Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple should have never ended Aperture. I have yet to find a professional photo app that has such an elegant workflow as Aperture had.

It's really awkward that for video they have light (iMovie) version and Pro (FCP) version. For photography, there is only a light version.

Strange.
 
It's really awkward that for video they have light (iMovie) version and Pro (FCP) version. For photography, there is only a light version.

Strange.

And the "light version" utterly sucks. Its entirely and totally infuriating that the Photos app hands freaking JPEGs to external editors for roundtrip editing. JPEGS. FFFS.

What on God’s earth are these people smoking?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank001
And the "light version" utterly sucks. Its entirely and totally infuriating that the Photos app hands freaking JPEGs to external editors for roundtrip editing. JPEGS. FFFS.

What on God’s earth are these people smoking?

Also I will mention that unbelievably right around the time they said they would no longer support Aperture, about a Week later The iPad Pro was introduced and first out of the gate comes Adobe with a Mobile Vs of P.Shop for the iPad!!

There should have been an iOS Vs. of Aperture for F#$%^ Sake!! Especially as the Pro had a USB-C port allowing Hard Drives and Cameras to connect directly to iPad.

 suceded all that screen real estate to Adobe!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank001
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.