You could be very very right about this.Sounds to me like they are just heading towards having their own "Creative Cloud" subscription bundle at some point
Remember folks -- they are 110% all in on "services revenue"
I have both Pixelmator and Affinity. Over the years I've migrated to using Affinity stuff 95% of the time just because they felt more natural to me.Disappointing.
Check out Affinity products.
Would’ve loved to see Aperture get resurrected.
But I’m not mad about this acquisition at all. Not at all.
Exactly this, iTunes was the Rolls Royce of Music players, I too still use it, an older version, it was perfect until a certain version, it got bloated in later versions.
Most of Pixelmator's features will get rolled into Motion and Final Cut Pro and lesser specific features added to iWorks and Photos.This is too bad. Apple will dumb down the product and make it nearly useless by gutting the features. Or worse, maybe Apple just wants some of the code so they can pull it into some kind of Aperture replacement.
Apple made a huge mistake when they killed Aperture. When professionals who depended on Apple's so-called "pro apps" found that Apple killed Aperture they very smartly concluded that Apple might kill FPCX or Logic and so they all looked for a way to be not exposed to that kind of risk. No one wants to invest time in a system that might disappear.
So people moved from Final Cut Pro and Logic to DeVinci Resolt or Pro Tools because they lost trust in Apple and would not accept the risk. It will take Apple a decade to regain trust. I hope this is the start of Apple trying to reverse their mistake with Aperture by replacing it.
But I suspect they just bought the company so they have access to a few features to be transplanted into Photos and they intend to kill the product and company
Sounds to me like they are just heading towards having their own "Creative Cloud" subscription bundle at some point
Remember folks -- they are 110% all in on "services revenue"
Which were just acquired by Canva.Check out Affinity products.
I have no clue why folks think this "big news" or "good" or "exciting!"
Apple is mostly quite mediocre at first party software in the last decade plus and awful on actual long term support commitments if you're all in.
The fact we are bringing up Aperture is example A1 of why one shouldn't trust them over the long term. C
This. I too had thousands of hours invested in Aperture then Apple scr*wed us.EXACTLY came here to say this. WTF ? You get rid of Aperture and now this!!!!!???????? Aperture ran my Life for Years Entire Movies and TV Shows and you jus woke up one Morning and said No not gunna support it anymore and stopped updating the Camera RAW Profiles.....
Apple had a top tier Adobe competitor with Aperture (IMO better than LR at the time) and led many of us to build enterprise-critical workflows around Aperture. Then Apple scr*wed us. That said, Adobe is far worse.Well yes it is. They are creeping up rapidly on Adobe level capabilities in Pixelmator and Photomator is going after Lightroom. The image processing is not quite there at least on RAW handling yet but the tools are far better designed. If they can throw more money into it with Apple's backing then we're talking a top tier Adobe competitor here. And it'll be under a reasonable pricing model unlike Adobe's monthly mugging and cloud upsells.
Apple has the chops to make the kind of software their users demand. Unfortunately we cannot trust Apple not to kill good apps after we have built enterprise-critical workflows around said apps (e.g. MacProject, Aperture).Is this as good as an admission that Apple doesn’t have the chops to make the kind of software their users demand?
Edit: I forgot they acquired FCP too back in the blue and white G3 days
But what they need is a good photos management app - - which Aperture excelled at. So Apple killed Aperture and gave us totally lame Photos; go figure.At this point Aperture's codebase is probably too old, and there is no iOS version. This is probably the best decision as they get a good photo editing app, and a fantastic illustration app.
Aperture was primarily images management rather than image editing.Aperture 2.0 😏
Apple should have supported Aperture as needed instead of scr*wing all us customers using Aperture professionally. And no: "Apple now has a ready-made Aperture replacement in Photomator" is untrue. Aperture was primarily an images database more than an images editor, and Photomator does not provide pro image databasing. Most pro users did not edit in Aperture, they round tripped out of Aperture into PS for editing.Sheesh! All the pessimism. I guess it’s to be expected in MacRumors forums. 🥲
This is good news! People seem to have forgotten why Aperture was discontinued. Apple acknowledged that it needed a ground up rebuild and Apple didn’t want to take it on, specially given their warm relationship with Adobe at the time that has since cooled.
Apple now has a ready-made Aperture replacement in Photomator that already plugs into the Photos app in a seamless cross-app editing workflow.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see Pixelmator’s clumsy name replaced with “Aperture” or new branding while retaining its UI pretty much as is and with Apple’s resources giving the app room to grow into the future.
As a photographer and a Pixelmator user, I’m excited for what’s to come!
Aperture was already at 3.6 when it was discontinued in 2014.Aperture 2.0 😏
No chance of that IMO. Apple has no competition to Pixelmator that Apple needs to protect. Apple bought it to use it. [Edit: or at least to use the employee base]I'm more concerned that they bought it to phase it out.
They do? What big players in a productivity app genre did Apple buy in the last years?It is?
Why?
They do this sort of purchase all the time