God, this is such a tired argument and completely untrue.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Abandoned Low-Cost TV Dongle Plans, but Looking to Double New Apple TV+ Content Rate in 2022
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
God, this is such a tired argument and completely untrue.
Agree. Also not sure if Apple can make it perform well as a stick. Maybe they can, but having used a Roku and an Apple TV the UI and fluidity is not even close.
If Apple TV+ would have a live TV feed with local channels, sports, etc, that was like youtubetv or hulu+ live TV, that would rule.
Apple excels at delivery beautiful 4K content, but also dolby atmos/5.1 sound.
No one service ties all this together.
I pay 70 ish bucks a month for YTTV. Great picture quality and ease of use, they cannot figure out how to deliver 5.1. its a running joke.
Interested in hulu+ live tv. Directv just rebranded. ATT live streaming I think.
I am actually surprised Apple has not done this. It would cement the need for an Apple TV device.
Apple excels at delivery beautiful 4K content, but also dolby atmos/5.1 sound.
No one service ties all this together.
I pay 70 ish bucks a month for YTTV. Great picture quality and ease of use, they cannot figure out how to deliver 5.1. its a running joke.
Interested in hulu+ live tv. Directv just rebranded. ATT live streaming I think.
I am actually surprised Apple has not done this. It would cement the need for an Apple TV device.
A TV stick from Apple would have only been worthwhile if it was good. I use an Apple TV because it is the best experience for a smart TV. Everything else feels like clunky garbage (kinda like using an Android phone in 2011 after using an iPhone). Even using the Amazon Prime Video app on Apple TV app feels like garbage (like I am suddenly using my Vizio’s built-in interface) — I would never want a Fire stick for that reason.
Folks who said that Apple needed a low-cost Apple TV to remain relevant are the same folks calling for a cheap garbage iPhone to compete with mid-tier Android phones 10 years ago — it would have been a horrible strategy.
The only good argument for an Apple TV stick was if it performed fluidly — just like the set top box — It need not play games well, but just be a travel version of Apple TV that you can take with you to watch content without leaving the Apple TV experience behind.
Folks who said that Apple needed a low-cost Apple TV to remain relevant are the same folks calling for a cheap garbage iPhone to compete with mid-tier Android phones 10 years ago — it would have been a horrible strategy.
The only good argument for an Apple TV stick was if it performed fluidly — just like the set top box — It need not play games well, but just be a travel version of Apple TV that you can take with you to watch content without leaving the Apple TV experience behind.
It is crazy that Apple created this much customer confusion and doesn't even seem to realize it. I've mentioned this before, but Apple made exactly the same naming mistake with AppleTV+ that Sony made with Playstation Vue. Playstation Vue was a streaming/cable-cutting service that was better in many ways than today's offerings (Hulu+, etc.), but the name made people incorrectly assume that you needed a Playstation device to use it, or at least that it somehow was gamer-focused. As a result, it never caught on the way it could have.
As to the dongle, I strongly suspect there is a market out there that actually wants dongles (for travel, for multiple-TV households, etc). It's not just a budget play; it's a play for a market Apple isn't reaching (the same reason I'm not buying a HomePod device -- I want my digital assistant of choice to be in every room in the house and Apple simply isn't competing for that use-case).
Sounds like a losing strategy. No hardware or content dominance. They're in limbo.
As for unlikeable characters like Jo on MQ, everyone I know thinks she's hilarious. If anyone is unlikeable on that show, it's the two testers who seem to add little comedic or storyline value.
As for unlikeable characters like Jo on MQ, everyone I know thinks she's hilarious. If anyone is unlikeable on that show, it's the two testers who seem to add little comedic or storyline value.
Had this been a Micro$oft-produced show there would be Surface Pros shoved in viewers faces with the SURFACE name shamelessly pushed in the screen. It’s bad enough the SURFACE name is shoved in viewer’s faces during football games. Not sure why you wouldn’t expect Apple to promote their hardware in their own shows? I wouldn’t expect them not to.
I wish they’d spend a little time refining their UI. it’s pretty much like a bomb went off.
You mean like the appletv4k? I have four of them and the new remote makes them awesome.
Bummer. Dongle-sized Apple TV would have been fantastic, even if it wasn't that cheap. Current Apple TV is a little too bulky compared to the competition, making it a pain for some setups.
Agreed I’ve watched a few shows on it, and that new SciFi series starts soon, can’t remember the name if it but I’m looking forward to it.
Dont want to damage our "premium" name by making ANYTHING we sell affordable. Phill Schiller is an asshat. I don't care what he's accomplished; that statement is elitist and doesn't at all represent a good business decision.
Okay, so I get the argument that apple wants to remain a premium brand. However, they do provide cheaper, less technically strong products, in other areas (i.e. iPod nano, iPhone SE/Xr, Apple Watch SE, etc) so why can't they have some sort of a middle ground?
My suggestion: provide the option for like a $50-70 streaming stick or box with 15gb max storage. Provide it with the old Apple remote.
By providing a cheapER product (ER does mean CHEAP) you are getting more customers that will say, "ah I mean $60 is a lot for a streaming device, but its only $20 more than the Amazon or Google one and it works super good with my iPhone"
This will pull in apple users that don't spend their work days refreshing macrumors for any ounce of new apple news ?
My suggestion: provide the option for like a $50-70 streaming stick or box with 15gb max storage. Provide it with the old Apple remote.
By providing a cheapER product (ER does mean CHEAP) you are getting more customers that will say, "ah I mean $60 is a lot for a streaming device, but its only $20 more than the Amazon or Google one and it works super good with my iPhone"
This will pull in apple users that don't spend their work days refreshing macrumors for any ounce of new apple news ?
This is why I like Roku UI. It’s very simple and to the point.
I tried a fire stick and it was terrible. So much advertising I could not focus.
I would like to read the full article, but I don’t want to pay a ridiculous subscription fee just to read only that one…
It is for media streamers like Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K and Chromecast with Google TV (currently has issue with app crashing) but doesn't appear to be available for download on Android phones and tablets even though it shows up in Google Play Store.
If they’re unwilling to create a cheaper dongle, the least they could do was to make an app for Android. There are so many people who want to watch their shows, but flat out refuse to watch them on a phone browser. And I don’t blame them. I don’t understand why they’re not entertaining this idea. They already have Apple Music on there, so what makes this any different?
Also, Jo is awesome in Mythic Quest. I love her snark and passive aggression.
Apple needs to build a TV. That's the only way to do the overall TV experience. Apple TV is just another box.