I'm sorry, but this is terrible news, especially for front page.
good thing it's not on the front page then.
arn
I'm sorry, but this is terrible news, especially for front page.
good thing it's not on the front page then.
arn
Whoever Acebo Industries is I bet they're probably now living in Tahiti with a lot of money.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)
What about itunse.com? That happens a lot with me when I go to google!
What about itunse.com? That happens a lot with me when I go to google!
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)
Apple makes a lucky squatter a millionaire all for being a sleazy bugger... greeeeat!
Yes, as a shareholder I'm very interested in that. Clearly this is just a domain name squatter troll company. Nice idea if the price isn't that high, but if they paid millions for these I'd rather see that money used elsewhere.
ahbdesign said:What about itunse.com? That happens a lot with me when I go to google!
Makes me sick really, parasites that make money from buying domain names similar to popular brands. To me it's anaglous to making a phone putting a pear on it with a bite out of it trademarked, then trying to sell it to apple so they can maintain the quality of their brand.
These people ad no value to the economy, to IT development, or the quality of the Internet.
Time to watch the MR Fanbois negative this post to hell.
good thing it's not on the front page then.
arn
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
Sure this isn't the most interesting story or a rumor persay, but it gives some indication as to what's going on behind the curtain in Cupertino, I'm glad MacRumors covered it. Besides, the lost iPhone should give you something to think about.
That's actually quite common, as your wife proves. Ask a non-technie (and even some techie people) to find a url and they won't type in the address, they'll google it, www and all sometimes. The benefit is usually the top hit(s) are what they're looking for if it's a popular company or service and the user is assured that the hit is legitimate. If you type in a bad url, you never know who's on the other end of the misspelling.Not a personal attack, but I find it humorous people (including my wife) who type a URL into google, the click on the link from the search results.
(I guess for long domain names to type in the browser search box using suggestions on might save a second or two.
Registrars usually recommend misspellings because that's more money in their pocket. Unless you run a financial institution or you have sensitive data, most companies don't worry about phishers. Hackers have bigger things to worry about than joescrazylawnservice.com. Google usually takes care of those misspellings.This is standard practice for any company, and anyone who's ever registered a domain will know that domain sellers always encourage users to do stuff like this too. It works very well at keeping traffic on your site and away from phishers who abuse misspelling domains to trick people with short attention spans into giving their usernames and passwords.
That's actually quite common, as your wife proves. Ask a non-technie (and even some techie people) to find a url and they won't type in the address, they'll google it, www and all sometimes. The benefit is usually the top hit(s) are what they're looking for if it's a popular company or service and the user is assured that the hit is legitimate. If you type in a bad url, you never know who's on the other end of the misspelling.