad with no control over advanced settings (guess Apple figures we're too stupid to know how to set up our own security), and now 5 Ghz wireless connectivity problems, Mac Book Pro with glossy screens (not useful for pro designers), Wireless keyboard with no number pad, home keys etc... (just plain annoying), Screen flickering iMacs, Even their latest release of Aperture (only out for a few days) is already seeing reports of problems. How can this be if Apple designs both the hardware and software? Isn't this supposed to be why we buy Apple, for the seamless user experience?


Apple used to be an innovative company that leapfrogged it's competition with compelling products and superior service. Now I'm afraid it has just become a huge corporate entity that uses it money and market share to overhype mediocre products that it could undoubtedly make better.

I have every one of these Apple products I mentioned above (with the exception of the iPad of course) and I have been an apple user since before some of you were even born, so before you decide to flame me about this post, think differently. Apple is not the company it used to be and it's a damn shame.
 
A dog

I won't even go through the specs of my two Mac machines I upgraded to Aperture 3 on. After waiting 45 minutes to get a live person from Mac support on the phone I got the per usual dah questions. How much RAM, OS version, etc. Let's say I have way more than required. The woman was of no help.

"Processing" spinning wheel is all I get. It sucks down all the RAM on my machine(S) for hours!!!! When it is finally done it is of no results. I shoot on film and scan my negative myself. I will make a large file scan for a large print (about 190 MB tiff) then import it to my Aperture 3 library. Here we go again--another hour or so of "processing" before I can work with it. This DID NOT happen at all with Aperture 2.

Why can't Apple admit they made a major mistake releasing Aperture 3 before beta testing. There are many others out there on forums with the same problem. Congrats for those who say WE are nuts and it works fine. That is of no help to the many of us!
 
So what does Microsoft do with all of it's billions in profit? Nothing but generate more billions in profit. They don't build anything new or innovative, they don't fix issues with their already buggy and relatively useless OS. Apple of late seems to be going down a similar path.

Everything they build lately has been disappointing. Let's go down the list.

Snow Leopard: was supposed to be an "under the hood" revamp of Leopard that was supposed to make the OS more stable, and yet 6 months after it's release we are still seeing problems with it. Appalling when you consider that Apple keeps such strict control over it's products and forces it's third party developers to jump through hoops. We as consumers bought into this BS hoping for a better OS even though there weren't any new bells & whistles to speak of. A lot of us feel duped by Apple's marketing Dept. :(

iPhone: When it was first released it was just a mediocre phone with an excellent touch screen interface. Two years later the product hasn't evolved much and it's still just a mediocre phone with an excellent touch screen interface. I live in Japan and I have both an iPhone and a DoCoMo phone. My DoCoMo has an 8.1 MP camera that takes pictures and movies, a touch screen interface, a slide out key panel, built in TV, can be used as a train/bus pass, can be used to shop at convenience stores, vending machines, can be used as a credit card, can connect to the audio system in my Mercedes so I can speak "Hands Free" throught the system, has a finger print scanner on the back so it can only be accessed by me, and best of all it's tied to a carrier that actually cares about customer support and has well trained staff unlike Softbank, the carrier Apple chose to go with (I suspect for higher profit margin) that has terrible service and the worst signal reception in Japan. My DoCoMo phone is a far superior phone and it's a fraction the size of the iPhone. The only thing that the iPhone has going for it is the interface, the full web browser and iTunes store connectivity. Other than that, it's a ****** phone that hasn't advanced much in two years. :(


Mac Pro: hasn't been updated in a while and even when they do update it, it still won't have the very best graphics cards on the market (for some reason Apple always chooses the graphics card smack in the middle of the line up at any particular time and hails it as the best, but if you go to nVidia or ATI's website when a new Mac is released and check up on the card, you'll see that it's neither company's best offering but rather in the middle of their product line), will overcharge for RAM upgrades and will just offer what ever other PC manufacturer out there has in the way of Intel chip upgrades (albeit a few months earlier) minus Blu-Ray support and other things PC uses can rub in our Mac user faces all at a higher price.


Magic Mouse: Cute toy but it's not a proper mouse. By now Apple should realize that a three button mouse is an absolute must! Even some of Apple's own professional software require a three button mouse.


Apple remote: Useless peice of crap. Yes I too believe in simplicity in design and ergonomics but when you sacrifice functionality for simplicity, that's just plain stupidity. Try entering a search for a song on an AppleTV with an Apple Remote, a very painful exercise. And now it's a shiny new aluminum piece of crap. Big deal. In it's second release the best you could come up with was changing the material from which it is made? Bravo Apple. :(


iPad: what a joke. I'm sure they'll make plenty of money from it, but it's really just a huge iPhone with a slightly better touch screen interface.


As a professional motion graphics designer, I know I speak for hundreds of people who couldn't be more dissatisfied with Apple's Motion 4. After halting production on Shake and teasing us with rumors of the upcoming Phenomenon, we were treated to 3D shadows and refections. I guess I'll be using Adobe AE from on.

