The Beetles should pull their entire discography from the iTunes Store! This is so blatant.Seems the Beatles' Recording Company ought to sue Apple Computer, claiming prior art?
View attachment 1703902
The Beetles should pull their entire discography from the iTunes Store! This is so blatant.Seems the Beatles' Recording Company ought to sue Apple Computer, claiming prior art?
View attachment 1703902
That's not how trademark law works. At all.
They're not even (remotely) in the same field of business for a start.
So, which of these three logos for my new company developing language software will be tolerated by Apple:Actually, yes it is.
Apple is upset that the Pear logo reminds people of the Apple brand? If that’s true then who is the winner here? What about the Macrumours logo?
So, which of these three logos for my new company developing language software will be tolerated by Apple:
č or ç or ć
?
Or a black square with a forward pointing slash above it? One round-shaped fruit with a stem trademarks all remaining round-shaped fruits with a stem? Food v tech industry — this is com-pearing apples and oranges ...
Wouldn't an easy fix be to have the leaf on the pear angle to the left?
Apple have become dogs.
Actually, the hole in the leaf is an almost exact copy of the leaf on the Apple logo. Easy fix, just change the shape of the leaf a little, tilt it to the left and I think Apple will not contest their use. Probably most people wouldn't notice the change.It looks nothing like the Apple logo. Apple's legal department needs some applied corona. I still remember when Apple was sued by Apple Records for the exact same thing. Apple agreed, as part of the settlement, to never, ever, get into the music industry. Then came the sosumi beep sound and the rest his history.
Weirdly, their logo looks like the Mac Rumors logo!!Imagine being Super Healthy Kids and having to pay lawyers to defend against one of the world's most valuable companies for that. Apple should be heavily penalized for that kind of frivolity
The argument is dull. They sue people who aren’t doing anything wrong to deter other people who might do something wrong 😑It’s not about Prepear themselves. It’s a deterrence case to prevent many companies creating fruit logos (with leaf pointing to the right side of course) because eventually logos will appear that look much closer to Apple’s.
The argument is dull. They sue people who aren’t doing anything wrong to deter other people who might do something wrong 😑
This pear 🍐 doesn’t look anything like Apples logo.
If I owned that company I wouldn’t give Apple a penny. Not 1 cent. There’s no reason too. Their logo looks nothing like Apple’s.
You can, but Apple will tell you how your logo should look like.I see a freaking pear! Now I cant have fruit in any of my future businesses?