If you think the siege at Evergreen was "fringe", then you should also explain other similar "fringe" cases with the
Berkley riots and arson, which also escalated to the streets with armed thugs beating people over the head with
bike locks, or the Univeristy of
Missouri professor who during an occupation of public land felt legitimised to assault students in the third-degree. All of these cases started because of charges of racism, for either "white people not leaving", "hosting conservative speakers", or an alleged "poop graffiti swastika". In all cases group racial indignation was the justification for behaving in a disgraceful manner. If you think these things are fringe you have a very warped definition of fringe, and are in no place to question my use of "Identitarian", which I included with the modifier "left", that I take as self evident. Besides, such a term and its derivatives is
being used widely by commentators.
The one thing all these protests have in common is they were not peaceful as per MLK dream. Do you think MLK would want to kick white people out of a university for a day, for contrived solidarity? Do you think MLK would want to stop a conservative from speaking with violence and arson? Do you think MLK would want professors to order other students into man handling a media student because of some graffiti somewhere? Come on we are better than this.