Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Nice. 100w would be enough for wireless laptop charging. Great use case for wireless charging in a post magsafe world.
 
Why in the flying **** do I care if some random tablet had the technology first? I don't/didn't use it so I couldn't care less m8. My iPhone uses it, so I can use it, so I care.
[doublepost=1508896787][/doublepost]
I'm no psychologist, however you may want enrole in an an anger management course.
 
'The world’s first, modular wireless power system enabling Apple product owners to adapt (within the boundaries set by Apple) and integrate (with other Apple products) wireless power effortlessly!

Apple's Proxi-Module system can be used in Apple products, to provide a reliable, safe and highly efficient alternative to physical power connectors.'

Fixed it.
 
I really dont get why folk are going ape **** over wireless charging
My Nexus tablet https://m.androidcentral.com/new-nexus-7-wireless-charging-feature had the feature 4 years ago in 2013.

The main reason its interesting is the Apple effect. The industry tends to pivot on what Apple does. Many of the android journalists are excited for wireless charging for exactly this reason.

Wireless charging has been around for a while but its not particularly useful in its current form at home. Its slower than a fast charge and not much more convenient than plugging in. However, now apple are rolling it out they will be pushing to get it into restaurants, bars, airports, cars etc. Widespread adoption like that could indeed be useful.

Also this particular article shows 100w wireless charging from a company showing great safety features which could overcome the fast charge restriction.
 
Incandescent bulbs are only 5% efficient. Although most of the loss is heat, they don’t seem to interfere with the iPhone. I suspect the bulky housings for these products help deal with some of the electromagnetic noise, but I’m not an engineer...

I'd imagine the thickness of the band on the phone plus anything else inside that I'm not aware of does well in shielding noise for most frequency ranges. The skin depth for 60 Hz is about 8--9 mm for copper; when you get into RF frequencies, that can shrink to the 1 mm level. Plus, a smart grounding scheme does wonders for keeping the noise levels in check!
 
What about ranged wireless/contactless charging? Some of us thought Apple would leapfrog everyone either this year or next when it came to charging. It seems to be all about catching up and putting a new coat of paint over it.


I've been using these wireless extension cords for years to transmit power all over my house. I don't understand why Apple can't just adapt this tech to the iPhone?


http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/41/wec.shtml
 
Weird. Seems extraordinarily useful to me. Get in the car, set your phone in the console with a built in charging mat. Have a charging mat by your bed. Drop your watch, phone, and AirPods on it. Maybe have one by your desk. Have to set your phone down anyways, might as well not have to plug it in.

So you had to plug in three mats, one time, versus three devices multiple times a day.

When wireless Qi charging with a mat was mentioned a year or so ago, Phil mentioned that Apple does not see it as a viable solution. Fast-forward to the iPhone 8 and X, now it’s a solution. What changed since then? Is this Phil’s double-talk again. Did Apple’s solution not as good as Qi? Is AirPower any better, allowing simultaneous adaptive charging or is it some form of extension on Qi implementation? Is AirPower capable of rapid/fast charging?

A lot of unanswered questions at present.
 
I have zero interest in wireless charging mats (and I own an iPhone 8+). Let me know when we have true short range wireless charging. If I have to plug in a mat, I may as well just plug in the phone instead.

Agreed, inductive charging (i.e. requiring hard wire between power source and charging device) is not wireless charging. (see Nikola Tesla)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Val-kyrie
Weird. Seems extraordinarily useful to me. Get in the car, set your phone in the console with a built in charging mat. Have a charging mat by your bed. Drop your watch, phone, and AirPods on it. Maybe have one by your desk. Have to set your phone down anyways, might as well not have to plug it in.

So you had to plug in three mats, one time, versus three devices multiple times a day.

Your avatar! Lmao
 
I have zero interest in wireless charging mats (and I own an iPhone 8+). Let me know when we have true short range wireless charging. If I have to plug in a mat, I may as well just plug in the phone instead.

The point of charging mats is having a standard, and Apple is extending the Qi with its AirPower but is compatible with old Qi mats.
Now that iPhone supports inductive charging I bet we'll start to see more and more mats everywhere.
Imagine you have one on your desk at office, you lay down the iPhone and it gets charged, and you have one in your living room next to the couch, so you can put the iPhone there while watching tv. You have breakfast at Starbucks and place you phone on the mat for a quick charge after your commute.
You won't need to plug in the cable anymore, and you just forget about charging the phone.
Inductive charging was the last reason why I upgraded to iPhone 8+, I didn't care about it a month ago and I felt pretty much the same as you. Now I find it convenient and I'm happy to have that option
 
When wireless Qi charging with a mat was mentioned a year or so ago, Phil mentioned that Apple does not see it as a viable solution. Fast-forward to the iPhone 8 and X, now it’s a solution. What changed since then? Is this Phil’s double-talk again. Did Apple’s solution not as good as Qi? Is AirPower any better, allowing simultaneous adaptive charging or is it some form of extension on Qi implementation? Is AirPower capable of rapid/fast charging?
A lot of unanswered questions at present.
Well, a lot can be deducted from the fact that they DID show interest in Energous, Phil coincidentally did make these statements, and how they waited these crazy 3 years.
Apparently, they got disappointed about Energous' advancements, figured they couldn't wait any longer (probably by the lack of other milestone innovation) and decided to go for Qi in some late 8/X development phase.
That also clarifies the imminent absence of a charging "mat" to complement their client phones which I find a shame. Now buying whatever companies for Ikea-class products.
It is so embarassing.
 
