But Apple isn't selling to "fanboys" anymore, they are selling to millions and millions of average people who don't care what is inside, they want something that works well and, perhaps, looks good. Or, for some people admittedly, that looks good and perhaps works well. I don't think Apple really cares what the "fanboys" think, reallyOr the needs of many others.
How long can Apple sell the same crap before the fanboys finally give in and say, "Yes Apple is really lagging behind and it's pathetic and unacceptable, asinine prices aside"?
No. I buy a new system (actually, refurbished usually) get Apple Care, and work it 'til it croaks. I've got one of the early aluminium MBPs that banged and dinged and works. It does what I need it to do. I also have a Mac Pro that I do the bulk of my professional work on (I'm a professional photographer/artist). Portables are for convenience - they allow me to light work away from the office. Real work gets done on desktop system.Doesn't it strike you as a little pathetic that the current high end MBP nearly matches that of the CTO MBP from October 2008?
...
All of the above aside, when was the last time Apple upped the resolution on 15" models? I know it's been years, but when did it go 1440x900 and what was it increased from? I'd love 1680x1050.
What would you do with more resolution on a portable. As someone mentioned, menus and dialogues get really small. Most web content is not set for much more resolution. For the majority of consumers, what advantage would more resolution give them? Assuming that you could bump the resolution without dropping the battery life. Lately Apple seems to be concentrating on battery life, and I think they may have decided that a marginal increase in screen resolution was not as beneficial (read 'marketable', perhaps) as increasing the time between charges.
IMHO, of course.