Even if they limit you to x amount of texts a day/month using the satellites, it can really save and help a lot of people.
What mainstream problem does this solve? It seems like a minuscule edge case.
You’re truly unimaginative if you think this. 1. That apple will ignore 50% of its American consumer base. 2. That Apple will ignore advancement in cellular tech. 3. That they aren’t creative enough to market this.EXACTLY! The vast majority of Apple’s user base live in metropolitan areas. While what kind of broadband and how fast it is certainly varies based upon where you are located, certainly access to a high speed connection is ubiquitous. The only time his really makes sense is in rural areas, particularly in remote places, where you have zero broadband access. I don’t see apple chasing this set of users. It’s not their MO and for what, to say you can send a text message via a satellite. Yeah, I totally see apple investing billions for that alone…
Hiking/Camping trip emergencies with no cellular access.What mainstream problem does this solve? It seems like a minuscule edge case.
Yeah exactly. Having just gotten back from vacation in the upper peninsula of Michigan (and liking to explore nature regularly), I’m all about this. Cell service was basically only available in remotely scattered towns and not in between and not in the parks.If you are in a SOS situation in dead zone you could contact 911 in an emergency using satellite. Terrestrial cellular coverage isn’t available everywhere in North America for given carriers.
Canceling InReach services that use satellites to text with your phone for 12+ bucks a month will be a welcome benefit as well.
Just this year alone, I have been to several cell signal dead zones:What mainstream problem does this solve? It seems like a minuscule edge case.
Yeah exactly. Having just gotten back from vacation in the upper peninsula of Michigan (and liking to explore nature regularly), I’m all about this. Cell service was basically only available in remotely scattered towns and not in between and not in the parks.
I live in a rural area next to a small city of 50,000 we have coverage downtown but 5 minutes outside of that you get nothing this would be another big win like Starlink was for us. Plus cruise ship coverage as well as extreme outdoor enthusiasts like myself planning to climb part of Mt.Everest next summer and with this I could avoid buying a sat phone.EXACTLY! The vast majority of Apple’s user base live in metropolitan areas. While what kind of broadband and how fast it is certainly varies based upon where you are located, certainly access to a high speed connection is ubiquitous. The only time his really makes sense is in rural areas, particularly in remote places, where you have zero broadband access. I don’t see apple chasing this set of users. It’s not their MO and for what, to say you can send a text message via a satellite. Yeah, I totally see apple investing billions for that alone…
There is no car….. just stop.Isn't this more about future for Apple Car than iPhone?
It is.What mainstream problem does this solve? It seems like a minuscule edge case.
They are definitely making a car.There is no car….. just stop.
Wow talk about jinxing yourself and setting up the irony where you will need it.Meh....Few will need it, and Apple will likely manage to lock out any potentially better alternatives like the T-Mobile/SpaceX system. And IF Apple ever gets it to work without too many bugs, it will probably cost more than it is worth to most users. It isn't something I need or want, so I'll sit on the sideline and watch Apple make a lot of promises for the future rather than deliver features right away...
What mainstream problem does this solve? It seems like a minuscule edge case.
Yeah. I was at fairly popular tourist sites (in UP terms) with hundreds or possibly low thousands of other people in the park at the same time (Pictured Rocks, Taquahemnon Falls) and no service on either Verizon or ATT.Yep. And think of national parks ... we were just in Joshua Tree for a couple days and had no reception through much of the park. We also spend time at a lake home in Northern CA and the part of the lake we spend the most time on has no reception. Personally, I've been hoping for this feature for years.