Last edited:
When wireless Qi charging with a mat was mentioned a year or so ago, Phil mentioned that Apple does not see it as a viable solution. Fast-forward to the iPhone 8 and X, now it’s a solution. What changed since then? Is this Phil’s double-talk again. Did Apple’s solution not as good as Qi? Is AirPower any better, allowing simultaneous adaptive charging or is it some form of extension on Qi implementation? Is AirPower capable of rapid/fast charging?

A lot of unanswered questions at present.

Are you new here? NOTHING is a viable solution until Apple rolls out their cut of it. Apple- and particularly Phil ridiculed bigger-screen phones while Apple clung to the "perfect" of 3.5" and then 4" (both sizes were THE "perfect" size while they were the sizes Apple chose to sell). Even Jobs has plenty of 'em: "who wants an iPod to play video?" and "any tablet smaller than 9.7 inches..." to reference just two.

Apple takes pokes at features it doesn't offer for sale (yet). Passionate Apple followers then run with Apple's stance ridiculing such features to no end at every possible opportunity.

At some point, Apple rolls out their version of the feature and all that anti-feature sentiment just evaporates as if we never felt that way... even if we wrote it down and posted it in public forums. Step back only a few months and you can read passionate posts of how "I will not buy a new iPhone without TouchID", "I will NOT buy an iPhone with that ugly notch", "I will not pay $1000 for a phone" and/or "4K is a gimmick that nobody can see. Nobody needs a 4K:apple:TV" Apple rolls those out and all such arguments fade quickly and/or cease. Step back further in time and there are a couple of YEARS of published ridicule of competitors offering features like bigger-screen phones (oh the fragmentation, pants with bigger pockets, man purses, etc), and many others. "I will not buy a Mac without Magsafe." "I will not buy a phone without a headphone jack" "I refuse to carry dongles." "I will not buy a Mac without <favored> port(s)." And on and on. Remember when iDevices having only 1GB of RAM made perfect sense because iOS was so "optimized & refined that it didn't need more than 1GB" and "who wants the battery burn that comes with more than 1GB RAM?". Did iOS become unoptimized & refined in the last few years? I've seen no such accusations against Apple now that mobile devices have expanded the RAM.

NFC was relentlessly ridiculed. Then Apple rolls out ApplePay and not only is it suddenly & immediately acceptable, but there are many calls to boycott buying at any store that will not let us pay that way.

We'll even fragment our Apple worship-like support over the SAME feature. For example, there was the day that Apple rolled out a new iPad with a Retina screen and a new iPad Mini without Retina. We made a very passionate case to each other why Retina was THE must-have reason to upgrade the iPad. Simultaneously, we made a very passionate case to each other why Retina was NOT important on the Mini screen... that it was must-upgrade for other reasons... until the next Mini when it rolled out WITH a Retina screen and that became THE main reason to upgrade. Apparently Retina on the Mini only did NOT make sense while Apple chose NOT to include it.:rolleyes:

Same with front-facing iSight camera in the first generation iPad. Apple opted to leave it out for whatever reason (breakdowns revealed there was even a space for such a camera). "We" made very passionate cases for why an iPad should NOT have a front-facing camera: stability, "who wants to be looking up my nose?", video chat is not important in a mobile device, etc. The very next year Apple rolls out a new iPad with a front-facing "FaceTime" camera... which immediately became THE rally-cry reason to upgrade iPads: "OMG", "Now we can video chat with our iPads!!!", etc.

In a nutshell: business as usual. There's highly passionate arguments against everything NOT yet available in Apple products for sale now... until it is... which "magically" transforms such features into a "shut up and take my money" (often THE) must-have reason to upgrade. Wireless charging has been relentlessly ridiculed for years now in countless posts. But now that Apple offers the feature, we magically feel very different about it.

In all cases, some proceed if they never made any comment against such features. Some may offer some wishy-washy transitional comments: "...but when I got to see it in person" and/or "it's kind of growing on me" posts. And some go with the old "Apple is not first, but wait so that they get it right" spin (which of course, is only selectively applied when Apple is not rolling out something first).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: code-m
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.