Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is this normal for companies to make changes on EO's? It is not a law
While you’re correct that EOs don’t apply to anything other than the Executive Branch (i.e. government agencies), the EO changed the name in the official government database Apple and Google pull from for names of geographic features in the US. As much as I dislike the change, Apple and Google not changing the name when the database changed would be out of the ordinary.

And given he’s retaliating against reporters for not updating their style guide to use his stupid name, you can bet he would have retaliated against Apple and Google, doubly so if they were going out of their way to keep it by its real name. Probably not in the best interest of Apple to intentionally piss off a famously vindictive bully who is petty enough to rename the Gulf in the first place and happens to be the most powerful person in the world.

Not to say that those who think they should have resisted anyway are necessarily wrong, just providing more context.
 
I know, I'm the one who said that it's silly the way the American political class likes renaming stuff. But I'll admit, this song is amusing:

 
  • Wow
Reactions: millerj123
I don't think any of us are surprised by the pettiness of a narcissistic fraud, traitor, liar, and leaker who regularly obstruct justice without ethical boundaries. We've experienced it for 9 years now. Renaming international bodies of water to pander to his own legacy and illegally retaliating when an international press service chooses not to use it is exactly the kind of pettiness we expect from him.
Whoa, no one is talking about Biden here. 😄

Just a revolting capitulation.

No one but the serious toadies is calling it "Gulf of America". This is just like when France didn't support the Iraq invasion and people tried to call french fries "freedom fries".
I don't care much for the French, but that was pretty lame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaymc
If I am being cynical about this, and I am pretty cynical, Apple is toeing the MAGA line because doing so means more leeway in getting the justice department to drop the lawsuit against Google that gives Apple $20 billion a year just to keep Google the default and to have FTC regulators turn a blind eye to other anti-competitive behaviors from Apple. Apple Inc would rather have $20 billion a year in free money than take an otherwise easy moral stance.
 
Last edited:
That doesn't make it a better or more humane idea
:(

As a country, we need to be better than this and lead by example on humanitarian issues and conduct 🙏

We have a checkered past there, but I'd like to still believe we can do good and be better
Well, these countries should take their criminals back. If not, they're kind of forcing us to dump them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaymc and Razorpit
They didn't mind flying over a fence to get here, so they can fly back.

This isn't a school, no need for class. They want to come here like criminals, treat them like criminals. I have zero sympathy for them.


Let's please be more humane than this

The high road is the one to be on, with moral issues in particular
 
This isn't a school, no need for class. They want to come here like criminals, treat them like criminals. I have zero sympathy for them.
That's too far! You can oppose illegal immigration and all, and still sympathize with why they came over here! Well, aside from the ones who came to rape or steal or whatever (as opposed to the ones who came for better economic opportunity, and all). If you don't want to sympathize with them, I won't complain.
 
Last edited:
Are all immigrants criminals? I guess that depends on your definition of “criminals”. Some think that entering a country without the proper immigration documents, automatically means you’re a criminal. At the same time that’s characteristic of people who flee from poverty, violence, etc. in their own country; they ofcourse simply cannot have all the “proper paperwork” done. Refugees.
For me, it’s absurd to define all immigrants as criminals.
 
Last edited:
Are all immigrants criminals? I guess that depends on your definition of “criminals”. Some think that entering a country without the proper immigration documents, automatically means you’re a criminal. At the same time that’s characteristic of people who flee from poverty, violence, etc. in their own country; they ofcourse simply cannot have all the “proper paperwork” done. Refugees.
For me, it’s absurd to define all immigrants as criminals.
You do realize the United States established a legal way for someone to flee their country and seek asylum? The hundreds of thousands of people entering our southern border chose to ignore our laws, thus they are illegal. The laws exist for a reason. By allowing these people to enter illegally the previous administration failed in one of the few Constitutional responsibilities it has.
 
You do realize the United States established a legal way for someone to flee their country and seek asylum? The hundreds of thousands of people entering our southern border chose to ignore our laws, thus they are illegal.
And thus criminals that should be treated as criminals, right?
The laws exist for a reason. By allowing these people to enter illegally the previous administration failed in one of the few Constitutional responsibilities it has.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Well, these countries should take their criminals back. If not, they're kind of forcing us to dump them.
The vast, vast majority of people coming into this country aren’t criminals, they’re people coming to this country for a better life, like most of our ancestors did. You’d think the President who is married to an immigrant who violated US immigration law would realize that.

Do you consider the First Lady a Criminal?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.