its a civil lawsuit there is no conviction. only monetary damages.If he's convicted he'll have plenty of time contemplating his stupid choices in life
its a civil lawsuit there is no conviction. only monetary damages.If he's convicted he'll have plenty of time contemplating his stupid choices in life
If he's convicted he'll have plenty of time contemplating his stupid choices in life
these retail employees didnt know the full extend of their rights, apple would walk a very fine line if any of them knows their constitutions.Of course it's different, I know that, but they do have their investigations into their employees. You would be surprised what they think they can and can't do. Remember the stories with Retail employees having their stuff searched daily? It only gets worse from there.
why you talking about criminal prosecution in a civil suit then.People think he should be punished and probably locked up, but by the legal system not Apple.
I think you are misinterpreting statements.
it's theft, not accidental. there's a clear motiveyour statements are non-sensical
They didn't cap grand-theft at 950, 487 says that under $950 is petty-theft, over 950 is grand-theft. If discovery shows the intent was to disclose Apple's data to a third party Apple will have no problem proving the damages exceed $950.sure, california penal code 487 capped max value for grand theft at 950 usd, first time offender is considered a misdemeanor. that is if the state prosecutor even bother prosecuting this as its almost the same level as stealing an iphone.
it's theft, not accidental. there's a clear motive
thats what i been stating this whole time, over 950 is grand theft, the value capped out at 950. abiet less than the value of a iphone.Under $950 is petty theft, over is grand theft. If discovery shows the intent was to disclose Apple's data to a third party Apple will have no problem proving the damages exceed $950.
Under $950 is petty theft, over is grand theft. If discovery shows the intent was to disclose Apple's data to a third party Apple will have no problem proving the damages exceed $950.
Yes, the value for petty theft is capped at 950.thats what i been stating this whole time, over 950 is grand theft, the value capped out at 950. abiet less than the value of a iphone.
Of course it's up to the prosecutor, but if discovery proves the intent was for third party disclosure the prosecutor will have no problem proving felony grand theft.still up to the prosecutor whether charge as a misdemeanour or felony, usually based on criminal history
yes, there is no disagreement here, im not sure what you are trying to address at this point.The value for petty theft is capped at 950.
Perhaps he was simply keeping a personal archive of his own work
Not sure what you're misunderstanding here, or just have a misconception of law and order. Downloading company data to an unauthorized personal drive and then going out of your way to conceal your actions are textbook theft. Easy conviction.No theft has been proven
And you don’t know the motive for the actions
Of course it's up to the prosecutor, but if discovery proves the intent was for third party disclosure the prosecutor will have no problem proving felony grand theft.
They them like seriously dude...
You replied to me as far out of context as possible just to have something to say. It was a rhetorical question supposed to have you think a little bit beyond the headline of this article.
You, or basically 99.9% of people who will read this article have zero clue as to what data he took with him. I merely suggested it could be his work, his work that maybe Apple turn down or didn't want, or maybe he couldn't get it further because getting though his bully manager was a PITA, maybe now Apple saw Snap take his idea and make it work and Apple realized they have the right to claim, who knows. Just giving out ideas to make people think in different directions other than the narrative...
I misunderstood when you said "sure, california penal code 487 capped max value for grand theft at 950 usd..." instead of "sure, california penal code 487 capped max value for petty theft at 950 usd".yes, there is no disagreement here, im not sure what you are trying to address at this point.
Not sure what you're misunderstanding here, or just have a misconception of law and order. Downloading company data to an unauthorized personal drive and then going out of your way to conceal your actions are textbook theft. Easy conviction.
obviously nothing has been proven yet, this is a comment thread you're on, not the actual trial lol...I’m not misunderstanding anything
Nothing has been proven yet
Certainly not that he has shared anything with his current employer, which you have stated “we have to assume”
Not that’s a misunderstanding of law
We don’t have to assume anything
obviously nothing has been proven yet, this is a comment thread you're on, not the actual trial lol...
we're already discussed this, not gonna run in circles with youI’m just pointing out that when you say that “we have to assume” that he’s shared stolen information with his current employer, your statement is entirely senseless