Yes and no. The music industry was in a bad place when iTunes came along, so yes they helped them to revive their business model. On the other hand, iTunes/Apple became the gatekeeper for a significant majority of their digital sales for years to come. It's never ideal to put all your eggs in one basket, so to speak (especially a basket that takes a 30% cut).
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple and Magazine Publishers Yet to Agree on Subscription Terms
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yes and no. The music industry was in a bad place when iTunes came along, so yes they helped them to revive their business model. On the other hand, iTunes/Apple became the gatekeeper for a significant majority of their digital sales for years to come. It's never ideal to put all your eggs in one basket, so to speak (especially a basket that takes a 30% cut).
I am 38 y/o. I have had 1 magazine subscription in my entire life (PC Gamer)
I cancelled it after 2 months when I realized they were being delivered weeks after the magazine had already hit stores shelves. (I'm in Canada)
I've spent a FORTUNE on magazines in my life but have stopped buying magazines completely now.
1. I totalled up the cost of back issues of magazines I have on my bookshelves and nearly had a heart attack.
2. I can't get good prices on magazines (subscriptions) in a timely matter.
3. Magazines these days are filled with old news the moment they hit the shelves/arrive at my door.
If I had access to popular magazines through iTunes I guarantee I would go from 0 magazine consumption to at LEAST 6 annual subscriptions if the pricing was less than for a physical copy of the same magazine.
I think magazine publishers are idiots if they think I'm the only one like this.
I cancelled it after 2 months when I realized they were being delivered weeks after the magazine had already hit stores shelves. (I'm in Canada)
I've spent a FORTUNE on magazines in my life but have stopped buying magazines completely now.
1. I totalled up the cost of back issues of magazines I have on my bookshelves and nearly had a heart attack.
2. I can't get good prices on magazines (subscriptions) in a timely matter.
3. Magazines these days are filled with old news the moment they hit the shelves/arrive at my door.
If I had access to popular magazines through iTunes I guarantee I would go from 0 magazine consumption to at LEAST 6 annual subscriptions if the pricing was less than for a physical copy of the same magazine.
I think magazine publishers are idiots if they think I'm the only one like this.
Yep. For various reasons Apple is very protective of their customer info and won't let just anyone have it full on. It is rather generous of them to allow the opt in.
Or look at the flip side. A mere 30% for Apple to host the files, provide the downloading system etc.
The industry is having a tough time adapting
iAds probably won't be required. Maybe for FREE magazines, but this would be similar to apps (to pay for hosting, etc.). For the paid magazines, suppose you have a $10 magazine. The publisher gets $7 dollars of that. If they also choose to do iAds, they would probably get an additional cut of that, too (60%). Anyway, this is clearly a sweet deal for the publishers. Designers just aren't good at making great magazine apps yet. The first amazing magazine app for the iPad will be an enormous success.
iAds probably won't be required. Maybe for FREE magazines, but this would be similar to apps (to pay for hosting, etc.). For the paid magazines, suppose you have a $10 magazine. The publisher gets $7 dollars of that. If they also choose to do iAds, they would probably get an additional cut of that, too (60%). Anyway, this is clearly a sweet deal for the publishers. Designers just aren't good at making great magazine apps yet. The first amazing magazine app for the iPad will be an enormous success.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdowns View Post
Apple has interfered to a far greater extent than killing cats and worshipping satan.
And what happens when Say Wired magazine does a story on how great Android is?
Actually, I think it comes down to Constitutional right to free speech. Apple is not yet above the law.
Originally Posted by rdowns View Post
Apple has interfered to a far greater extent than killing cats and worshipping satan.
And what happens when Say Wired magazine does a story on how great Android is?
Actually, I think it comes down to Constitutional right to free speech. Apple is not yet above the law.
Steve should have final editorial approval.
Sleek and easy to understand iContent.
Steve knows what's best for us.
Sleek and easy to understand iContent.
Steve knows what's best for us.
70% ?? I don't blame them! I think it should be a little higher than that! Between 75 and 85 would be more reasonable for the magazine companies I should think...
I can see why Apple wants to hold on to the subscriptions though, since that's how they work the podcasts... But why would the magazine companies want them to subscribe specifically through themselves?
I can see why Apple wants to hold on to the subscriptions though, since that's how they work the podcasts... But why would the magazine companies want them to subscribe specifically through themselves?
Hosting isn't cheap.
And Apple is handling payment processing, which is also not cheap. The banks can charge a merchant as much as $1000 just to set up an account and then an easy $200-300 a year for maintanence. And that is on top of transaction fees that can be as high as 50 cents a pop. For someone like Wired, or WSJ, that might not be a big deal. But for smaller groups those fees alone could break the bank.
And remember that as of now Apple is not requiring magazines use their system, anymore than Mac OS developers will be forced to use the Mac Spp Store. It is just another option. One that could benefit both user and publisher
I disagree. I am more than happy to pay the same amount, if I get added value out of it. Just converting it into a PDF or ePub is not enough. But a magazine that let's me watch the interview instead of just reading what he said. That could be worth it. A film magazine that let's me see in action the camera move they are trying to describe, worth it. And so on.
This to me is where I find things truly lacking. No one is really asking what they can do that wasn't possible before. And then doing it
Last edited:
