Weeks?So in other words: they are selling devices that after a couple of weeks deliver app. 50% of the promised power and call that a feature...
Since you mentioned Jobs...you mean like providing cases for “antenna-gate”? Since you also mentioned visionary seems like this is a “visionary” stealth move. Cook has had 6 years to ruin Apple and the world is still waiting.Complete bs. It’s my device and if I want full speed with 2 hours battery life, it’s my choice. Apple has no business crippling MY hardware. If my phone after two years started having problems, no problem, I fully expect it. No big deal. Just tell me I need replacing. But throttling my phone is not a decision Apple should be making on my property.
Clearly an attempt to avoid a recall and push users toward upgrading. Tim Cook, a businessman vs the visionary Jobs was. Cook will ruin Apple with his greedy ways. Already started with the $1000 iPhone. Next up $1200 for the plus model. Easy choice cause your iPhone 7 will throttled and run like **** by release date.
Sure, it's logical to run users' phones at half their rated speed without telling them, to avoid incurring the corporate expense of replacing batteries and/or fixing the underlying issue that is causing the phone shutdowns. It's logical for Apple. Not so logical (or fair) for their users.
The 7 is a newer phone than 6 and 6s.
If the phone is connected to a power source, it shouldn't slow down. They should design it like that and not make people think the problem is the phone.Given the choice between a dead phone or potential slow phone, “slow phone” wins every time.
Doubt it.Yes? I am well aware of that. That doesn't change the fact that this seems to be a very specific hardware problem with only SOME of the Apple devices - suggesting faulty manufacturing or engineering and NOT that this is just a problem that is happening with any kind of phone due to the batteries...
Replace battery with third party and Apple will completely refuse to service your phone afterwards. Break screen, sorry, you have third party battery. We can’t replace. We can sell you a new $1000 iPhone.Thats ok, a bunch of 3rd party shops will take your money.
read Riahi's post^replace the battery or go get a new phone simple as that
so you'd be ok with your phone dying in 2 hours?Make it optional. B.S. that they aren’t excited it fuels sales. That’s absolutely a factor with their software changes.
Doubt it.
You obviously have never bothered to read the license agreement at purchase or with updates.Complete bs. It’s my device and if I want full speed with 2 hours battery life, it’s my choice. Apple has no business crippling MY hardware. If my phone after two years started having problems, no problem, I fully expect it. No big deal. Just tell me I need replacing. But throttling my phone is not a decision Apple should be making with my property.
Clearly an attempt to avoid a recall and push users toward upgrading. Tim Cook, a businessman vs the visionary Jobs was. Cook will ruin Apple with his greedy ways. Already started with the $1000 iPhone. Next up $1200 for the plus model. Easy choice cause your iPhone 7 will throttled and run like **** by release date.
How do you know it happens to every phone at the same time? Quash your unearned arrogance.so you'd be ok with your phone dying in 2 hours?
The part about "Apple offers battery replacement in stores" is not really true. I've gone twice to an Apple store to have them assess my battery. They refused to let me pay them to replace the battery because their diagnostics passed.
I'm in the situation where Apple won't even let me pay to replace my battery even though I have random shut downs and blatant CPU throttling when below 50%.
did I say that? I asked if he would be happy with his phone lasting a few hours at full powerHow do you know it happens to every phone at the same time? Quash your unearned arrogance.
Just because you don't like what Apple said, that doesn't necessarily mean the paradigm is false. It simply means you don't like the response.Apple offers a false paradigm and once again, the fanboys eat it up.
My iPhone se battery shouldn’t be jacked 6 months after buying.
So Apple admitting to slowing phones down, to near uselessness is not a controversy?Gong...another bogus controversy bites the dust.
There has been anecdotal evidence of this for a while. The Geekbench results this week have confirmed it and has forced Apple into making a statement about it. The really funny thing is it was only in October that another benchmarking company released a report which they say proved Apple were not slowing phones down, https://www.macrumors.com/2017/10/06/apple-doesnt-deliberately-slow-older-iphones/ I bet they feel silly now.So no one noticed anything until someone started running Geekbench?
Maybe that’s a bug that has to be squashed.If the phone is connected to a power source, it shouldn't slow down. They should design it like that and not make people think the problem is the phone.
Give me a break. Who reads that bs. Defend Apple all you want, but I’m really pissed off with this practice.You obviously have never bothered to read the license agreement at purchase or with updates.
replace the battery or go get a new phone simple as that