And the list goes on:
AppleTV with touchy connectivity, no support for 1080p HD video and terrible interface, Airport Base Station has always been bad with no control over advanced settings (guess Apple figures we're too stupid to know how to set up our own security), and now 5 Ghz wireless connectivity problems, Mac Book Pro with glossy screens (not useful for pro designers), Wireless keyboard with no number pad, home keys etc... (just plain annoying), Screen flickering iMacs, Even their latest release of Aperture (only out for a few days) is already seeing reports of problems. How can this be if Apple designs both the hardware and software? Isn't this supposed to be why we buy Apple, for the seamless user experience?


Apple used to be an innovative company that leapfrogged it's competition with compelling products and superior service. Now I'm afraid it has just become a huge corporate entity that uses it money and market share to overhype mediocre products that it could undoubtedly make better.

I have every one of these Apple products I mentioned above (with the exception of the iPad of course) and I have been an apple user since before some of you were even born, so before you decide to flame me about this post, think differently. Apple is not the company it used to be and it's a damn shame.


yawn...


go and buy another companies products as you are clearly not happy.

no doubt about it, apple is a behemoth, pure and simple.
but If apple were to quit tomorrow you would be moaning how much you miss things..
 
yawn...


go and buy another companies products as you are clearly not happy.

no doubt about it, apple is a behemoth, pure and simple.
but If apple were to quit tomorrow you would be moaning how much you miss things..

And people like you with attitude like yours are exactly why corporations don't feel a need to make products any better. You'll keep buying crappy products and actually defend them against people like me with legitimate complaints.
 
IYHO. Alone the fact that the popular G series from Panasonic has been around for well over a year and that even older cameras like the *very* popular LX3 were added only recently show that you're dead wrong about this. Also the Olympus counterparts are *still* absent.

There are many people who cared, some of which are now LR users, others stayed with SilkyPix or looked at another solution.

Just the idea that I might buy a piece of non-Canikon hardware and not get support for another 1,5 years makes me *not* want to invest any dollar in Aperture.

And then, the resently added support is rather halfassed, too. I wouldn't be too surprised if that's the reason for some of the performance problems people are seeing.

--
Servus, Daniel

I am not dead wrong if you proved my point... especially since I wasn't stating any facts. The issue is that Aperture doesn't support camera X, if you are a user of camera X then you either get another program to fit your needs or change cameras. Those are your only two options.

I was a Pentax user before I started working for my first newspaper which shot all Nikon. If I wanted to use their glass I'd have to get a Nikon body so I did.

The have it your way attitude that we've all become used to just isn't going to cut it with Apple. With Apple it's take it or leave it, and luckily for us shooters there are plenty of great options out there besides Aperture.

Again, it's my opinion that most of user complaining about RAW compatibility don't shoot RAW, don't need to, or don't have a camera that's left out of the list.

.... blah ....

Where've you been for the past 4 years! Is it me or are the people whining waking up from comas? Trolling about things talked to death ... not to mention that these things are still OPINIONS.
 
Everything they build lately has been disappointing. Let's go down the list.
Could you please stop using Apple products so we don't have to read through these rants? If you're hoping that making enough people crazy will get them to take up a collection to buy you a Dell and a universal remote, you're barking up the wrong tree.

Do you realize that no where in that rant did you discuss Aperture 3-- the subject of this thread and probably the one complaint you would get the readers to sympathize with?
My DoCoMo has an 8.1 MP camera that takes pictures and movies, a touch screen interface, a slide out key panel, built in TV, can be used as a train/bus pass, can be used to shop at convenience stores, vending machines, can be used as a credit card, can connect to the audio system in my Mercedes so I can speak "Hands Free" throught the system, has a finger print scanner on the back so it can only be accessed by me, and ... My DoCoMo phone is a far superior phone.
Yes I too believe in simplicity in design and ergonomics ...
Don't kid yourself...
 
And what are these forums for?

These forums should be about discussing problems and holding companies responsible for the products they make, but you egotistical *******s have your heads so far up your asses, you focus your sights on me instead trying to discuss ways to make Apple a better company or at least the company it could and should be. A better Apple means better Aperture and none of these 'major' problems that people are experiencing.

Just because I don't kiss the ass of the corporation I buy products from doesn't mean I can't buy their products or complain about problems. You fanboys need to wake up.

And since I am a certified Apple instructor of Final Cut Studio, have been a guest speaker at both Apple Stores and Universities throughout Japan on Apple software and have been using Apple products for over 30 years, I think I may have a better insight, more user experience and first hand knowledge than many of you making an immature attempt to flame.

My rant however long it may be was factual and shows a recent consistency of Apple making bad to mediocre products and unless it's addressed publicly, it may continue. If you have any intelligence you would see that I'm trying to help Apple by addressing concerns publicly not because I don't like their products, but because I do and I want them improve their recent track record.
 
I have the memory leak too.

I'm going to buy it as soon as its patched because IME its much faster then Lightroom and I like the layout a lot better. I currently use Lightroom on my machine and when I use the two on the same photos, Aperture is much much faster.

The lack of brushes is what kept me away from aperture before but now that they are here I will be switching.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.