I am curious if this works if you are out in the middle of the ocean in international waters? (Eventually?)Nice! Curious to know if this is going to work in the Sahara Desert in Africa. What about Iceland or Antartica?
I am curious if this works if you are out in the middle of the ocean in international waters? (Eventually?)Nice! Curious to know if this is going to work in the Sahara Desert in Africa. What about Iceland or Antartica?
EXACTLY! The vast majority of Apple’s user base live in metropolitan areas. While what kind of broadband and how fast it is certainly varies based upon where you are located, certainly access to a high speed connection is ubiquitous. The only time his really makes sense is in rural areas, particularly in remote places, where you have zero broadband access. I don’t see apple chasing this set of users. It’s not their MO and for what, to say you can send a text message via a satellite. Yeah, I totally see apple investing billions for that alone…
Doubt it. Need to be in view of the satellites.Maybe my wife can finally get a text through her schools walls.. instead of having 15 pop up the minute she walks out the door.
What mainstream problem does this solve? It seems like a minuscule edge case.
I think it will be available everywhere that satellites reach. Doesn't seem to be a reason to limit it to a countryWe need this in Australia as well. As soon as you head out of the main centres there’s very little coverage. Many of my rural friends are already on Starlink as well now and it’s really helped connect remote communities.
And that $12 a month gets you, what, 40 messages a month?Who are you? This will be the largest advancement in cellular technology since the iPhone itself.
If this is even remotely used in the way the rumors are saying it will save lives, provide peace of mind, and be infinitely more useful than any additional pixel count on a camera.
Maybe you live in flatland, USA in the center of metropolis, but half of America doesn’t. Lack of reception is hugely frustrating. Being able to send a text will be a great first step.
Canceling InReach services that use satellites to text with your phone for 12+ bucks a month will be a welcome benefit as well.
Just hang with your iPhone 14 pro max buddy all the time.nice, but am I going to upgrade my 13PM because of it - nah, another year without that feature I shall survive![]()
That's what I was thinking. It would be great on the Apple Watch. Hopefully not just the rumored Rugged Edition.Wondering if the new Apple Watch cellular version will be able to take advantage of this. Maybe only on the Pro version?
Isn't this more about future for Apple Car than iPhone?
Where I live I do a lot of mountain biking in areas with little to no service. This feature would be AWESOME.That's cool! Is anyone really excited about this feature? Anyone out there???
If Starlinks solution to this is to use existing 5G bandwidth and this gets approved by regulators, there wouldn't be anything that Apple needed to do. Seems like a win win IMO.Given Musk and Apple have a...well...not great past, we'll be ending up with an Apple competitor getting direct starlink access on handsets at some point in the future, leaving Apple to either not have that ability at all, or use someone like Globalstar, who've got a vastly slower network. Globalstar is absolutely fine if its only for emergency calls, but when we inevitably move to satellite for data and standard calls then Apples got a problem.
This totally speaks to the "Far Out" to me.
Does every issue have to be mainstream in order to be fixed/enhanced? If you're that fairly rare person with an emergency in an area of no cell coverage, you'd pay or do anything to get help. Or would you be satisfied to die out there in the desert because you're a minuscule edge case?What mainstream problem does this solve? It seems like a minuscule edge case.
Who are you? This will be the largest advancement in cellular technology since the iPhone itself.
If this is even remotely used in the way the rumors are saying it will save lives, provide peace of mind, and be infinitely more useful than any additional pixel count on a camera.
Maybe you live in flatland, USA in the center of metropolis, but half of America doesn’t. Lack of reception is hugely frustrating. Being able to send a text will be a great first step.
Canceling InReach services that use satellites to text with your phone for 12+ bucks a month will be a welcome benefit as well.
It's completely incomprehensible that there are people who don't understand this. Who think that every problem that isn't mainstream should be ignored and criticized. I suspect it will be mainstream enough if that person needs to get a message out that may save their life.Sure, it's not something people will use often, but when it's necessary it can be life saving.
There's vast stretches of highway in sparsely populated areas of the US that have no cellular service. Being able to send messages if you're stranded out there can save your life.
In places like Florida and the Gulf coast, hurricanes can knock out cellular infrastructure and leave people unable to communicate. Being able to send emergency messages, or even "I survived the storm" to family members is a wonderful capability.
It's like a fire extinguisher. It'll sit there for five years collecting dust but when something flares up in your kitchen you'll be glad you have it. It also doesn't cost much extra to implement in today's chipsets.
I doubt it will work here, as usual it will roll out first in the US and then for us Europeans. I'm sure they can't bring it out here at launch due to some bureaucratic limitation. It's a pity because even where I live (Spain), coverage drops a lot when out of the urban areas.If the rumors are true, how good are the chances that this will work outside USA?
For example in EU?
This. Even if I wanted to upgrade, not sure just texting would push me through unless I was an avid outside explorer of territory I have never been to.Worth emphasizing that this rumor is only about messaging, and just text messaging at that.
Still incredibly useful and a definite harbinger of things to come. There are many many places where it simply isn’t feasible to install land-based communication towers. (Although those old enough to remember analog cell days probably recall how amazing the voice coverage in remote areas used to be)
A problem 0.00004% of the population will ever encounter.If you are in a SOS situation in dead zone you could contact 911 in an emergency using satellite. Terrestrial cellular coverage isn’t available everywhere in North America for given carriers.